Laserfiche WebLink
page 4 I August 10, 1987 <br />Snow removal costs have been budgeted at 1985-10 and are based <br />upon historical averages. The winter emount5oE9snowafallgcounted <br />somewhat as it had an abnormally hog would have <br />should this estimate prove to be too low contingency <br />to be drawn down, <br />The Street Maintenance Plan provi" for a lessor amount of <br />overlay work in 1988 compared toversus $,soao00nwhichnhas $been <br />00 <br />has been budgeted for next y <br />Lj <br />budgeted for Luis year. <br />Recr_ e_ ++form• "COrgenizatinn of the Parks and Recreation <br />position is reflected in lower 1988 personnel costs <br />Department and the resultant elimination of the Recreation <br />Supervisors p toviding <br />in the Recreation Department. Increased costs of the building <br />coordinator at the Edgewood Community Center and p <br />entertainment fcr the new Senior Citizen s Club at Messiah <br />Lutheran Church result'in an increase of $1,800 in the Grants 8 <br />Subsidies Account. <br />ing <br />to the Recreation Activity Fund. Because of <br />Staff does not feel that the full cost of recteation programmnot <br />is being chargedprogramming <br />is this the true and correct costs Of of <br />ins p 9 <br />known. At the present time <br />are chargedotosthe Recreation Activity <br />leee <br />materials and supp <br />Fund. Items paid for IJ ouro ramat of einclude: Fthe recreationrelatbrcchure <br />directly to recreation <br />new3letter, flyers and not <br />regarding <br />included in the City <br />recreation programs, the costs rams"areloffereddthere,scosts of <br />Edgewood and Pinewood when programs ;i <br />staff time devoted to making brochures a fJ7er`anningsofa� an of <br />participants, supervision of instructors a;9 a ro rams be <br />programs. Staff recommends all costs of rT doingn p 8 <br />charged to the Recreation Activity Fun(* so the true <br />roviding recreation i'r <br />and correct costs If pationogramsFundlwillbe kahow <br />If this recommendation is followed the Recre <br />a loss unless fees are increased. The Parks Recrea <br />Director does not favor an increase in p 9 ivity Fund to <br />concur that fees �hc-old not be increased a transfer could be <br />budgeted from the General <br />Findto thisFhayRecreation <br />publicAwi11 know how <br />offset an operating, ro rams. The de:A sion can <br />much taxpayers subsidize recreation por9to increase rates. At <br />then be made to c,)ntinue the subsidyOsts <br />present that deinetweenmade <br />the Generaltandsince <br />Recreation fActivity <br />ion <br />programs are split <br />Funds. Staff seeks Council direction in this matter. <br />lower Parks because the newly <br />Parks. Salaries are budgeted <br />hired Maintenance 11worker Is andato ttempteto better maintain <br />ta in <br />maintainr , <br />materials and suppliesa in city Parks. The subsidy to Lakeside `s+ <br />equipment and building' Lake Park. This <br />Park has been increased from <br />$10#000 <br />offspring A similar <br />increase will be req ears. <br />is the first increase in three y <br />