Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CONHiSSION <br />RESOLUTION NO. 229-88 <br />PAGE THREE <br />l_I <br />WHEREAS, Chapter 48.06, Subd. 4(3) requires that following <br />information as part of the wetland alteration permitting process; <br />1. The tuna period for commencement and nompletion of the <br />deve :pmcnt including time for staging of development, <br />if applicable. <br />2. Design specification and plan for all sediment and <br />erosion control measures as well as all grading and <br />drainage appertenances and practices; and <br />WHEREAS, the developer has not provided the required <br />information such as the location of the temporary road nor the <br />time period for the commencement of the development including <br />time periods for staging; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission would recommend denial of <br />the watland alteration permit based on the insuffi.:ient <br />information on the revised phosphorus calculations and on the <br />construction timing and temporary haul road; and <br />WHEREAS, the developer has requested a variance from the <br />minimum lot size-20,000 square feet and minimum lot width-125 <br />feet as measured at the building setback line and the 100 foot <br />�. setback; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and Staff have reviewed <br />this request and found that there are no exceptional or <br />extraordinary circumstances which apply to the properties which <br />do not apply generally to other propertios in the same zone or <br />vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other <br />circumstances over which the owners of the property, since <br />enactment of this Code, have had no control; and <br />WHEREAS, furthermore, the Planning Commission and Staff <br />has found that the request is net the minimum variance which <br />would alleviate the hardship; economic conditions alone shall not <br />be considered a hardship; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission would recommend denial of <br />the variance requests for lot size, lot width and the 100 foot <br />setback; and <br />WHEREAS, the developer has requested a conditional use <br />permit for working in a flood plain; and <br />WHEREAS, the City's engineering consultant has reviewed <br />the development proposal and found nc% adverse affect upon the <br />flood plain; and <br />