Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City <br />February <br />Regula---------- Council-- � --- Page -- ------even-,-1988.fU"APPPOW-V <br />"otionlSecond: Hankner/Wuori to approve the first read- 17. First Reading:' <br />"Ing of Ordinance No. 436, adopting the revision and of Ordinance <br />recodification of Mounds View Ordinances to be known as No. 436 <br />the "Municipal Code of Mounds View", and waive the <br />reading. <br />5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried'' <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the proposed 18. First Reading <br />ordinance would accept the rezoning of the Mounds View of Ordinance <br />Business Park site from I-1 and B-3 to PUD. No. 437 <br />Motion/Second, Hankner/BlancharC to have the first <br />reading of Ordinance No. 437, amending the Municipal <br />Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 41, entitled <br />"Specific Rezonings", and waive the reading. <br />5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />Motion/Second: Hankner/Wuori to adopt Resolution <br />No. 2292, as amended, approving a conditional use permit <br />to construct a public facility in an R-1 district for <br />the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission at 2345 <br />County Road H, and waive the reading. <br />r <br />ayes 0 nays <br />There was discussion on the amendment to the resolution, <br />with the Council agreeing that it should contain a fourth <br />contingency, for maintaining the external appearance of <br />the fencing and building. <br />19. Consideration <br />cf Resolution <br />No. 2292 <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that after several 20 <br />months of negotiations an agreement has been reached with <br />Teamsters Local 320, and he briefly reviewed the settle - <br />merits made and asked Council approval, <br />Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve Resolution No. <br />2251, apprcving the 1989 labor agreement between the <br />City of Mounds View and Teamster's Local 320, and waive <br />the reading. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley updated the Council on the <br />status cf the application from Bob Waste for a liquor <br />license transfer, stating that Mr. Waste does not want <br />o amend the application or withdraw it, even after <br />being advised that it would be denied as it stands. <br />He explained that Attorney Meyers has confirmed that <br />Chapter 100.06 (2), (f.) prohibits the issuance of a <br />Motion Carried. <br />Consideration <br />of Resolut: -n-1. <br />No. 2291 <br />Motion Carried. <br />21. Consideration <br />of Application <br />for Liquor <br />License <br />Transfer <br />