HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 1976/02/09A regular meeting of the Mounds View City Council
to order by Mayor Johnson on February 9, 1976, at
at Mounds View City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds
Present:
There were no Citizens' Comments.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Mayor Johnson Also
Councilman Hodges
Councilman Baumgartner
Councilman Pickar
Councilman Shelquist
MSP (Baumgartner Shelquist) to.approve the
1976.
MSP (Shelquist- Baumgartner) to approve the
meeting of the Mounds View City Council on
Councilman Pickar stated that he abstained
he was not present at the meeting.
present:
was called
8:04 pm,
View, MN. 55112
Clerk- Adm.Achen
Attorney Meyers
Engineer Bearden
minutes of the special
February 2, 1976.
from voting as
minutes of January 26,
5 ayes
Regarding the next item on the agenda, proposed ordinances revising
license fees for intoxicating liquor, cabaret and restaurant
establishments, Mayor Johnson stated that he had received a
memorandum prepared by the administrator relating the facts and
figures for the above. He asked for questions of the administrator
on his report.
John G. Bell, Attorney for Anchor Inn, Donatelle's, Launching Pad
and Mermaid Liquor Establishments, stated that if the restaurant
license is to cover the cost of services he felt tae liquor license
fee would be quite adequate. Mayor Johnson explained that there
are more costs to the restaurants fhm, are serving liquor as
against serving food only. Mr. Bell replied that he did not think
that one was compounding the cost of the other. Mayor Johnson
asked Mr. Bell if he was suggesting that there is no added cost
to the city in terms of a restaurant that has liquor as well as
food as opposed to an establishment just serving food? Mr. Bell
replied that he had seen no showing that there is any difference.
Administrator Achen stated that the basic complaints in restaurants
only serving food concern storage of meats, sewer backups, etc.
This is defined as a public health license. The liquor licence
deals with law enforcement from a criminal point of view rather
than a public health law.
Councilman Pickar asked Mr. Bell if he had done any further research
on other municipalities and Mr. Bell said that he presumed the
figures were the same.
4 ayes
1 abst.
-2-
Mr. Bell further stated that he still stands by the position
that the license fees we have now are adequate. Mayor Johnson
inquired as to the approximate costs for police protection,
administration and court services. Administrator Achen stated
that in 1975 it was $20,493 for police and court services, based
on 3 months statistics and multiplying by 4. The estimate for
1976 is $22,000, 7% of the police budget and 22% of the prosecuting
budget.
Ad. Achen read proposed ordinance #242 for restaurants, amending
the municipal code. Attorney Meyers suggested amending the title
and including the words "It may be revoked by the Council after
a public hearing, after due notice." Further, include the words
in Sec. 111.04 "1973 edition or the most recent edition.
MSP (Shelquist Pickar) to adopt Ordinance #242 for liquor licenses
for restaurants. 5 ayes
Attorney Meyers read proposed ordinance #243, amending Chp. 100,
"Intoxicating Liquors."
Mr. Bell stated that the dance hall ordinance has a limit of $200,
and he couldn't understand why the dance hall with liquor would
be so much higher. Mayor Johnson replied that the dance halls
are required to have police help by state law and there is no such
requirement for the on sale liquor establishments.
Councilman Shelquist suggested in Sec. 2, Subd. 1, inserting
"That the application will also show whether the applicant has been
or is operating a similar business at some other location, and
if so, where it was, when and for what length of time, and such
other information."
Mr. Bell asked what was meant by 'public areas' in subd. 4? Does it
means just the area where they eat or anywhere? Attorney Meyers
suggested adding to the ordinance the words "sale, service, or
consumption of the food and liquor."
MSP (Shelquist- Hodges) to adopt Ordinance #243, amending Chp. 100,
"Intoxicating Liquors." 4 ayes
1 nay
Councilman Pickar, who voted nay, stated that he has a
difficult time justifying the percentage of increase. Perhaps
we should have taken a closer look at some of Mr. Bell's comments.
I cannot go along with it, and suggest a base fee reduced by
approximately 25%.
Councilman Shelquist stated that last week he had stated that he
was not in favor of a ceiling of $10,000. After thinking about
it it is good for the business to know where the top can reach and
he will go along with it, recognizing that the ordinance can be
changed. As far as the ordinance is concerned, the starting point
is what is everyone else doing? Our administrator has researched
the costs very thoroughly and the law is a good one.
Mayor Johnson stated that he is in favor of the new ordinance
and commends Ad. Achen for the work he has been doing with it.
