HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 1976/07/26PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A regular meeting of the Mounds View City Council was called
to order by Acting Mayor Hodges on July 26, 1976, at 8:00 p.m.
at Mounds View City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112.
Present: Acting Mayor Hodges
Councilman Baumgartner
Councilman Pickar
Councilman Shelquist
Also present: Clerk Admin. Achen
Attorney Meyers
Engineer Hubbard
MSP (Baumgartner Shelquist) to approve the minutes of
July 12, 1976, regular meeting.
CITIZEN COMMENTS REQUESTS: Bonnie Carlson, 2646 Clearview
Ave., president of the Mounds View League of Women Voters,
requested that the City pay the cost of a publication /news-
letter informing citizens of the various upcoming election
issues and candidates. Right now the Mounds View citizens
must rely on the New Brighton Bulletin and individual flyers
for this information. The League would prepare a questionnaire
for the candidates to complete and then assemble and prepare
the information for publication and assist in the mailing.
The bill for printing and mailing would be about $575.00.
Atty. Meyers stated that this expenditure would be for a valid
public purpose, although he hadn't actually researched it.
Bonnie Carlson had contacted the State League officials
and they thought the publication was a good way to inform
citizens. The publication would be strictly for informational
purposes and would be totally unbiased.
Councilman Pickar asked if the questionnaire would be screened
for accuracy? Ms. Carlson stated the League would review
the individual questionnaires and limit the length of the
answers and review for grammatical accuracy, but the published
statements will be what the candidates answer.
Acting Mayor Hodges advised putting this item on the agenda
for the August 2 Council agenda session.
Acting Mayor Hodges asked the Administrator how many persons
had applied for the Council vacancy? Admin. Achen listed the
following five applicants: L. "Jerry" Blanchard, 8005
Groveland Rd.; Bruce Madsen, 5463 Adams St.; LuVerne E.
Peterson, 2427 Clearview Ave.; John Pickar, 2299 Knoll Dr.;
and Judy Rowley, 2562 Ridge Lane. The Admin. was instructed
to sot up interviews with the candidates for Thursday,
July 29, 1976,beginning at 7:00 p.m.
4 ayes
July 26, 1976 Page 2
CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Baumgartner requested that Item "K"
involving the Lion Club's request for reimbursement of $45 be
removed from the consent agenda. He stated his objection to
the work being done first and the bill presented to the City
later.
MSP (Shelquist- Hodges) to approve the following Consent Agenda
items with Item "K" removed:
ITEM A. Approve assignment of $250,000.00 Federal Home Loan
Banks due 8 -25 -76 and $200,000.00 Federal Home Loan Banks due
8 -25 -76 in lieu of a bond by the First State Bank of New
Brighton acting as the City of Mounds View public depository.
These securities replace the existing securities which total
only $300,000.00. The increase 1n this deposit is required,
because we have been keeping more city funds in the Bank under
our savings account there.
ITEM B. Adopt Resolution Nos. 744 -746 reapportioning assessments
for the following subdivisions respectively: Arlue Smith
8461 Groveland Rd.; Arthur J. Spagenski, Spagenski's Addition;
and Marvin Schluter L.Brogger Pleasant View Estates.
ITEM C. Set public hearing on Lida and Hummel's 1st Addition
preliminary plat for 8:10 p.m. Monday, August 9, 1976.
ITEM D. Set public hearing on a mendment of custafson's 1st
Addition recorded plat for 8:20 p.m. Monday, August 9, 1976.
ITEM E. Approve July 26, 1976, bills.
ITEM F. Approve the following licenses:
General Contractors NEW
Tkaczik, Richard Construction Inc.
12315 Gladiola
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
Duevel, Hank Construction
9307 5th St. N.E.
Blaine, MN 55434
General Contractors RENEWAL
Robertson, J.C. Construction, Inc.
1844 134th Ave. N.E.
Anoka, MN 55303
Sewer Water NEW
Marty Bros.
9436 Quaker Lane
Osseo, MN 55369
Hank's Excavating
601 Pearson Parkway
Brooklyn Park, MN 55444
Asphalt Paving RENEWAL
Fairfax Asphalt Inc.
