My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/10/16
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/10/16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 11:16:16 AM
Creation date
4/23/2025 11:16:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/16/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A. DO C.iING <br />Pros <br />1. Continue bimonthly curbside pick up <br />2. Continued City Staff time <br />3. City Public relations - civic responsibility <br />4. Control location of drop off sites (landfill, RDF, etc.) <br />D. ORGANIZED COLLECTION <br />Pros <br />1. Uniform pick up of all waste <br />2. Less wear and tear on City streets <br />3. Lower safety risks <br />4. Possible combination of adjacent cities staff function <br />into one person <br />5. All residents have pick up (mandatory collection) <br />6. Deal with limited number of haulers <br />7. All pick up done on same day <br />8. Control location of drop off sites (landfill, RDF, etc.) <br />9. Haulers provide containers (through City) <br />C. LICENSE HAULERS <br />Pros <br />1. Minimal City Staff time/City involvement <br />2. Encourage free market system <br />3. No additional utility billing <br />4. Encourage haulers to educate public <br />5. Possible commercial properties Involved <br />6. Possible high density multiple family involved <br />7. Haulers provide containers (through City) <br />B. Haulers handle complaints <br />9. Control location of drop off sites (landfill, RDF, etc.) <br />10. No additional trucks <br />11. No negotiating contracts <br />12. License renewed each year <br />13. Can continue to subsidize program <br />14. Possible weekly pick up <br />15. All waste picked up on same day <br />16. Competition among haulers (hold prices down) <br />17. Weights still recorded <br />n <br />LJ <br />Cons <br />1. Not keeping up with changing times <br />2. City handles complaints <br />3. Yard waste not addressed <br />4. Does not include commercial property <br />5. Does not include high density residential property <br />6. Multiple trucks on streets at different times <br />7. Not consistent <br />Cons <br />1. Discourages free market system <br />2. Greater City involvement and time commitment <br />3. Change utility billing <br />4. Possible loss of dollars from County <br />5. Would not include commercial property <br />6. City handles complaints <br />7. Does not increase participation <br />B. Does not include high density residential property <br />Cons <br />1. No control on how waste is picked up <br />2. Perception that City is "pulling out,, <br />3. Multiple trucks on street at different times <br />4. No uniformity <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.