Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council --ED <br />UN <br />V <br />August 10, 198� <br />APRegular Meeting 9 Page Two <br />Mayor Links explained the boulevard is County property. <br />He added the City has pointed out the problems when <br />they were in court before. <br />Attorney Meyers explained Williams is continuously <br />ta:dng.catF,Eie prntection readings and sometimes have <br />removed sections of the pipeline and sent them out to --; <br />Neighborvillt, IL for testing. He added the pipeline a3 <br />will also be lowered for the County Road I recon- <br />struction. He further explained there is a court <br />order that Williams is to keep the City informed on <br />what they are doing, .and their lack of doing so may £. <br />come back to haunt them some day. <br />Bill Frits, 8072 Lc:.g Lake RoaB, asked who ascertains <br />that the welds being made are sa:e. h' <br />Attorney Eleyers replied the Office of Pipeline Safety <br />is responsible, but he does not feel it has been done <br />properly, and the work has bean dovered up at times <br />without calling for an'inspection. He added the City =I <br />is still in court regarding che issue of safety of the <br />pipeline, and they should be back in court sometime€ <br />after November, and this issue of removal and recover- <br />ing of the line will be addressed than. He stated the <br />City has a court order prohibiting it from interferring <br />withthethe work being done on the ] ine. � <br />Steve Lzgell, no address given, stated he is anew <br />resident to Mounds View and would like to build a <br />garage that is larger than code permits and asked what <br />procedure must be followed. <br />Mayor Linke advised him to come into City Hall during <br />regular business hours, at which time someone on Staff <br />will outline for him the procedure to be followed. He <br />stated it takes approximately 30 days for the process, <br />and he must go before the Plann;ng Commission with his <br />varia ce reguebt. <br />Councilmember Hankner asked that Item F be removed 7. Cof <br />onsenalAgenda; <br />''- for discussion. <br />notion/Second: Hankner%Blanchard to approve the <br />consent agenda, minus Item F, and waive the reading <br />of the resolutions. <br />Motion Carried;; <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Councilmember Hankner stated that ^ince the Council <br />has not had an opportunity to review the RFP's on <br />Item F, she would prefer not taking action at this <br />time and discussing it at the next agenda session. <br />It was the conconsus of the Council to discuss the item <br />at the next agenda session. <br />