6699 Ashton Ave. N.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55432
Miles Garages
4500 Lyndale Ave. N.
Minneapolis, MN 55412
Aladdin Pools, Inc.
4738 42nd Ave. N.
Minneapolis, MN 55422
D. W. Construction, Inc.
8804 Lexington Ave.
New Brighton, MN 55112
Htg. Air Cond. RENEWAL
St. Marie Sheet Metal Inc.
7940 Spring Lake Rd.
Minneapolis, MN 55432
Northeast Sheet Metal
4347 Central Ave. N.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55421
4 ayes
July 26, 1976 Page 3
ITEM G. Appoint Lauren K. Maker Housing Inspection Aid effective
July 27, 1976, at $3.50 per hour to be funded by Community
Development Block Grant funds.
ITEM H. Appoint Kathy Harvey Clerk- Typist effective August 9,
1976, at $3.15 per hour to be funded 75% by Community Develop-
ment Block Grant funds and 25% by the General Fund through
December 31, 1976.
ITEM I. Adopt Resolution No. 747 of agreement to participate in
the Minnesota Highway Safety Program project for correcting
regulatory and warning sign deficiencies. This agreement
entitles the city to 90% state funding of the corrective work.
The public works director has estimated this work to cost
$8,918 (including $1,400 of maintenance staff time). The
city's share will be 10 However, because our staff time is
eligible for reimbursement, there will be no cost to the city
other than the diversion of staff time.
ITEM J. Receive financial statements of 1975 city finances
prepared by the independent audit firm of George M. Hansen Co.
ITEM L. Approve, as recommended by the Planning Commission
(7/14/76 minutes), minor subdivision request of Velda Fogard
to create two lots from the existing property located at 8311
Spring Lake Rd. West lot will be 218.10 feet deep and east
lot 210.10 feet deep. Five foot utility easements will be
provided on the back lot line of each lot.
ITEM M. Authorize execution of an amended agreement with the
First National Bank of St. Paul relating to their service as
the paying agent for the city's 1976 $1,045,000 Refunding Bonds.
The original agreement mistakenly included requirement that the
city remit paying agent fees on these Refunding Bonds. The
amended agreement stipulates that these fees have been paid
in full as part of the refunding agreement with Ehlers Associates.
Acting Mayor Hodges then called to order the public hearing
on Dalberg's Sunnyside Estates preliminary plat. Admin. Achen
stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
plat with the stipulation that the existing concrete slab be
removed from Lot 3. This hearing had been postponed from an
earlier date because of problems submitting this formal prelimi-
nary plat. Mike White, representative of the Dalberg's and
Halgren's, stated the slab would be removed prior to approval
of the final plat.
MSP (Baumgartner- Pickar) to close the public hearing.
MS (Shelquist- Baumgartner) to approve the preliminary plat of
Dalberg's Sunnyside Estates as recommended by the Planning
Commission and subject to the condition that the existing
concrete slab be removed prior to the final plat being approved.
MSP (Shelquist- Baumgartner) to amend the motion to indicate the
plat as being dated June 14, 1976. 4 ayes
Vote on the main motion as amended. 4 ayes
July 26, 1976 Page 4
Referring back to the Lion's request for a $45 reimbursement
for the cost of a chipper to haul away diseased trees, Council-
man Baumgartner stated that refunding this money would be
setting a bad precedent. He commended the Lion's for their
actions in removing the 5 trees of the senior citizen and
the 4 trees on the boulevard; but the point remains that the
expense was incurred without prior Council approval and now
they present the bill for payment. Councilman Pickar agreed
that Councilman Baumgartner had a good point about expending
public funds without approval. Councilman Shelquist stated that
the Lion's had, in fact, saved the City about $150. Jack Shields,
City tree inspector, had estimated removal of the four trees on
the boulevard at $200; the Lions did the work and are only
charging us $45 for the cost of the chipper.
Atty. Meyers said if Council can determine that this expenditure
is for a valid public purpose, namely removal of four trees on
the boulevard, it is a legal expenditure. Make it clear in the
motion that you are not setting a precedent. Council must
determine if this is a valid public expenditure.
Councilman Pickar suggested that the Lions present a bill to
the City stating what the $45 is for.