-3-
Administrator Achen stated that Chp. 108 deals directly with
public dance halls as cabarets are now under Chp. 100.
MSP (Hodges Pickar) to adopt Ordinance #244 amending the Municipal
Code of Mounds View to insert "cabarets" under Chp. 100. 5 ayes
Ad. Achen explained the resolution endorsing the proposed
Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau.
MSP (Johnson Baumgartner) to adopt Resolution 713 endorsing
the proposed Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau. 5 ayes
Councilman Shelquist explained the Planning Commission recommendation
on the special use permit request to erect an indoor tennis
court facility. It is to be located behind the PAC Company.
Previously the Planning Commission had turned the request down
due to this requirement for a 40 foot setback on both sides. They
then reoriented their interior, made modifications, etc. and now
the Planning Commission recommends a special use permit with a variance
on the sideyard setback to within the requirements of the new
ordinance. They felt that this was justified as the new ordinance
is about to be adopted.
Councilman Baumgartner: I don't like the location of the trailer
but if on the east side it would be noisy. I also feel there is no
resale value on trailers and you may have trouble selling it when
the program is over. Your program is good and we will have to live
with it. I will go with it.
MSP (Johnson Shelquist) for a public hearing to be held on March 8
at 8:30 pm to hear the special use permit request to erect an indoor
tennis court facility. 5 ayes
George Richardson, Principal of Red Oak School, appeared before
the Council to request a mobile home special permit. They have
received a grant designed to help parents with parenting skills
through meetings and they lack space. They had planned to lease
a trailer but the School Board attorney considered this uneconomical:
so now they plan to purchase it. What he is asking for is the
approval to place a trailer on the Red Oak School site to be
used for meetings described on the 1st page of the document he
passed out to the Council members. The program is funded through
this fiscal year and tentatively through 1976 and 1977.
Councilman Pickar asked him if he had made any attempt to recontact
the neighbors and ne replied, "No, not this time." Councilman
Baumgartner inquired as to costs and Mr. Richardson stated that a
portable classroom was over $14,000, and the trailer is somewhat
under $5,000.
Councilman Shelquist asked him why they were placing it on the Red
Oak side.
Mr. Richardson replied because it would be away from the playground
and adjacent to the kindergarten room. They also have a problem
of landslope. He has talked personally with 8 churches in the
area and they are thoroughly booked.
Mayor Johnson polled the Council:
-4-
Councilman Pickar: I can see no big reasons why not. Probably
would have preferred a consensus of the neighborhood but I realize
you are pressed for time and recall from before there was no
objection. I am for the plan and this would have delayed it so I am
in favor of the mobile home.
Councilman Shelquist: We are in essence telling the Planning
Commission what to do. I would rather have their input since they
will be granting the variance. The Planning Commission normally
recommends to us. Once someone else sees this they may want the
same thing.
Mr. Richardson stated that the placement of a mobile home on school
grounds is approved according to the State Bldg. Code Department.
Attorney Meyers stated that in Chp. 43 it states temporary special
permits may be issued by the Council when said home is outside of
the mobile home park. However, it can be issued for only 90 days
and must be renewed each time.
Councilman Hodges: I dread seeing a mobile home on it. But as it is
temporary and if the Planning Commission goes along with it I will
go along with it.
Mayor Johnson asked how many schools in our district have temporary
facilities like this? Mr. Richardson replied that no other has a
mobile home, but Edgewood Jr. High School has a temporary structure.
Mayor Johnson: Regardless of what the Planning Commission would say,
my feeling would be against it. I think the Council has to be
consistent. I understand your position, and it is unfortunate, but
I don't want to have Mounds View used as a test spot for a mobile home.
He further suggested to Mr. Richardson that he consider using the
facilities here at the city hall in Mounds View.
ENGINEER BEARDEN'S REPORT: On November 8, 1975, regarding Improvement
Project 1973 -75, you approved the amendment to #4 for an extension
of time and I need your signatures now. That is all I have at th e
present. Mr. Bearden then left., after obtaining the necessary signa-
tures.
Ad. Achen discussed the proposed Community Development Block Grant
application, explaining that the handout is the substance of the narra-
tive for the City's Community Development Block Grant application.
