My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/07/17
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/07/17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 11:03:28 AM
Creation date
4/23/2025 11:01:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/17/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council <br />- Regular Meeting_________ <br />explained Spring Lake Park had planned to <br />Mr. tructoa sidewalk <br />but that has changed• He <br />construct a sidewalk also# <br />agreed the City may want to reconsider the sidewa <br />lk <br />issue. <br />Mr. Bardwell questioned the need for a four lane rth <br />as there are four lane eelroads close both to thenorth <br />tax- <br />and south, adding he <br />thersswasteit is a <br />tated hefeels he will be <br />payers money, <br />ty <br />losing value on his home with the widening <br />Road J. <br />Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, questioned the <br />analysis done on storm water run-off* <br />that <br />drainage is going. <br />Mr. Paulu reviewed the information, explaining that <br />they looked at where the changinge <br />drainage patterns. <br />This proposal will not Chang <br />and will not bring any vater into Mounds view that is <br />not already coming in now. <br />ect manager from Ramsey County <br />Wayne Leonard, pro ] <br />Of the <br />Public Works Department, reviewed the history <br />planned development of theareadp an khtogether on it. <br />County and Ramsey County <br />ed why four lane <br />Mr. Mielkquestionor road standards. <br />s are planned. <br />whether it e is due e traffic <br />Mr. Paulu replied the traffic volume projections call <br />for it, as well as the existing traffic. <br />Mr. McCarty stated the committee I a be making a as soon as <br />ive <br />recommendation to the full County Board ved. <br />possible, once the final report is rece <br />Jean Rockney, of Greenwood and Long Lake Road, <br />our lanest and <br />questioned why it was planned for f610 instead - <br />asked why people couldn't use Hwy- <br />Mr. Bardwell asked about eliminating heavy trucks <br />exsting <br />from the road, stating <br />they could use the Hei tadded <br />four lane roads to the north antraffic kept off <br />he definitely wanted <br />County Road J. lid <br />Mr. Plu replied that if state Icannot restrict trucks from the roadls neeaddedey <br />the road design limit is for 10 tons. <br />Rachael Bardwell questioned how much traffico 9th <br />suggested widening coo red <br />nty <br />Avenue carriedt and she sa99 .are going <br />Road J, but not tootCeer•lanes, <br />statedlthgy <br />making it a City <br />July 10, 1989 <br />Page Pour <br />10 <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.