MSP (Pickar- Shelquist) to authorize expenditure of $45.00
for reimbursement to the Mounds View Lions Club for removal
of four city trees at 7890 Greenwood Drive with the stipulation
that the Lions submit a statement or bill showing that the fee
is for the removal of the four trees on city property.
Roll call vote:
Councilman Pickar aye
Councilman Shelquist aye
Councilman Baumgartner nay
Acting Mayor Hodges aye
Motion carried.
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1975 -4A. Eng. Hubbard stated the City
had received three bids for the Mounds View Square Shopping
Center drainage. Low bidder was Central Landscaping, Inc. for
the amount of $11,654.50, compared to the engineer's estimate
of $13,200. He recommended awarding the bid to Central Landscaping.
Admin. Achen asked for a recommendation on the type of pipe to
be used in the project. Eng. Hubbard stated corrugated pipe
would be adequate, but for bid purposes, it made no difference
as the price would be the same for either corrugated or
reinforced concrete piping. Councilman Baumgartner asked what
portion this project covers? Eng. Hubbard stated piping will run
from Long Lake Rd. to the first entrance of the shopping center.
Councilman Shelquist asked the Eng. if he had any knowledge of
Central Landscaping? Eng. Hubbard replied that Comstock Davis
had checked them out and recommended the firm. Central Land-
scaping is a landscaping firm, the Engineer didn't know who the
subcontractor would be.
July 26, 1976
Page 5
Councilman Baumgartner questioned the starting date for the
project. Eng. Hubbard indicated the contractor would be given
10 days to execute an agreement and after that 30 days to
complete the project. Eng. Hubbard also stated that this
project will be assessed against the property owner. Atty.
Meyers stated it will be assessed under Chapter 429 subject to
the rights of appeal and contest.
MS (Hodges Shelquist) to accept the lowest bid of Central
Landscaping, Inc. in the amount of $11,654.50.
Councilman Pickar suggested adding the type of pipe to be used.
Councilman Shelquist stated the State's recommendation had
been reinforced concrete.
MSP (Shelquist- Hodges) to amend the motion to stipulate that
reinforced concrete piping be used. 3 ayes
1 nay
Councilman Baumgartner asked the engineer what his recommenda-
tion is on the type of pipe. Eng. Hubbard stated he understood
the theory behind bidding was the concern that the sand be kept
from building up. No matter which pipe you put in, you are
going to have the problem. There is no difference in price for
either pipe.
Councilman Shelquist stated the concrete is a more permanent
structure. This is the City's opportunity to provide something
more permanent and it isn't going to cost us one cent to do it.
Vote on the main motion as amended. 4 ayes
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1976 -1. Eng. Hubbard stated two bids were
received for the sealcoating project. Low bid was Allied Black-
top for $43,915.20. Bituminous Roadways submitted a bid for
$48,021.30. Engineer's estimate was $39,625. 1976 estimated
budgeted amount was $29,500. Based on this, Eng. Hubbard
recommended rejecting all bids and combine this year's and next
year's program. In the meantime, City forces can do some of
the repair work and some may be done on force account. Combining
the two years' program would make it possible to put out bids
earlier in the year, thus picking up more and possibly better
bids with the pricing being on more units. Administrator
Achen reinforced the Engineer's recommendation and explained
that Eng. Hubbard having been recently hired by the City was
not involved in the original planning of this bid.
Admin. Achen also stated that we should develop a sealcoating
program that is practical. City adopted this program on assump-
tion of $30- 35,000, now we are talking about $40,000 in second
year of project. The program should be reevaluated to determine
if it wouldn't be better to stretch the work over seven years
and make it more financially sound. Even at the $30,000 level,
City is operating $10,000 in the hole. Admin. Achen again
recommended rejecting all bids until next year, giving our new
Engineer time to reevaluate the sealcoating program and try to
reduce costs.
July 26, 1976 Page 6
Councilman Pickar questioned whether rejecting all bids would
have an adverse impact on the City? Admin. Achen stated that
risk is always there and the bidder's impression of our reason
for rejecting bids. Eng. Hubbard indicated the low bidder
is aware that this is over the budget for this year, so he
thought the bidder would understand our rejecting the bid.
Admin. Achen stated letters will be going out to bidders explain-
ing the rejection.
