Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 6949RESOLUTION 6949 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA ACCEPTING THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ELEMENTS FOR THE COUNTY ROAD 10 TRAILWAY CORRIDOR WHEREAS, on August 28, 2006 the City Council approved resolution 6930 authorizing the preliminary design of landscape architecture elements for the County Road 10 Trailway Corridor; and WHEREAS, at the October 2, 2006 Work Session, representatives of the City's consulting firm of BRAA / DSU provided the City Council a presentation on this project and the current landscape concept plan; and WHEREAS, at said Work Session the City Council directed Staff to bring the preliminary design of landscape architecture elements for the County Road 10 Trailway Corridor back to the October 9, 2006 City Council meeting for approval; and WHEREAS, final copies of the report have been completed and are available for review at City Hall and will be available on the City's web site at http://www.ci.mounds-view.mn.us; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this preliminary landscape design is to ensure that the landscaping designs throughout the County Road 10 Trailway Corridor will flow along the corridor and transitions between future projects will be seamless. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THAT the Mounds View City Council does hereby accept the preliminary design of landscape architecture elements for the County Road 10 Trailway Corridor. Adopted this 9th day of October 2006. ~~ Rob Marty, Mayor ATTES-f: ~^) ~~ ~ ~~ Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator (seal) Mounds View City Council October 9, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 13 t C. Resolution 6948 Approving the County Road 10 Pedestrian Crossing Options 2 Report 3 n n ~ ~ Sono A. *~h«oi: n ~f 1 .+ ~icCiJV-ra i~ esig:i vz r~i.i.uua,uYe 4 A.-~L.:~o~~.. o ~I~ .,~~ f...- •L.~ !`~ .,+. 0~,.,.1 1!1 T.-n:l~ar ~'' r:~l uj' a~vr .uvi 5 6 MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To Approve the Consent Agenda as amended. 7 8 Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 9 to D. Resolution 6949 Approving the Preliminary Design of Landscape 11 Architecture Elements for the County Road 10 Trailway Corridor 12 13 Councilmember Stigney stated his concern is that the Resolution does not specify the funding 14 source or cost. 15 16 Director Lee explained that within the capital improvement program that passed in August, the 17 trailway plans were approved and adopted. He shared the plan with the Council. 18 19 Councilmember Stigney stated his concern is that there are many areas in the plan that should be 20 considered further, rather than be voted upon in the Consent Agenda. He suggested the 21 Resolution be brought back for further discussion. 22 23 Councilmember Thomas explained that the Resolution does not approve spending money, and 24 that the plans will come back to the Council before any money is spent. She explained that the 25 Resolution approves various elements that will be included in the plan, not authorizing such 26 elements to be constructed. 27 28 Mayor Marty said his and Councilmember Stigney's concern is that such projects do not go 29 forward without Council approval. 30 31 Director Lee pointed out for each segment, the feasibility report will come back to the Council. 32 In addition, the plans and specs would come back and the project would have to be ordered and 33 approved by the Council. 34 35 Councilmember Thomas stated the current Resolution is before the Council because it saves 36 money by approving all of the proposed elements that could potentially be used in the design. 37 38 Co~ulcilmember Gunn agreed with Councilmember Thomas that the Council is approving the 39 preliminary design. She suggested that the elements the City has so far be brought together for a 40 more comprehensive look at the trailway corridor. She said it is a big project and before the City 41 loses sight of the project, a discussion should be held. 42 43 Councilmember Stigney stated that each segment is made up of many individual elements and his 44 concern is approving all elements. He said he would like to look at each element before they are 45 installed and that his problem is with the vague language of the Resolution. Mounds View City Council October 9, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 14 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 l0 11 12 13 14 1S 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 3S 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 4S Councilmember Thomas stated that the Council would determine funding and specific elements in the plans and specs, not in the current phase. Director Lee suggested that the language be changed to "accept" rather than "approve." Cowlcihnember Stigney stated he would accept the preliminary plan as long as there are approval and discussion of all the elements that go into each segment. Councilmember Flaherty stated he would accept the language change from "approve" to "accept." MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/THOMAS. To adopt Resolution 6949 Accepting the Preliminary Design of Landscape Architecture Elements for the County Road 10 Trailway Corridor, as amended. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 9. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS Councilmember Gunn suggested the Council note their questions and discuss them with Finance Director Beer at a later date. MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/MARTY. To approve the Just and Correct Claims as Presented. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. September 11, 2006 City Council Meeting Minutes Mayor Marty noted he and Councilmember Gunn called in their changes to City Administrator Ulrich. MOTION/SECOND: MARTY/GUNN. To Approve the September, 2006 City Council meeting minutes as corrected. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 11. REPORTS A. Reports of Mayor and Council Mayor Marty pointed out that since the last Council meeting, there was a meeting at City Hall about the stoplight at Silver Lake Road and County Road H. He stated Jan Weisner, Ken Heider,