My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/11/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/11/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 11:18:51 AM
Creation date
4/23/2025 11:18:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/13/1989
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
l� 7-x - /�, <br />• MEMORANDUM <br />Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members <br />From :Ric Minetor, Director of <br />Public Works/City Engineer <br />Date <br />:November 9, 1989 <br />Subject:Dynamic <br />Acceptance sofninstalled ers JParking Lot Curb <br />from Dynamic Designers after ress <br />ith around the <br />Mr. eP . The <br />The attached letter was received <br />had a number of telephone discussions w <br />or site plan callcurb and gutter <br />ed for B6-18 utter is required on <br />parking lot. This type of concrete curb and gunits and on <br />all multi -family parking lots serving 7 or more lots serving Sato <br />commercial and industrial parking lots. Parking <br />6 unit buildings are required by code to have "6 inch by 18 inch <br />straight curb". The code does not specify the type of material. <br />ete formed <br />Fast practice has be n orequire in standard design manuals ofthe curb to be rMn/DOT- <br />curb of a type <br />18 <br />Mr. Cepress called and F sked t= be. usly approved sB6 t18 curb he 6 y and <br />straight curb in lieu o_ the P only required the 6 by 18 curb <br />' andtexplained he would need todprepare a revised site plan for <br />approval. <br />Prior to our reviewing and approving the revised site plan, Mr. <br />Cepress' asphalt contractor paved the parking lot and installed a <br />formed 6 inch asphalt curb. I called Mr. Cepress and explained <br />tter and that I felt the code implied the need <br />that this was not what I had concurred in for substitution of the <br />B6-18 curb and T utter. I also expressed my dissatisfaction <br />for concrete curb and g before we had a chance to review <br />with the installation proceeding but <br />the revised site plan, Mr. Ceproing ess itolcinst install he curb, known <br />that the asphalt company was c explained <br />that I felt this <br />requested bylCouncil. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.