My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/10/16
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/10/16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 11:16:16 AM
Creation date
4/23/2025 11:16:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/16/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NORTHERN LIGHTER PYROTECHNICS <br />Mi Creative Fireworks Dapla a <br />*Designers © Shooters. <br />P.O. Box 19763 <br />± <br />St. Paul, Mn. 55119 <br />`,+.'•'w <br />?I `. <br />AW- <br />MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL, <br />AS ALWAYS, THE NORTHERN LIGHTERS VERY MUCH ENJOYED PROVIDING <br />AND DISPLAYING THE FIREWORKS FOR YOUR CELEBRATION IN THE <br />PARK. I HOPE THE NEW SEPTEMBER DATING WORKED OUT WELL WITH <br />BOTH YOURSELVES AND THE AUDIENCE. THIS YEAR WE SHOT THE <br />ENTIRE SHOW ELECTRICALLY. BECAUSE WE DID THIS THE TIMING <br />WAS VERY GOOD ALONG WITH THE CONTENT. AS IN THE PAST WE <br />WERE LIMITED IN THE SIZE OF SHELLS WE COULD USE BECAUSE OF <br />THE SITE AND ITS TIGHT QUARTERS. WE WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE <br />TO INCLUDE MANY TYPES OF NEW ITEMS THAT HAVE BECOME <br />AVAILABLE OVER THE YEARS. BUT THE SITE JUST IS NOT <br />APPROPRIATE. A NUMBER OF OUR MEMBERS ARE LICENSED SHELL <br />MANUFACTURERS AND THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO BUILD VERY HIGH <br />QUALITY AERIAL SHELLS. ALTHOUGH WE ARE ABLE TO INSERT A FEW <br />OF THESE SHELLS IN YOUR SHOW WE WOULD LIKE TO INCLUDE MANY <br />MORE, BUT AGAIN, THE SITE IS JUST NOT ADEQUATE. UPPERMOST <br />ON EVERYONE'S MINDS IS SAFETY, AND EVEN WITH THE <br />RESTRICTIONS WE PLACE ON SHELL SIZE WE FEEL THE PRESENT Sits <br />JUST IS NOT AS SAFE AS IT SHOULD BE. IF WE COULD GUARAN'iat <br />THAT EVERY ITEM WOULD PERFORM EXACTLY AS WE HOPE AND EXPECT <br />AND IF THERE WOULD BE A PROBLEM, THAT THE DISTANCE BETWEEN <br />EFFECT AND PEOPLE WOULD BE ADEQUATE WE WOULD HAVE THE BEST <br />OF WORLDS. BUT UNFORTUNATELY THAT IS NOT THE CASE. WHAT WE <br />ARE LOOKING FOR IS BETTER COMFORT FACTOR. WITH THAT I AM <br />ASKING THAT YOU SERIOUSLY LOOK INTO ANOTHER SITE THAT MIGHT <br />BE AVAILABLE FOR THE FIREWORKS. I. MYSELF. OR ANOTHER OF <br />OUR MEMBERS WOULD BE MORE THAN WILLING TO ASSIST YOU IN <br />DETERMINING THE ADEQUACY OF ANY POTENTIAL SITE. I SINCERELY <br />HOPE YOU WILL GIVE. THIS REQUEST VERY HIGH PRIORITY. WE LOCI: <br />FORWARD TO SERVING YOUR NEEDS NEXT YEAR WITH A FIREWORKS <br />SHOW THAT HAS FEW IF ANY CONSTRAINTS ON THE TYPES OF EFFECTS <br />WE CAN DISPLAY. <br />IF YOU NEED MORE INPUT FROM OUR ORGANIZATION AND WOULD Lii:: • <br />TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER FURTHER. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COI'iTACT <br />PIE EITHER AT WORK 448-85.13 OR AT HOME•!?2-20G1. <br />Sit/CEREL YOURS. <br />Ej <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.