My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1990/06/18
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
Agenda Packets - 1990/06/18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 1:20:46 PM
Creation date
4/23/2025 11:40:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/18/1990
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LOBBYING <br />Legislative policy adoption and lobbying have become the major focus for the <br />Association, growing steadily over the years. When the Association was formed <br />in 1974, it had two standing policy committees and 35 legislative policies. <br />Today the Association has five standing committees, and the membership has <br />adopted over 100 legislative policies for the current biennium. In addition, <br />several ad hoc study committees for specialized topics (i.e. land use legisla- <br />tion, metropolitan significance rules, group homes) have been formed in the past <br />few years. <br />Intrusion by the legislature into local affairs has increased dramatically in <br />recent years. At the same time, other municipal lobbying groups, most notably <br />the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, have aggressively promoted tax poli- <br />cies that are detrimental to the collective interests of the metropolitan area. <br />Consequently, the AMM lobbyists have been challenged to accomplish more and more <br />at the legislature, without any significant increase in resources. <br />Legislators with whom the Task Force met described our lobbying staff as com- <br />petent and well respected. At the same time, the legislators admitted that the <br />aggressive, and sometimes even abrasive tactics used by other municipal lobbying <br />groups have probably led to more success in accomplishing their agendas. In <br />response to these concerns, the AMM for the first time hired contract lobbyists <br />during the 1990 session. <br />Legislators expressed their frustration with the increasing regionalism of city <br />lobbying groups, and urged us to show a concern for the entire State at the same <br />time we more actively pursue the interests of the metropolitan cities. It was <br />also suggested that having a better data base for lobbying would be helpful in <br />pressing the AMM position. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />1. The AMM should seek to be seen as the organization with the authority and <br />credibility to speak⢠on behalf of a 1 cities in the seven -county metropoli- <br />tan area. <br />2. The AMM has become "spread too thin" in the number of policy issues it is <br />lobbying, and needs to limit active involvement to three types of issues: <br />a) Issues of concern only to metropolitan cities - i.e. interaction <br />with Metropolitan Council and operating agencies, Chapter 509 <br />Watershed Management Organizations, etc. <br />b) Statewide legislation with unique impacts in the metropolitan <br />area - i.e. land use, solid waste, tax increment financing, etc. <br />c) Statewide issues where the interests of the metropolitan area <br />may be different than, and at times even contrary to, those in the <br />remainder of the State - i.e. local government aid formulas <br />Specific suggestions for limiting our most active legislative agenda items <br />to these topics are included in the section on committees and the policy <br />adoption process. <br />5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.