My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2026/04/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
Agenda Packets - 2026/04/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2026 8:07:03 AM
Creation date
6/24/2026 8:06:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/23/2026
Description
Regular Meeting Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Silver View: there was a very large oak tree that couldn't be kept during the clean up, but a <br />slice has been saved to display. <br />8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />None. <br />9. NEW BUSINESS <br />A. GOAL Parks Recommendations- Peterson: see packet. <br />Karen Grasmon: Silver View Park and Lakeside Lions: We know the recommendations and <br />the master plan have big dollar amounts, but the value and the timing of needs reflect the <br />amount investment. The $15 million bond is a fraction of the grand total needed. <br />Dave Zink, Greenfield Park: we need to continue to invest in the parks! <br />Emily Bacheller: Hodges Park and Woodcrest Park: As a parent we saw the Woodcrest <br />playground go away. The parks are assets. <br />The GOAL parks committee would like to continue to see the project continue. <br />We have a part time marketing intern to help the general public understand what's <br />happening. Considering hiring WSB to also help with marketing. <br />A city -owned cannabis dispensary will be coming, which will be a cost -sharing revenue <br />stream. We don't know what the revenue will be, but it is something for council to consider <br />The Council will be doing a survey which will have questions on whether residents would <br />be in support of a bond. <br />If the City Charter commission were to put forth a 1 % Levy- that would generate about <br />90K/year, which would grow over time to help with on -going maintenance. <br />The city will continue to look for grants and will apply as soon as they have a clear project. <br />The current parks budget does not have a revenue stream coming in. Park dedications <br />funds are not coming in and the deterioration of the parks will continue; maintenance will <br />still need to happen. The parks need a consistent revenue stream to continue to maintain. <br />If the survey comes back that there isn't support for a bond, there may still be a ballot <br />question to help receive the voice of the residents to decide on park funding. <br />Lakeside Lions is a joint park, so that will be a separate conversation on funding <br />Communication with residents will start happening as soon as Council has the go-ahead. <br />Lundberg: suggested to look at corporate sponsorship to help with funding. <br />Councilmember Clark: there is support for communication technician in the strategic plan. <br />Motion: To approve GOALS committee report as written, with the addition of looking <br />at corporate sponsorship for funding and other available sources as they become <br />available, and pass the report on to Council made by Bosneag II, Second by Arel. <br />Motion passes 6-0. <br />B. Rink 2025-2026 usage numbers- Thomas: see packet. We were open 36 days. Lamberts <br />daily use went up from last year (3.7 people/day). Hillview was at 5.5 people/day ( a small <br />drop in last year was 6 people/day). A decision on keeping rinks open would need to be <br />made around September or October to plan on staffing. Some cities are moving to a <br />rotating staff member that checks on the rinks so there is not a staff member that has to be <br />there all the time, which would reduce the 2 staff to 1, but that doesn't change the <br />maintenance for flooding. Lambert is easier to maintain but not as visible. Hillview is harder <br />to maintain, but much more visible. Rink discussions will be revisited prior to winter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.