It would be appropriate for the Council, if they so desire, to
formally accept this narrative. Under II, #2, there is a typographical
error, the number "11,000" should read "$41,000
MSP (Johnson- Hodges) to accept the program narrative for the
Community Development Block Grant application. 5 ayes
MSP (Johnson- Hodges) to approve the transfer of $9022 from water
fund and $9021 from sewer fund to 1969 water revenue bond redemption
fund. 5 ayes
MSP (Pickar- Hodges) to approve the applications for licenses
as presented. 5 ayes
They are: Builders Remodeler's Inc.
2630 Hennepin Ave. So.
Minneapolis, MN. 55408
D.W. Construction, Inc.
8804 Lexington Ave,
New Brighton, MN. 55112
-5-
Ronald Evenson Construction
11019 6th St. N.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55434
Administrator Achen presented the bills for approval with one
stipulation, which is if Local 49 goes on strike, new payroll
checks shall be issued taking into account the days not worked.
In the February 1976 payables are General Account Checks
#11881 11972, Payroll Account Checks #1236 -1240, Payroll
Checks #3309 -3354 (void #3350), Transfer Check #11970
transferring $15,419.24 from General Fund, $1,015.58 from
Water, $1,620.26 from Sewer to pay gross pay of February 15,
1976. Total February disbursements $47,173.94.
MSP (Johnson- Hodges) to approve the bills as listed with the
stipulation as requested by Administrator Achen. 5 ayes
Adm.Achen stated that the office has received a letter from
Mr. Bruflodt requesting that the city pay the attorney's fees
of $150 and recording costs regarding the improper recording
of his subdivision which was originally approved in February,
1975. He noted the error was partly the city's fault and
recommended that it should be paid.
Councilman Shelquist stated that the attorney should have known
what he was preparing when he made the original deeds and he
was not sure we should stand the entire fee.
MSP (Johnson Pickar) that we direct the administrator to
prepare a check and accept the responsibility for the attorney's
costs up to a maximum of $150 for the Bruflodt subdivision,
and that the city also pay the filing fee.
Administrator Achen further stated that on February 18 at
7:30 p.m. the Ramsey County League of Municipalities is
having its meetin4 in the city hall in Mounds View and they
would like Mayor Johnson to make the opening remarks. He
presented the Civil Defense budget for signature by the Mayor
for the fiscal year 1977.
5 ayes
MSP (Baumgartner- Hodges) to authorize the Mayor to sign the
1977 Civil Defense budget per request. 5 ayes
Mayor Johnson thanked the Council wives for putting on the
Appreciation Banquet last Saturday evening_ He stated that
Council should consider a new ordinance that would require
all commercial development in the city be developed on the
basis of a development contract covering the requirements
that the city may put on that particular developer.
-6-
MSP (Johnson Shelquist) to direct Attorney Meyers to explore
and develop a development contract procedure covering
development and construction in our city.
MSP (Johnson Baumgartner) that no further building permits
be issued for developments that Council has authorized as
of January 31, 1976, that such developments be reviewed
to assure protection of city interests and welfare, and that
each development be required to comply with the conditions to
be set forth in the development contracts procedures that
Council has directed the attorney to prepare.
COUNCILMAN HODGES' reported that he had received a telephone
call stating that National Clean Up Day is scheduled for
April 30. He recommended the city hold its clean up the
same day. Further, as soon as the weather permits the fireplace
will be built and they would like to work around that date.
COUNCILMAN BAUMGARTNER had no report.
COUNCILMAN PICKAR'S REPORT: Regarding the Lakeside Park Club
skating races on Sunday, February 1 participation was 28
people and they awarded 22 trophies. They have accepted the
resignation of Judy Rowley from the Lakeside Park Association.
Two new members will be there on Thursday evening.
COUNCILMAN SHELQUIST'S REPORT: He inquired about the interview
for the Planning Commission vacancy.
Mayor Johnson scheduled it for 8:15 p.m. on Thursday evening,
February 12. Councilman Shelquist asked Administrator Achen
if he had looked intc the dog situation yet and he replied "No
ATTORNEY MEYERS' REPORT: April 5 is the trial date set on the
Laxman Sundae case. He has talked to NSP about getting a gas line
north of Ardan Avenue and they are not going to do it willingly.
They will require deposit payments. The Public Service
Commission does not allow them to vary. Further, he stated
that he had received a deed regarding the Dumas property
(appealing our Project 1973 -4 assessment). The city may have
another lot to sell, otherwise the court appeal will be tried
March 18.
MSP (Shelquist- Baumgartner) to adjourn at 11:12 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark Achen
Clerk- Administrator
5 ayes
5 ayes