My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2026/01/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
Minutes - 2026/01/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2026 10:19:19 AM
Creation date
2/10/2026 9:09:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
1/26/2026
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 26, 2026 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />begin making positive progress. He stated in the two events that occurred over the weekend, his <br />officers were on scene with their body cameras rolling. He reported at the end of the day, his <br />officers would continue to be on scene to ensure people remained safe. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs reviewed a memo of options available to the City Council, which included <br />draft ordinances. He stated the last three weeks have been unprecedented times. He indicated his <br />office represents 75 different cities and his firm was trying to address this issue. He commented <br />on the memo he provided to the Council when it came to what they can and cannot do. He reported <br />he put together an ordinance that had a very broad spectrum that would require anyone operating <br />as law enforcement in Mounds View has to operate like the local police officers. He indicated <br />these provisions may be challenged by the federal government. He stated the goal of this ordinance <br />was to provide transparency. He commented further on what local staff members can do. He <br />discussed how people are trying to work through this issue and there have been communications <br />between the governor and the president, which was a positive thing. However, the reality is, the <br />City Council controls how law enforcement is conducted in the City of Mounds View and the <br />proposed ordinance would assist with setting regulations for all law enforcement activities in the <br />community. <br /> <br />Prosecuting Attorney Katrina Joseph introduced herself to the City Council. She discussed the <br />federal court lawsuit that was heard today in Minnesota by Judge Hernandez. She reported on <br />January 12 the State of Minnesota, city of Minneapolis and the city of St. Paul filed a lawsuit <br />against the Department of Homeland Security as to how it was carrying out operation Metro Surge. <br />She indicated there was a request for a temporary restraining order. She explained on Friday the <br />city of Golden Valley received some communication from the Attorney General’s office asking <br />for suburban law enforcement agencies to file an amicus brief. She stated she heard from the <br />Golden Valley prosecutor around 4:30 p.m. on Friday and on Saturday morning after the ICE <br />shooting in South Minneapolis there was an emergency meeting of the Hennepin County City <br />Managers and at this meeting the City Administrators indicated they would like her office to file <br />supporting briefs. She inquired if the City Council would like to also file an amicus brief on behalf <br />of the City of Mounds View. She reviewed the five items addressed within the amicus brief noting <br />it was limited in scope. <br /> <br />Prosecuting Attorney Joseph commented on a current case that was being heard against a US <br />citizen who has a wife with valid status. The wife has indicated to the advocates at Tubman that if <br />she cooperates with prosecution, he will divorce her and turn her over to ICE. She indicated she <br />takes her job very seriously and discussed how impossible it was to prosecute a domestic violence <br />case without a victim present in court. She stated if victims are worried about being picked up by <br />ICE in court, they will not come forward. She commented further on how the jury pools were being <br />impacted by what was happening in the community. <br /> <br />Prosecuting Attorney Joseph reported there was a lot of anger and fear in the community with how <br />local law enforcement was not keeping people safe. She requested the City Council vote to join <br />the amicus brief. <br /> <br />Mayor Lindstrom stated he was concerned with the fact the BCA was not allowed to participate in <br />the investigations. He indicated there was no accountability for the federal agents, which was very
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.