My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1987/11/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
Agenda Packets - 1987/11/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2025 10:24:45 AM
Creation date
4/28/2025 10:18:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/9/1987
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI <br />FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR <br />DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1987 <br />SUBJECT: PARK DEDICATION FEE AND LETTER OF CREDIT FOR <br />MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK <br />Representatives of Everest Development have requested the <br />opportunity to appear before the Council at your <br />September 21, 1987 Agenda Session to discuss the Park <br />Dedication Fee and Letter of Credit being requested by Staff <br />during contract negotiations for this project. <br />As you know, Staff has taken the position that the Park <br />Dedication Fee of $2501 <br />000, which is the amount called for <br />in the City's ordinances. Staff has taken the position, that <br />the full amount of the fee will be paid by the Developer as <br />it is required by the Code and the City is providing the <br />Developer with substantial assistance in this project, <br />namely tax increment financing and the Park Dedication Fee <br />should be considered the City's fee for providing this <br />assistance. The Developer has taken tha position that a <br />$250,000 fee, although it is a fee amount they have known <br />for several months, is excessive and would place extreme <br />burden on the project and will be requesting the Council <br />authorize a lower fee amount. Staff would not recommend <br />that the fee of $260,000 be reduced. <br />+� With respect to the Letter of Credit being required for this <br />project as part of the tax increment financing agreement, <br />Staff his taken the position that a Letter of Credit in the <br />amount of approximately $1,000,OUO will be required in the <br />4th, 5th end 6th year of the debt service of the bond issue <br />which will be the first three years that principle and <br />interest is paid on the bond issued. The amount is <br />equivalent to the annual principle and interest payment for <br />the bonds and staff feels that this is a reasonable amount <br />of security needed by the City to assure us that buildings <br />are up, occupied and paying property taxes. Staff has also <br />taken the position that this Letter of Credit can be <br />contractually obligated at the time that the agreement is <br />signed but will not need to be provided until just prior to <br />the beginning of the 4th year so that the Developer will not <br />need to be paying interest on the Letter of Credit during <br />the time it is not needed as a Letter of Credit is handled <br />by lending institutions as a loan upon which interest is <br />charged. The Devaloper is taking the position that due to <br />lending limits they will be able to obtain one Letter of <br />Credit equal to approximately $8U0,000 and it is not their <br />desire to go to a second lending institution to obtain the <br />additionai $200,000. Based on discussions that the Staff <br />has had with our consultants in this matter and a general <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.