Eng. Hubbard explained the cost of the repair work was what was
out of line. Had the bid strictly been for sealcoating, the
bid would have been lower. Councilman Baumgartner questioned
whether the maintenance supervisor would be able to provide the
manpower for the repair work and not let other responsibilities
fall back? Admin. Achen stated the maintenance supervisor was
brought in on the staff's discussion of inhouse repair work and
is aware of this additional work.
Councilman Baumgartner wondered if it is wise to patch and not
sealcoat right away? Eng. Hubbard stated new surfacing can
wait up to five years before sealcoating.
MSP Pickar- Baumgartner) that under the advice of the City
Engineer that all bids be rejected and bidders involved shall
be n ^FifiPA of reasons thereof, as discussed here tonight. 4 ayes
Admin. Achen stated that the Rosenquist Addition preliminary plat
was on the last Council agenda and Council requested that the
plat be redrawn to include the Bonin property to the southwest
and negotiate an agreement for handling assessments for Project
1973 -4 on Outlot B.
Atty. Meyers stated he had researched this item. Outlot B is
80' frontage with 60 -70' depth, which is an unbuildable lot.
This parcel would carry close to $4,000 of assessments. The
danger facing Council now is that by approving the plat with no
agreement with the property owners concerning the assessments,
Outlot B may go back to taxes and assessments will not be paid.
Atty. Meyers listed alternatives for handling this situation.
First, the Senior Citizen Deferment the drawback to doing
this is the City would have to establish standards and guidelines
for determining hardship which would be applicable to all types
of property in the City. Second, Chapter 429.071 allows that
when land is divided, Council may on its own motion apportion
assessments. Council could remove all assessments from Outlot B
and reapportion them to all existing buildable lots. However,
this is subject to appeal. Another alternative is a private
agreement for deferring assessments over so many years, an
agreement to be filed with the land. If the ownersdon't work
out agreement with adjacent land owners for creating a buildable
lot, after the 2 yr. or whatever period of time, the land still
goes back to taxes. Or the Council may choose to not approve
the plat until the owners work out an agreement with adjacent
property owners. The City has pledged proceeds from these assess-
ments to pay off the bond.
July 26, 1976 Page 7
Ken Sjodin, representing the Rosenquists, stated that the
first approach is definitely out, the second would not be
fair to present owners because they'd be penalized for owning
land. He requested the third approach of deferment and also
suspending the interest. Mr. Sjodin added that the problem
for the owners was created by the City putting in the new
street.
Atty. Meyers said Council could approve the plat and owners
would stop paying taxes on Outlot B. Or, Council can work out
deferment agreement which can be filed with the property which,
again, may not get paid. Interest could be deferred, also.
Ken Sjodin stated that it is unfair to charge interest on
property that is unusable and was made unusable by the City.
Robert Glazer, 2625 Hillview Rd., asked the courts decision on
improvements where the owner is not benefitted. Atty. Meyers
replied that this is a valid assessment, appeal time has lapsed.
Reapportioning the assessments to the buildable lots would
open the door to appeal, which should be avoided.
Atty. asked if Council wanted a guarantee with the owner,
if Council wanted to waive interest, make the deferment four
or five years. Could get a promissory note that the owners
will pay off the assessment in five years interest -free.
Admin. Achen asked if, after the five -year period, Council
could renegotiate that? Atty. indicated yes. Admin.
pointed out that property owners on a fixed income would
want to know what would happen in five years if nothing could
be worked out with adjacent land owners; they'd have to depend
on the good will of the Council at that time to renegotiate.
Atty. Meyers suggested a personal obligation; consideration
being approval of the plat. Mr. Sjodin stated times have changed
and it is rare to find land for back taxes; he didn't think
Council would have to worry about that. Atty. Meyers stated
that if Council agrees with that, then simply go ahead and
approve the plat.
As far as waiving interest, Mr. Sjodin indicated that if it
takes four years to work out an agreement with adjacent property
owners, interest would wipe out any profit the owners would
make at that time. Originally, this land was the Rosenquist's
and valuable land; now it is a detriment to them.
Councilman Pickar stated that Mr. Sjodin has a valid point
inasmuch as the City created this situation. Councilman Pickar
stated being in favor of working out a solution of deferring
interest for a period until such time that agreement can be
made between the land owners or sale of the property involved.
