HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 1961/09/06l
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING
WATERWORKS IMPROVEMENT NO. 1960 -3
VILLAGE OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That the Village Council of the Village
of Mounds View, Minnesota, will meet at the Village Offices in said Vii
lage on Wednesday, September 6, 1961, at 8:00 o'clock P.M., for the pur-
pose of conducting a public hearing on the assessments proposed to be
made against property benefited by Waterworks Improvement No. 1960-3.
Said improvement consists of the following work:
Construction of lateral water mains, service lines, valves, hydrants and
appurtenances thereto in the following areas:
(SE AL)
In. the streets and public roads lying west of the east property
line of Fairchild Avenue and south of U. S. Highway No. 10;
In the streets and public roads lying west of Edgewood Road and
east of Groveland Street between Sherwood and County Road I;
On Long Lake Road from Sherwood to a point 125' north of Arden.
The area proposed to be assessed for special benefit derived from said
improvement is each lot, piece and parcel of property abutting upon the
above streets within the Village of Mounds View.
All persons whose property might be so assessed may, at the above- stated
time and place, present oral or written objections to said assessments.
Dated: August 14, 1961
BY ORDER OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL
i
/s/ L. Jerome Blanchard
Village Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was
duly seconded by member Malvin; and upon a vote being taken, the fol-
lowing members voted in favor thereof: Crane, Blanchard, Christensen,
Hodges and Malvin
and the following voted against the same: none
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ss.
VILLAGE OF MOUNDS VIEW)
I, the undersigned, the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the
Village of Mounds View, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY That I have care-
fully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a meeting
of the Village Council of the Village of Mounds View held on the date
therein indicated with the original of said minutes on file in my office
and that said extract is a full, true and correct transcript of said
minutes insofar as said minutes relate to approving the assessments for
Waterworks Improvement No. 1960 -3 and calling a hearing thereon.
WITNESS My hand officially and the official seal of the Village
this to day of
(SEAL)
66 19 (p 1
-3-
VILLAGE CLERK
PROCEEDINGS OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL
VILLAGE OF MCi;NDS VIEW
RAMSEY C')UNTY
MINNESOTA
0d013.1
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof,a Special Meeting ,f the
Village Council was called to order Se.ptembef 6th,'1961, at'8 OO P.M.
at the Village office, 5499 Adams by acting Mayor Hodges.
Present ,are: Acting Mayor: Donald Hodges
Clerk: Lloyd J. Blanchard
Adm. Clk: Paul Boog
Trustees: Melford Christensen
Motion by Blanchard to recess the meeting and to reconvene at the
Red Oak School, Sherwood Rd. and Red Oak Dr., because of lack of space.
Seconded by Christensen. 3 Ayes.
At. Red Oak School the Village Attorney, Fiscal Agent, and Engineer
assissted various citizens in determining the amount of their assessment,.
The meeting was again called to order at 8:25 P.M. by acting Mayor
Hodges.
Present were: Acting Mayor: Donald Hodges
Clerk: Lloyd J. Blanchard
Trustees: Mulford Christensen
Perry Malvin
Engineer: Les Knutson
Attorney: Richard Meyers
Fiscal Agent: Mann
The Mayor explained that this hearing was for the purpose of deter-
mining and setting the individual assessment for the homes on the 196C =3
project. He then turned the floor over to Mr. Knutson. Village Engineer.
Mr. Knutson then explained that this project was initiatsd in 19
by the Village Council in answer to petitions received and a hearing
was held to determine where the water lines would go. The contract was
awarded to Herbst Const, after due legal advertisement and the project
was completed this spring. The total cost of the job including all costs
such as engineer, legal fiscal, clerical, etc. amounted to $215,164.18.
The cost was then apportioned along those lots receiving benefits solely
on their front foot basis. This was done by dividing the total cost by
the front footage served. The front footage assessment then became $4.00
per lineal foot. In addition to this a number of connections were made.
The total cost of these services resulted in a cost per service of
$106.50 and that is the basis for this hearing, to apprise you of what
these amounts are and how they were determined.
Mr. Knutson cited as an example the difference in the cost of water
between Nounds View and Blaine. Blaine water cost on a 75ft, lot is
482 while Mounds View lut on same size is $428.50 including the
service connection, 46,389.45 lineal ft., 286 services, and 278 assessable
services.
This concluded Mr. Knutson's explanati)n and the Mayor then asked
if there were any 7uesti regarding what had been stated.
Respectfully submitted by
Lloyd J. Blanchard
Village Clerk
000132
Sept. 6, 1961 Special i':eeting (cont)
A resident asked the reason for the $106.50 hook -up and it was
again explained that the total number of hookups or services were
divided into the total cost and this amount then became the service
connection charge,
The Mayor then called on Mr: Z; Mann to explain the financing of
this project, Mr. Mann stated that on the following Monday at the
regular Council neeting the Council would consider the objections
rendered at this hearing and then act to either adopt the assessment
role as presented or corrected. He further stated that those assessed
would have thirty (30) days from that time to pay their assessment with
out interest. After thirty(30) days this role would go to the County
and be spread on the taxes, rollowing this thirty(30) day period
interest would be added at the rate )f 6% per year over a fifteen (15)
year period on a declining balanceā He then cited examples of ho+: an
assessment could be paid off,
The Clerk stated that there would be no individual notice of
assessment amounts sent out but that this information could be readily
obtained at the Village office,
The acting Mayor then called for objections to the assessment.
#1. Mr. Jesse Varnes of 7350 Fairchild Ave, objected to the
amount of the assessment as a large portion of one of his lots was not
usable because of a swampy area in back of one cf his lots. He feels
that this assessment will cause a hardship on him and that he will not
benefit in proportion to his assessment.
The Attorney stated that the Council would make a determination of
benefits and then decide whether cf not a correction should be made,
and on that basis either adopt or correct the assessment role.
#2. Mr, Gerald Blanski, 1881 Woodale Drive, objected to the
assessment because his lot has a 256 ft, frontage while it is only 100ft,
deep, therby making his frontage assessment $1,024. He stated that in
his opinion the assessment is too hgh for the amount of benefits
received,
#3, Mr, Alvin Hillsdale, 7850 Spring Lake Park Rd., objected to
the assessment on the grounds that he does not have the front footage
stated in the assessment book. Rather than the 563 ft, stated, he has
appro 265 ft. and therefore should have a lower front footage
assessment.
There being no further objections Mr. Hodges adjouned the meeting
at 9 :15 P.M.
After the meeting, an open question and answer period was held.
Questions regarding the cost of previous projects, other Villages
procedures, hook -up fees, future piejects, Council policy regarding
installation cf water, etc.
These were discussed at some length by those present.
The question and answer period ended at 9:45 p,,v,