Agenda Packets - 1988/04/18 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r.,--- �`]' April 11, 1988 Mounds View City Council S page Two = Regular Meeting °"" ------- ----------------------------------------------------- ---- ---- ---^ Councilmember Hankner explained Staff is gathering l information regarding what other Cities have done and the authority they have given to their boards. She stated she has not had time to draft anything for Mounds View yet, but hopes `o work on it by next week, and she would like help fro,a the residents to put this together. She also added that the board would have to be created by ordinance, which will take some time, but she would hope to have it in place by the end of May. Councilmember Hankner requested certain items be moved 6. Consideration uo on the agenda, as she had to leave the meeting by of Petition 8:30 PM to return to work. for Street- lights on Wood Councilmember Hankner reported there were differences lawn Drive in opinion of the residents on ahcre they would like a streetlight placed, and she would like further time to work on L.iis to come to an agreement that would --ati-afy nvPryone. - Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to table this item. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Attorney Meyers updated the Council on the Amoco Oil lawsuit, explaining that the Court has issued an order and has ruled in favor of the request of Amoco for a conditional use permit for construction of a filling station on Highway ]0 at Silver Lake Road. He stated the Planning Commission. had recommended approval of the conditional use permit, but the Council had reviewed it and denied it. Attorney Meyers advised that *he Court has ordered the City to issue a conditional use permit pursuant to the ordinance, and therefore a resolution has been prepared for approval, which would include the develop;,ent agreement, which will accompany the «� t conditional use permit. !fe further exyiai„— of the considerations Amoco has agreed to is to dismiss the civil rights action against the City, which could possibly have been very costly to the City. Attorney Meyers stated he had reviewed the case to see whether an appeal would be adviseable, and he could not recommend it in this instance, and it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to overturn the Court's finding, as it was a legal decision based on the law. He pointed out the zoning was proper, and the issue was granting the conditional use permit.