The City has an obligation to work out something for them.
July 26, 1976
Page 8
Councilman Shelquist preferred not to create a substandard
lot, simply because in the future someone may put a house on
it and the City will not be able to stop it; it's the type of
thing enforced in court as a variance. However, the people
do have a problem and Councilman Shelquist favored working
out an agreement stipulating the number of years, deferment
of assessment and forgiving the interest.
Councilman Baumgartner and Hodges agreed.
Atty. Meyers suggested approving preliminary plat and working
out agreement that: no building permits be issued on Outlot B
and defer the assessments for whatever number of years 6
years before it goes back to taxes.
Mr. Sjodin thought Rosenquists would agree because there's no
other solution, as long as there is no personal obligation.
Admin. Achen indicated something could be prepared within 3
weeks and Mr. Sjodin could plan on presenting the hardshell
for the last meeting in August.
MSP Shelquist- Pickar) to approve preliminary plat for the
Rosenquist Addition dated June, 1976, as received by City of
Mounds View on July 20, 1976, final approval being subject
to a satisfactory agreement being drawn up relative to the
deferment of the assessment on Outlot B and further that the
administrator and attorney be instructed to draw up such agree-
ment and negotiate its signing. 4 ayes
Acting Mayor Hodges then asked for staff recommendations on
the Compassion Christian Center, Inc. special use agreement.
Admin. Achen stated staff had met with representatives of the
Center and reviewed the problems enumerated at the public
hearing. The Center had discussed among its own members future
use of that site, whether it might alter its activities and
change the use of the building. From these discussions, the
Center requests and staff recommends that Article IV of the
Special Use Agreement be amended to limit use to not more than
150 elementary /secondary students at any one time; at the time
the enrollment exceeds 100, applicant shall discontinue use
for its bible school. The reasoning being that a lot of problems
enumerated at the public hearing were not so much from elementary/
secondary school but from the bible school which involves more
traffic.
To solve the problems of noise, participants of the school /church
physically going on adjacent properties, and dust, staff recommends
erection of a six foot high redwood screening fence along the
east property line; this fence would be so constructed to
completely screen the view from one side of the fence to the
other side. Agreement with the Center was for completion of
the fence by September 13, 1976.
Because the Center is uncertain as to future use of school,
they question best use of parking lot. If bible school is to
be removed, might be better to make the parking lot into
recreational facility. Admin. Achen indicated the Center
agreed to pave the existing lot with bituminous surface no
later than September 1, 1977.
July 26, 1976 Page 9
Councilman Baumgartner asked the Compassion Christian Center
representative, Pastor John Matthews, what the use of the
garage back in the corner was? Pastor Matthews replied for
storage. Councilman Baumgartner wanted to know if it could
be used for garbage. The Center representative replied they
have no garbage. Councilman Baumgartner questioned the cans
on the east line and noted that they get moved around alot.
It was indicated that these cans do not belong to the Center.
Concerning the parking lot, Councilman Baumgartner asked that
the agreement include that applicant agrees to develop parking
lot according to Chapter 40.05 para. 2. Center had no objection.
Admin. Achen and Councilman Shelquist indicated that stating
hccording to Chapter 40.05" is less restrictive because the
Chapter requires only "dust free" surfacing. Atty. recommended
indicating bituminous surfacing and all other conditions of
Chapter 40.05 para. 2.
Robert Glazer, 2625 Hillview Rd., indicated that he understood
this was not a closed issue and still open to debate. No one
can argue that this is not inconsistent with the Comprehensive
Plan. Council must consider the impact the Center has on the
neighbors. Councilman Hodges stated that putting up the fence
and blacktopping is trying to soothe the problem. Mr. Glazer
responded that these added conditions are merely creating
symptoms for expanded usage. This building started out as a
church, now it is a parochial school.
Leonard Truskowski, 7930 Sunnyside Rd., asked how much the
Comprehensive Plan had cost and Councilman Shelquist indicated
$17,000. Mr. Truskowski stated his opinion as an adjoining
property owner of the Center to be that the present use of
the property is entirely inconsistent with the Comprehensive
Plan. He wanted to know how Council can continually change
this plan at taxpayer's expense. Mr. Truskowski stated that
he had understood from the public hearing that the limit for
the Center would be 15 or nothing and now Council is talking
about double.
