My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1990/06/18
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
Agenda Packets - 1990/06/18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 1:20:46 PM
Creation date
4/23/2025 11:40:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/18/1990
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br />The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities is now in its 16th year. During <br />its relatively short existence, the Association has experienced many diffi- <br />culties and challenges. Examples include the 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning <br />Act and the more recent debates over local government aid. <br />Despite predictions for the demise for general purpose organizations like <br />the Association, the AMM is now at an all-time high of 68 member cities, repre- <br />senting over 90 percent of the population in the seven -county metropolitan area. <br />The cities of the region apparently believe that they are getting a good value <br />for their membership dollars. <br />However, despite the successes of the past, the twelve members of this years <br />Mission and Membership Services Task Force have concluded that this is no time <br />to rest on our laurels. We face challenges from other city lobbying groups <br />whose interests are contrary to those of the metropolitan area, as well as a <br />generally hostile attitude by the State legislature toward cities. At the same <br />time, the complexity of governing the metropolitan area is increasing geometri- <br />cally, meaning that it is more important than ever to work together if we are to <br />effectively serve the citizens of our respective communities. <br />The Task Force concludes that in order to remain viable and relevant, the AMM <br />must become more proactive, more collaborative, more focused and more assertive. <br />The AMM provides the only meaningful vehicle for the cities of the metropoli- <br />tan area to express in a united voice the important perspective of local govern- <br />ment. The issues at stake are simply too important to abandon the playing field <br />and leave all the important decisions to others. <br />ve Association was originally formed out of several metropolitan area splinter <br />:roups who had originally felt that they had little in common, but came to <br />realize that the things they did have in common were far more than those that <br />divided them. The challenges of today are certainly no less than those that <br />faced our cities in the past. Our test will be whether we can continue to be an <br />effective voice for the collective interests of the cities in this metropolitan <br />area, and to pass that test will require two things: <br />1. A renewed ability and commitment to come together through our com- <br />mittees and 19-member Board of Directors to reach a consensus on <br />the critical issues that face us. <br />2. The ability to effectively, and with a united front, promote the <br />policies we do adopt to the Governor, the legislature, the <br />Metropolitan Council and the regional operating agencies. <br />The Mission and Membership Services Committee feels that the recommendations <br />set forth in this report will set us well on a course to accomplishing just <br />that. We commend it for your consideration and thoughtful action. <br />- 16 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.