Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council ; 1 i r <br />Regular Meeting --- -*- <br />------------------------- <br />Mr. Senden stated one of the items Barr had requested <br />additional information on was the phosphorous stripping <br />capacity of the wetland. <br />Steve Thatcher, of Merila and Associates, presented <br />the Council with a report detailing the phosphorous <br />production and phosphorous stripping capacity of the <br />wetland, and he made a lengthy presentation of the <br />data in the report. <br />ensive <br />mr. Senden stated that in would like view of ethe *City tdata <br />o <br />they have presented, they ftheir analysis, <br />submit it to Barr Engineering or <br />and he added they would also like Barr to submit a <br />full report, in writing, as was asked for by the <br />Council originally. He as <br />that when Harstad Company <br />he <br />had agreed to the two extensions, it was into the <br />understanding that Bartheocitizenslooking <br />Staff, and <br />concerns expressed by opportunity to review Barr's <br />they would now like an nt <br />findings, and have the benefit of auestedpendeCouncil <br />ne <br />consultants review. Mr. Senden req es the <br />review and consider the w data, all the Chang <br />developer has made so far, and the Barr Engineering <br />report, before making any decision. He added hew/uld <br />also like additional time to study the Barr repY <br />as well as their responses to what Harstad Company <br />asked <br />has done to meet their of ti et asMa'period nduring <br />for a 30 day extension of time, <br />which Staff and the consultants could review the <br />additional information. <br />d the second extension rosk <br />ed <br />Mayor Linke clarifieand <br />for so that the Counularcaddress <br />meeting, whichould would be <br />be <br />take action at a reg <br />cable cast, and have minutes <br />has asaid they awould tgive <br />that while and <br />Company <br />wetland in exchange for the requested variancis <br />e, <br />Chapter 48.05, Subd. 4 states the developereadfrom the <br />required to give an easement; and <br />Chapter. <br />Mr. Senden explained they would give a warrantee deed <br />rather than an easement. requested <br />Mayor Linke stated that while Mr. S nwouldaneedcloser <br />a 30 day time extension, <br />to 60 to 90 days to review all theandwscheduletioHe <br />considering the uPcc._.`ngto revw, <br />added there is a great deal of data <br />over what wasand <br />the plan has changed considerably <br />originally presented. <br />December 14, 1987 <br />Page Five <br />