Laserfiche WebLink
Barr <br />&V;rwirg Caruav <br />7803 Gkarol Road <br />"OfteM"'. MN 55435 <br />6121830-0555 <br />March 16, 1988 <br />Mr, Donald Pauley <br />City Administrator <br />City of Mounds 2 <br />View <br />2401 Highway <br />Mounds Viewr 10 5511 <br />Re: Dynamic Deaignere Wood law Drive Site plan <br />Dear Mr. Pauley: request of the j <br />port has been prepared at the compliance V <br />The following letter 1� of evaluating the level of <br />Ian with Chapters 48, l and <br />Mounds View for the purpose me evaluation <br />City of Woodlsm Drive site P Ordinance). <br />of the Dynamic Designers Municipal Code (The <br />49A of the nbunds View <br />process included review o`_: <br />A8, 49, and 49A of I -.,a Vnvelopmew enttrsite�.ce tio. 318 <br />° %�iap•cre r,) ,,,ed d- blicetfon <br />n Wetland boundaries at the p P - December 1988. <br />o The Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District P' <br />Study prepared for the City of Mounds View <br />"City of Mounds View Wetland Inventory r <br />a o Flood Insurance to the Dynamic Designerz <br />`. September 21 1982. related <br />o Correspondence and submittals August l0, 1980. <br />site. Dynamic Designer e arch 14, 1983 and <br />The Drainage Plan submittenamic Designers dated <br />° Site P Mars <br />° plans submitted by Dy January 121 1988. <br />w Rice Creek watershed District Wetland YreeeDecember�1987tnthrough <br />the period aragrapha has <br />+ is the following P related <br />The evaluation was conducted d••resuing r0 oeed development and <br />February 1988. D>scuseion here then ps p requirements of <br />been restricted ac°toabeaincomplete or 'in conflict with t'e <br />submittals aPP- <br />the Ordinance* wetland zoning district- <br />-thin <br />development <br />uire subdivision of one 28,000 square foot lot into <br />The pr_posed development su within the on wetland. The <br />The developmenr.+••-- - fill iu �•I a ras of existing •_+• 14.000 <br />placement °f ro osed will be two lots appzox•W--- <br />two iota end P ,ant ae p P <br />result of the developwith lot width and structure setback distance from the <br />square feet in size, identified. <br />wetland each less than 100 feet. were <br />minimum lot <br />Six areas of potential conflict with the ozdiImlsize, Phosphorus <br />vetlands, P <br />Those areas included requirements related re minimum lot ui-.,ments. <br />of <br />width, minimum setback distance <br />m atererunofftandtflood 'height rtqui:: <br />stripping capacrty, S o <br />