Laserfiche WebLink
FL-11. Regulation of Incinerator Emissions <br />r <br />In Minnesota, permits granted for mass burn and RDF facilities <br />require substantial application of pollution controls to limit release <br />of harmful substances. To the extent that these latest efforts in <br />congress and at the Environmental p_otection Agency reflect the need for <br />additional efforts to protect the environment from serious affects of <br />unregulated discharges, the League agrees that such assurances should be <br />obtained to the greatest extent possible to protect the health and <br />well-being of individuals, communities, and the environment. <br />While recycling and :caste minimization policies promote a healthy <br />environment and can be utilized to reduce the need for landfills, those <br />approaches alone cannot meet the demand for solid waste disposal <br />management. <br />According to a science advisory panel study of current EPA methods cf 4' <br />dealing with incinerator emission issues, that agency reeds to further <br />examine actual human health risks from ash produced from incinerator <br />operations. <br />At the same time, legislation introduced in both the House and Senate <br />would regulate ash by-products as hazardous waste under the Resource <br />Conservation and Recovery Act, as well as to bring municipal <br />incinerators under Clean Air Act regulation. Senate sponsors favor <br />stringent regulation of materials said to he toxic by-products of such <br />mass burning or resource recovery methods. Emission limits on air <br />pollutants such as particulates; acid gases, heavy metals, sulfur and <br />nitrogen oxides, etc., based on best demonstrated achievable control <br />technologies, would be required under the Senate bill (S. 1565). <br />The Eouse bill would require application of environmental regulation <br />listed above for municipal incinerators. Other legislation also <br />introduced in the Senate (S. 1566) would require EPA to develop methods <br />to test the toxicity of incinerator -produced ash by-products as well as <br />to test for potential exposure. The objective would be to require local <br />incinerator operators to report results of ash testing and to develop <br />plans to dispose of the ash under provisions of the Resource <br />Conservation and Recovery Act. <br />Areas of concern for cities include the prospect of expanded require- , <br />ments to meet in order to comply with Clean Air Act standards for new <br />potential pollutants identified by either Congress or EPA. It is <br />- 7� - <br />