My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1987/06/01
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
Agenda Packets - 1987/06/01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2025 11:49:52 AM
Creation date
4/28/2025 11:49:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/1/1987
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
state and local authority before the Supreme Court of the United <br />States. In the rare case (perhaps one a year) that reaches the <br />Court in which the interests of state and local anvernments <br />diverq.!, the Legal Center does not participate. <br />6. Why the focus on the Supreme Court?` <br />A Supreme Court case differs from litigation at lower levels <br />of the judicial system in several important respects. The <br />Supreme Court makes law for the nation; what the Supreme Court <br />decides not only governs the disposition of the particular case, <br />and possibly a great many other cases as well, but provides a <br />standard of conduct for individuals and government officials for <br />the future. The very fact that the case has reached the highest <br />court in the land demands the very best advocacy obtainable. <br />When a case reaches the Supreme Court, the issues have been <br />distilled to one or more clearly defined points of law, requiring <br />careful concentration and techniques very different from those <br />that may be effective at trial or in an intermediate appellate <br />court. The type of issue considered by the Supreme Court differs <br />from the issues that typically control the disposition of cases <br />at lower levels. In addition, the Justices have an unparalleled <br />depth of knowledge of constitutional issues that demands a high <br />degree of expertise on the part of attorneys appearing before <br />them. Special training is required to compress the presentation <br />of complex issues into the limited time allowed by the Court, <br />which is generally reduced by questions from the Justices. The C <br />stakes are high, and state and local government attorneys are <br />frequently opposed by the best legal talent in the country. <br />7. Do the activities of the State and Local Legal Center du <br />No. The Legal Center was established to meet a recognized <br />unmet need, discussed previously. <br />The National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) is the <br />primary service organization of the state attorneys general; it <br />provides substantial assistance only to its members and their <br />staffs. The National Institute of Municipal Law Officers <br />(NIMLO), in which municipalities participate through their chief <br />legal officers, assists those municipal attorneys through a <br />variety of programs. State agencies and many cities are fre- <br />quently represented by attorneys who are not served by NAAG or <br />NIMLO. The Legal Center has a number of programs designed to <br />assist these attorneys. More important, the Legal Center's <br />programs advance the common concerns of state and local govern- <br />ments when cases before the Supreme Court of the United States <br />will affect their interests and their authority. <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.