My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2025/05/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Agenda Packets - 2025/05/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2026 6:09:35 PM
Creation date
5/6/2026 3:27:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/11/2025
Description
Regular Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
464
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Proposed Senior Living Facility—Mounds View, Minnesota <br /> Kilo Project 25-2066—December 30,2025 <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br /> Survey prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. This service has mapped soil <br /> properties for 95% of the United States. At this location, the mapped soils consist of the Urban land- <br /> Lino complex. This stratum consists of approximately 87%to 96%sand-sized particles in the upper soil <br /> profile. These soils are consistent with the materials encountered during this field exploration. These <br /> soils are considered "poor" materials for construction reclamation and "somewhat limited" for <br /> dwellings without basements. It should be noted that the underlying soil sampling for this database <br /> was primarily for agricultural purposes, and only covers the approximate upper eighty inches of the soil <br /> profile. <br /> Soils are not homogenous and may change both vertically and laterally between the boring locations. <br /> Clear separation between strata may not be observed in the field, with gradual transitions between <br /> soil types encountered. The general soil description above is generalized for convenience. Full details <br /> regarding the soils encountered during this exploration are included in the boring logs in the appendix <br /> of this report, including soil descriptions, penetration resistances, moisture contents, and completed <br /> laboratory testing to define soil engineering properties. Water level observations are only valid for the <br /> time and locations sampled and may vary substantially with time. The samples not altered by <br /> laboratory testing will be stored for 30 days from the date of this report then disposed of unless <br /> retention is requested by the client. Storage fees for soils retained beyond 30 days may apply. <br /> CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Foundation Bearing Capacity Testing <br /> Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP)Testing was completed to depths of 30 inches below grades. Then, a <br /> three-inch diameter solid-stem power auger boring was attempted to target depths of 60 inches below <br /> existing site grades to recover soil samples. Auger refusal was encountered in borings B-1, B-2, and B-3 at <br /> 2 feet on buried brick and cobbles. The number of hammer blows required to drive the DCP two inches <br /> into the subgrade were recorded for the full testing depth and are included in the appendix of this report. <br /> DCP testing included correlated bearing capacities of 700 psf to 2,000 psf in each of the borings within the <br /> proposed building and pavement areas. The correlated bearing capacities generally increased with depth. <br /> The top one foot of the subgrade is ignored in reported capacities due to probable disturbance during <br /> construction and frost action during the lifetime of the structure. Each of the tests terminated in suitable <br /> soils. Localized areas of soft or loose material can be remediated using moisture conditioning and <br /> compaction, as described below. <br /> Some of the near-surface soils have been disturbed as part of the findings in the first three borings of <br /> the site, including areas that have been previously graded and near existing site utilities. Existing <br /> utilities that are not planned to be part of the proposed development should be properly sealed and <br /> removed from the site. "Undocumented Fills" are soils that have been previously disturbed by man- <br /> made activities and have an unknown or undocumented history of compaction as part of the previous <br /> site disturbance. These materials can be highly variable in material composition and compaction <br /> quality. Due to this unknown condition, these soils should be either removed and replaced with <br /> engineered fill Undocumented fill soils below foundation elements should be removed and replaced <br /> by engineered fill prior to foundation construction. The materials should be evaluated by a qualified <br /> special inspections firm at the time of construction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.