Laserfiche WebLink
Item No: 04 <br /> SAT Meeting Date: July 28, 2025 <br /> MIGC-T�Ws VIE I�r Type of Business: Council Business <br /> City Administrator Review: <br /> City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> To: Honorable Mayor and Mounds View City Council <br /> From: Kribashini Moorthy, AICP, Stantec, City Planner <br /> Evan Monson, AICP, Stantec, City Planner <br /> Item Title/Subject: Second Reading of Approval for Detached ADU Zoning <br /> Amendment <br /> Request: Zoning Code Amendments <br /> Introduction: <br /> The City Council directed staff to review the regulation of accessory dwelling units (ADUs). <br /> Under the existing code, ADUs are permitted only when they are attached to an existing single- <br /> family residence. The city code refers to these as and ADU (addition) or an ADU (internal), see <br /> the figures from § 160.087 and 160.088 of the city code below. <br /> F <br /> Figure 2:An example of an 'external'ADU,referred to in code as an ADU <br /> Figure 1:An example of an ADU(internal). (addition). <br /> An ADU (internal) is a permitted accessory use, while an ADU (addition) is a conditional use <br /> under the current code. Detached ADUs are currently not permitted, though the city previously <br /> reviewed allowing detached ADUs in both 2016 and 2023. In 2023, the Planning Commission <br /> recommended amending the City Code to allow detached ADUs as a conditional use. Due to a <br /> vacancy on the Council at that time, further consideration was tabled. The Council recently <br /> expressed renewed interest in revisiting whether detached ADUs should be permitted within the <br /> city. <br /> Past Meetings: <br /> The City of Mounds View convened a work session on June 2, 2025, that included participation <br /> from City staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council. There was extensive dialogue <br /> regarding the potential allowance of detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs), including a <br /> review of practices in peer and neighboring municipalities, as well as the broader implications of <br /> permitting or prohibiting such units. Following this discussion, there was consensus in favor of <br />