Agenda Packets - 1989/10/16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

individual S There are four potential ?iabiitties ar disadvantagesan to organized collection of refuse. Organized collection reduces ni issues and could potentially adversely affect choice of garbage caitec:ors, requires additional municipal involve - Collection broaches anti-trust existing refuse Callection companies. Households that currently arrange with a hauler for refuse Choice, This the raulerlofinheindividuals more would no longer be able .o select. a survey by runs counter to the nat;Qvejdaf`szratcespdas{��? 8 Marev29, ??85, choice in the type and the Minnesota Carter far 5acial Research comp'- z en let thosshowe res�ondeassdAhapnowtselarfor , theirgarbagel canthaulerhwillingcent of the city decide, although some agree aniy it it reduces their cost. about 11 Percent of the population, or There was a s�all minority, e hauler, wanted to retain i`e^;iry their �cancerns. about 20 percent of the respondents who selec:zd their The gar. Rho felt strongly that they gastzd that 'his group he studied further to more involve^. in r ?:se nausz'noIds ardubus- Organizad collection will require municiaain raf with unorganized refuse collection to become if:i- 3ecause there is a great deal of satisfaction nnand Tresses about the ma.^.ner jr. which rersa is hanE?=_d, iis t may be d 'If it gin t broke, cult to explain why additional coverrmart incern. hethouszhOlds3CGSSaof the Municipalitizs will have to averteme :he concern. ; all why fix it'" Although the cast diffzren:iahe to is oat great, tha sum of t+reccaa be signir- diff,.ent market strucur_s , , tailection SYS- :he households in t!e city aver z pLriad ofi a !__r a 2 if Sc. paul 'rent to zn ar;an,z_d mil?tcn base- car ;cant. Lt izast S: �,ial in Carcouaxe pea. an annual S3'/'.ngs Qi.a 3 5i.:1� di:fere,• `oan 6a a661sirgle-family housing un..,, _nd span 6 .,mpnth' billing cost per household Per ,d with administration, :he contract, 3i111ng can be dore in cor- municiaalities .ai11 incur cof ass"'at ling Ci tax Statements and manitoriMg Pa.' , -c-1 ar ;pn as are msch ,+unction Aith other mun{cipal bt?Tines such as ? or utii'`y ' v the municipality rather Chan the waste hauler. i < jails. VatlOnLi stud{'eS ercunCyta yboutn9tve percent Or the less if hand, d b, casts b• -cadat,, Inc. Administration �edcon°r!c'. monitoring -a `he study 1 c total cost of t• ti region may be arfac:ed Haw organized collect;en is imclemented to dit r_ an Y by anti-trust law, this matter requ{res additional study. „A callecagn by rur{ci:Llities has the POtcrearl- se r �ni__� refuse collet:ion camoanles. An increase lmal?.'ilenLat{On of a g -',_ _r^ -e_d°A :C O,-fon tha SaMe tial :a ad•ierse?:/ 'r.smC_C;� S�tnz�a' 7ed be to COI' function. Consequently, fewer collection crews �pVihetherethis means a how organized collection lect refuse under an organized collection system.organized larly reduction in co itec:ian companies depends span Job on the side, may is implemented. art timenorSi scollecting wasS Of some te asuaejs, D those operating P be adversely affected. waste management system anany visionedby The implementation of the plan may work to offset ananized collec- Council's solid waste policy D as a result of Organ recyclables impacts upon the collection industcollection servicesensa for the reduction in the lion. The provis{on of collection services for yard waste, in th and household hazardous wastes may there is an opportunity for new nt labor force if organized collection were implemented by and waste compost sites or number of cities in the re ion Also, The expansion ar develaoment of new business ventures into management of he recycling iOn v{ties could 1ISO recyclables orac'esult ofSi cincreased _ incraise in us etha de, d for labor. M