My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2025/06/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Minutes - 2025/06/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2025 2:17:36 PM
Creation date
6/25/2025 2:16:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
6/9/2025
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 9, 2025 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />Administrator Zikmund reported the slab would be 2,000 square feet in size. <br /> <br />Council Member Clark asked how the wall within the outdoor studio would be oriented. Public <br />Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson reported the concrete slab would run east/west and <br />the wall would run north/south. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Clark/Gunn. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 10101, <br />Approving the Cost Proposal from Cornerstone Concrete for the installation of the concrete slab <br />for the Fitness Court. <br /> <br />Council Member Smith reported this project came in after the Parks Master Plan and she opposed <br />the project. She indicated the original estimate was $20,000 to $30,000 and now the City would <br />be spending $55,290. She discussed the expense that would be spent on the zip line to have it taken <br />down and moved to another park. She supported the City addressing resident concerns prior to <br />spending funding on this project. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause clarified none of this project was included in the 2025 budget. He <br />indicated he was originally opposed to this project because the Council did not receive a <br />resounding recommendation from the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Commission. However, he <br />noted he would be supporting this Resolution because the majority of the Council supported this <br />project moving forward. <br /> <br />Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson discussed how the cost for construction was <br />on the rise, not just concrete work, but in all trades. <br /> <br />Council Member Clark reported she reached out to the local cross fit gym owner and understood <br />they were very excited about this new space. She indicated they were interested in holding a free <br />event once a month for the community. <br /> <br />Mayor Lindstrom stated he understood the up-front costs were higher than expected, but he <br />believed there was great value in having this fitness court in the park. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Smith) Motion carried. <br /> <br />C. Resolution 10102, Approving the Cost Proposals for the Concrete and <br />Electrical work for the Tribute Park. <br /> <br />Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson requested the Council approve the cost <br />proposals for the concrete and electrical work for the Tribute Park. He explained part of the park <br />would include installing concrete sidewalks to reach the granite monuments with lighting on the <br />granite monuments. He reported after speaking with vendors, the concrete work low bid came in <br />at $77,300 and the electrical work low bid came in at $220,720. It was noted all of the lighting <br />would be LED. He reviewed images of the proposed park and recommended approval of the <br />concrete and electrical work for Tribute Park. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause asked how much funding has been raised for the Tribute Park. City
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.