My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1987/07/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
Agenda Packets - 1987/07/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2025 12:27:11 PM
Creation date
4/28/2025 12:27:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/13/1987
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council 1 P yyy , July 1987 <br />Regular Meeting 11 P Page rive <br />D <br />--------------------------- -�---------------- <br />zoning and environmental aspects and have done <br />everything they can to meet the desires of the City. <br />Councilmember Hankner replied that just because <br />MnDOT has authorized a driveway out onto Highway 10 <br />does not mean that is a wise decision, and she does <br />not agree with all the actions they have taken in <br />the past. <br />Councilmember Blanchard stated she has been concerned <br />with the traffic problems from the very beginning, and <br />she does not want to be put in the position of having <br />to explAin why a gas station was allowed there, after <br />an accident occurs at that intersection. <br />Councilmember Quick stated he had voted against allowing <br />Binder Care in that location when he was on the Planning <br />Commission and he feels there is too much traffic at <br />that intersection now, and does not feel that is a good <br />location for that type of business. <br />Attorney Meyers clarified the requirements of the Code <br />for granting a Conditional Use Permit, stating that it <br />cannot be related to an economic argument. He stated <br />the Courts have ruled that denying a conditional use <br />permit when the zoning is proper would be arbitrary and <br />capricious. Ile also reminded the Council a 4/5 vote <br />would be required to grant a Conditional Use Permit. <br />Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to deny a Conditional <br />Use Permit to Amoco Oil Co., 2800 Highway 10. <br />Councilmember Hankner - aye <br />Councilmember Blanchard - aye <br />Councilmember Wuori - aye <br />Councilmember Quick - aye Motion Carried <br />Mayor Linke - nay <br />Mayor Linke stated he could not support the motion, <br />and he feels the studies done have shown it would <br />fit into the area. <br />The developer of the property,,who did not identify <br />himself, stated that he had originally proposed to <br />build a Crown Auto store on the site, but was told <br />there was not enough parking spaces, and then came <br />up with an alternate plan, and was again told there <br />was not enough room for parking. Ile expressed his <br />frustration in trying to work with the City and <br />pointed out that whatever development takes place <br />there will increase the traffic at that .intersection. <br />He added he is very upset and gets the feeling from <br />the City that he cannot develop that piece of <br />property. <br />Mayor Linke stated the property can be developed, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.