My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/02/21
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/02/21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2025 3:13:42 PM
Creation date
4/16/2025 3:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/21/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds Yield City Council <br />Regular Meeting February 13, lgs9 <br />--------------- lip n <br />Page Five <br />r. Grovel explained the idea of Silver View Plaza <br />j� is to provide services <br />to the residents, and he had <br />not been aware of a problem with <br />the Dominos drivers. <br />He stated he would write to the manager <br />him <br />and advise <br />to abide by the rules and <br />posted speed limits. <br />Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened <br />the regular meeting at 7:39 <br />Pm. <br />Councilmember Quick questioned why there was any <br />hurry to take <br />action if a tenant <br />is not coming in. <br />i1' Fir at Reading <br />City planner Herman explained that Kraus Anderson has <br />applied for this, <br />of Ordinance <br />No. q5q <br />f or future use. <br />CO'Jn <br />stated the ordinance looks <br />goodcwithmthe <br />restrictionsthat are included, but <br />Without proper policing, it <br />could become a detriment <br />to the neighborhood. <br />Mayor Hankner stated she has a problem in supporting <br />an ordinance change. <br />She added the Planning Commission <br />did a good job but she feels it is <br />an inappropriate use <br />Within a B-2 zone, and would present problems for the <br />neighborhood. <br />Councilmember Quick stated he did not feel it fit <br />into the B-2 scheme. <br />Councilmember wuori stated the Planning Commission <br />Spent quite a while discussing the issue, and they <br />realized i.t could be a problem for the neighborhood. <br />However, if they had denied it at the Planning Commission <br />level, the applicant would have been granted an appeal. <br />By making a recommendation to the Council, they have <br />eliminated a longer process. <br />Motion/Second- <br />No. 454,menBinQuick/Blanchard to deny Ordinance <br />hmunicipal <br />by amending Chapter40entitled ^Zoning"Mqurtds Yiew. <br />ayes 0 nays <br />N.Otion Carried <br />Mayor Hankner requested that auto accessory store be 12. First Reading <br />moved out of B-2 to B-3. <br />Clerk/Administrator, Pauley clarified what hobby stores of Ordinance <br />could include. No. 452 <br />Mr. Grovel asked for an explanation of the difference <br />between what is sold in a hardware store and an auto <br />parts store in B-3. <br />Mayor Hankner replied hardware stores are more diverse, <br />and their primary stock is not related to automobiles.' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.