Agenda Packets - 1987/03/16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

g DOCKETS UNIT PAGE TWENTY-TWO MARCH 24, 1987 As a "one call" system is currently required for gas pipe- line system operators and appears to be a reasonable means for dealing with incidents of this nature, a requirement that hazardous liquid pipeline operators make use of such a system would not appear to be unreasonable. Questions: (a) Should "one call" systems be required to the exclusion of alternative programs? Response: The Minnesota Governur's Commission on Pipeline Safety evaluated various options to improving the means by which agencies are notified of excavation occurring in the vicinity of a pipeline or the failure of a pipeline and concluded a "one call" system is the most efficient and effective. In fact, systems that could be adapted for this purpose are currently available throughout the nation. (b) Should participation be required in areas of low population, such as class 1 and 2 locations for gas pipelines or rural areas for hazardous liquid pipelines, where the cost of participation may exceed the potential benefits? Response: Participation should be required for operators of all types of pipelines as well as variout utility system operators. A system of this nature is not just designed to limit hazards to the public but also the environment which is an irreplaceable resource and, therefore, participation should be required irrespective of the location of the pipeline. 18. Fro osal: Provide for increased federal oversight in design and construction of pipelines. (HR 262) Study the need for certification of pipeline and construction personnel. (MN REP REC. 5.6) Response: Federal regulation of pipelines exists out of concern that such systems are safe and do not pose a threat to the public or the environment. How can the regulator be sure that the