My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/08/07
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/08/07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 11:07:50 AM
Creation date
4/23/2025 11:07:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/7/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lcng-Term Financial Plan <br />Page Nineteen <br />2, When monies beccme available, many amenities need <br />to be added to the parks as listed in the capital <br />improvement plan. This will offer <br />residents more <br />recreational facility use opportunities, <br />3. The City cannot rely on Federal, State <br />ortcounty <br />dollars to develop the park system <br />qualifications are so specific and monies so <br />tight. Park dedication <br />fees <br />are <br />almost athing <br />of the past- New way <br />improve- <br />ments must be pursued. <br />4. Leisure recreational activities will continually <br />be offered as interest andneeds <br />ated diverse <br />Efforts will be given to p dictdent se <br />recreational park facilities for the enjoy <br />of <br />unorganized activity, as lifestyles demand. <br />5. Capital improvements in the parks will continue <br />to be funded with Park Dedication fee of $12,500 <br />per year for the next four years received from <br />the Everest Development Corp <br />6, The acquisition of land north of Highway 610 <br />requires the study for potential City land use. <br />Therefore, a study must be planned to achieve the <br />l best use of this resource. <br />andtthe same <br />recreationtsurveyt <br />is suggested that a p park development can <br />be taken so that future p The last <br />refle <br />t the <br />es of the <br />parks csurvey was rconducted inm1980-d parks. These parks are <br />The City has six neighborhoo <br />designed for high intense actisareylocated oinng <br />residents. The neighborhood aarkspark is lacking in the <br />strategic areas, although a p <br />south and west side of Silver Lake Road aadksldownot <br />10. A problem arises when neighborhood p for <br />offer the number ffferlaufacilities <br />ballfieldandrtotlloe for <br />activsummer use and skating <br />recreationalfor lfacilities.These do <br />not provide adequateneighborhood <br />Additional facincluding <br />Lambert, Oakwood and parks, includig Woodcrest, <br />ng <br />still need additional facilities to major goal al oftheir <br />the <br />designed function. Therefore, <br />additionalgrecreational <br />parks division is to provide <br />facilities in the parks. Along this theme are <br />options such as a feasiblity study considering the <br />purchase of a bridge to be placed across Silver View <br />Pond. <br />The goal for recreation programming ishtoffersinue to <br />offer the School -I` <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.