My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/11/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/11/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 11:20:03 AM
Creation date
4/23/2025 11:20:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/27/1989
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-TY- ,-.? <br />MEMORANDUM <br />Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members <br />From :Ric Minetor, Director of�yOP�ub�l�iic Works <br />Date :November 21, 1989 ���2 <br />Subject :Street Light Installation on Spring Lake Road <br />8419 Spring Lake Road - Steve Melby <br />Attached is a petition for a street light on Spring Lake Road. <br />The petition does not meet the requirements of our resolution <br />regarding street light installation. The proposed location is <br />less than 250 feet from the street light at 8394 Spring Lake <br />Road. The street light installation policy (Resolution 1069 d <br />Resolution 1354) requires that street lights be least 400 feet <br />apart. If there is sufficient cause due to sharp curves, dead <br />ends, pedestrian crosswalks, vandalism, or other criteria, then <br />street lights may be installed at not less than 250 foot <br />spacings. A street light counld be installed between 8418 and <br />$430 Spring Lake Road and meet the minimum 250 foot spacing from <br />other street lights. I personally feel this area is fairly well <br />lit and question the effectiveness of a new installation at <br />preventing crime. I do not believe it would be beneficial for <br />traffic safety. The resident would still have the option of <br />installing a yard security light on his property (at his cost). <br />i recommend denial of this request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.