Laserfiche WebLink
VEOilecember <br />14, 1987 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Regular Meeting <br />---------------------------------------------------.` <br />Page Eight <br />g <br />---------------- <br />Councilmember Wuori stated that due to the substantial <br />changes that had been made to the preliminary plat, <br />to back to square one. <br />felt it was a much simpler way go <br />information is very technical, and the <br />She added the <br />Council is not engineers, and they need to call on <br />experts for their opinion. <br />Mayor Linke stated the Council is not denying the use <br />and a <br />of the land, but they are caught between a rock <br />look at the <br />hard spot, and they need to start over and <br />that when it is presented again, <br />new information, so <br />everything should go through smoother and faster, and <br />the ordinance requirements will be met. <br />Councilmember Quick stated he agreed with the comments <br />Linke, and he <br />made by Councilmember Wuori and Mayor <br />deny the prelimir <br />felt the Council must yplattonight <br />and allow the developer to come back with <br />proposal. <br />Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to remove this item <br />10. Remove from <br />Table and <br />from the table. <br />Consideratin <br />of Sewer and <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />Water Coac- <br />tors Li.c 3-It <br />for Schul ea; <br />Plumbing <br />Motion Carried <br />Mayor Linke explained this item was removed from the <br />was <br />consent agenda at the November 23 meeting, and <br />discussed at the last agenda session. <br />Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to deny the sewer and <br />water contractors license renewal for Schulties <br />Plumbing. <br />Motion Failed <br />2 ayes 2 naps <br />Councilmember Wuori and Mayor Linke voted against the <br />motion. <br />City attorney Meyers advised that as the motion dial <br />it had failed, and if a <br />not have a majority vote, <br />was to be granted, that motion would <br />license renewal <br />also need a majority vote. <br />Councilmember Quick stated he had had previous <br />experience with this contractor, which was very <br />feel he should be allowed <br />negative, and he does not <br />to do business in the City. <br />Mayor Linke noted no other .omplaints have been received <br />