Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council--- --. <br />January 12, 1987 'I - <br />Regular Meeting <br />----------------- <br />YJ--------- <br />Page Two <br />-:1 <br />Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve the consent <br />agenda, as amended, and waive the reading of the <br />resolutions. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />a Motion Carried <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the purpose of the <br />7.First Reading';: <br />proposed ordinance is to place additional regulations <br />of Ordinance{;jli,' <br />in the City of Mounds View regarding the sale of used <br />No. 417 <br />autos by private individuals. <br />Mayor Links asked that the wording be changed in Sub- <br />division 2, (b) to read "....property owner or occupant <br />of said property, and when applicable, if said owner or <br />occupant has a license issued....". <br />Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to approve the first <br />reading of Ordinance No. 417, as amended, amending <br />Chapter 81 of the Mounds View Municipal Code entitled <br />"Parking", and waive the reading. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion Carried::; <br />Director Thatcher explained that proposed Resolution <br />8. consideration <br />No. 2153 approves the final plat and development <br />of Resoluti.p�t:;`;•.' <br />agreement for the Red Oak Park subdivision. He stated <br />No. 2153 <br />the development agreement has security in the amount <br />;.•i <br />of $8,000, and it has been approved by the Planning <br />' <br />Commission. <br />Motion/Second: Blanchard/Linke to approve Resolution <br />No. 2153, approving the final plat and development <br />agreement for the Red Oak Park subdivision, and waive <br />the reading. <br />2 ayes 2 nays Motion Failed..,` <br />Councilmembers Quick and Wuori voted against the motion. <br />There was considerable discussion on the proposed <br />ponding for the subdivision. Councilmember Blanchard <br />asked if there had been any discussion with the owners <br />at 8180 Eastwood regarding the drainage swail that would <br />be in their back yard. <br />Director Thatcher stated he had spoken with them initially <br />several months ago, but he has not spoken to them since then <br />or informed them of what was proposed. He stated that <br />when he originally spoke to them, they seemed open to <br />improvements. <br />Councilmember Blanchard stated their approval would be <br />needed for the proposed ponding. <br />i <br />