My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-10-23 Agenda & Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
1997-10-23 Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2026 3:28:27 PM
Creation date
4/10/2026 3:27:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br /> Linteroffic <br /> • MEMORANDUM <br /> to: Computer Software Team of Authorities <br /> from: Mary Saarion <br /> subject: Info re. Athletic field permits procedures <br /> date: September 15, 1997 <br /> This past week I visited seven of our neighboring communities to hear about and observe first <br /> hand their procedures for athletic field permit procedures. The seven cities that I visited include: <br /> New Brighton, Shoreview, Arden Hills, Roseville, Blaine, Fridley, and Spring Lake Park. Of <br /> those seven cities, only one of the cities use a computerized system for field permits, even though <br /> all cities are computerized and use various computer programs for registrations, league <br /> scheduling, facility scheduling, etc. I asked each and every department representative why they <br /> didn't use a computerized field permit system. A variety of reasons were given. Reasons <br /> included that the computerized system is too cumbersome, is not user nor customer friendly and <br /> does not improve on the manual procedure. The manual procedure is faster, more flexible, allows <br /> for quick changes, takes little or no training and persons need not have a computer to schedule, <br /> the overall schedule can be seen with a single glance and the information provided to the customer <br /> is much simpler than the computer confirmation. <br /> The City of Shoreview has just purchased and updated all hardware to accommodate <br /> version of a scheduling system. They did not have a non-windows version prior to this new <br /> dow <br /> package, but did scheduling manually similar to all the other cities visited. Because their windows <br /> version requires speedy computers with large memories, all those using the system had to have <br /> hardware upgrades. Their system is new. It will be used for the first time this 1998 season. They <br /> understood the frustrations of the cumbersome system that we are using and said that they would <br /> have preferred to use a manual system rather than the non-windows version. Shoreview's system <br /> is a comprehensive facility management system that will be used for their extensive leisure pool <br /> program as well as for park athletic fields. <br /> Because Tom and Jerry ( Shoreview staff persons) were unable to answer some of my questions <br /> regarding their new system, they referred me to their <br /> hardware purchasing to accommodate the windows roIIS person who handled all the set-up and <br /> Jim This information was forwarded to <br /> Hess so that the two of them could talk and Tim would able to get a handle on the need for <br /> hardware upgrades to use the windows version efficiently and effectively in our city. <br /> WHAT DID JIM FIND OUT ABOUT HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS? <br /> Tim spoke with Richard (SV MIS Coordinator) and received information regarding hardware <br /> •needs for effectively using the windows scheduling software program. Jim believes that Marv's <br /> current computer will be able to manage the software with an upgrade of additional 16 mg for an <br /> additional cost of 3160. The other two computers including mine and temporary employee would <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.