Councilman Shelquist stated that he had understood the agree-
ment as the Council was polled last time to be to increase
enrollment to 100. Admin. Achen explained that because the bible
school involves so much traffic, the bible school would be moved
at 100 and after discontinuation of the bible school, enrollment
of the elementary /secondary school could go to 150. This is
only staff recommendation.
MS (Baumgartner Shelquist) to limit the enrollment of the
elementary /secondary students at any one time to 75 as stated
in the existing special use permit.
July 26, 1976 Page 10
Councilman Baumgartner stated that he would not want to deny
youngsters of education the Center can provide; but Council
has commitments to the property owners around the building.
The Center is on special use now and it is out of the question
to double the use.
Councilman Pickar stated that Council approved in concept raising
the limit to 100, so he is in favor of going to the 100 originally
set up rather than moving it back to the limit of 75. Acting
Mayor Hodges agreed.
Councilman Baumgartner indicated that the previous vote was 4 to 1
to have staff investigate the possibilities of going to 100;
there was no indication Council would go to 100.
Councilman Shelquist preferred to see the bible school stay
and the school be removed. He stated that that piece of property
is not large enough nor is it currently structured in such
a way that it lends itself to use as a school. It creates
safety hazards for the children there. Except for the bituminous
surfacing, nothing contained in Articles 6 and 10 of the special
use permit is any different than what is required of all residents
of Mounds View in Chapter 40. Therefore, there is nothing to
negotiate. It is a matter of enforcing the laws of Mounds View.
Councilman Shelquist also stated that an adults recreation
may consist of going outside to have a cigarette, compared to
children running and playing and walking 6 blocks to the park
for recreation.
Pastor Johns Matthews of the Center expressed the Center's
intent of providing good schooling, good examples and good
counseling to persons in Mounds View and surrounding communities.
He stated that if there is no place for considering the "good"
of the school in the decision, Mounds View is in a sad state.
Roll call vote on the motion: Councilman Pickar nay
Councilman Shelquist aye
Councilman Baumgartner aye
Councilman Hodges nay
Motion failed.
MS (Hodges Pickar) to increase the enrollment to 150 with the
stipulation that the staff recommendations for fence, parking lot
and bible school be enforced; new Article X to be complied with
by September 13, 1976 and Article VI complied with by September
1, 1977; and adding to revised Article VI after "bituminous
surfacing" "and to meet the requirements of Chapter 40.05
para. 2 no later than September 1, 1977
Councilman Pickar stated that since we learned that there was a
school operating at the Center, the Center has cooperated
extensively in trying to meet all the demands of the Council.
Had the Center not brought this to our attention, we would have
a hard time knowing whether they had 120 or 75 students.
July 26, 1976 Page 11
Councilman Baumgartner stated they had to bring the building
up to fire code or they couldn't have a school
MSP(Shelquist- Hodges) to amend the motion to reduce enrollment
to 100 as was the intent of Council a month ago at the public
hearing.
Councilman Baumgartner again stated that the 100 limit was
not agreed to, it was to be studied.
Roll call vote: Councilman Pickar aye
Councilman Shelquist aye
Councilman Baumgartner nay
Acting Mayor Hodges aye
Roll call vote on main motion as amended:
Councilman Pickar aye
Councilman Shelquist nay
Councilman Baumgartner nay
Acting Mayor Hodges aye
Special Use Permit remains as is.
Pastor Matthews questioned purchasing a vacant lot next
door. Atty. Meyers stated the Center is a non conforming
use and under the law, you can't expand a non conforming
use. Rezoning would be the next step, and the Atty. doubted
it would do them any good.
Richard Gunn of Upper Midwest Promotions, Inc. appeared
before the Council to request a resolution from them for
a boxing match to be held August 4, 1976, at the Bel Rae
Ballroom. Atty. Meyers stated that MN Statutes requires
the promoter to be licensed with the State and have a
consenting resolution from the individual city. Attorney
General opinion indicates that if City wanted to license
boxing matches, it could be done and perhaps charge a fee.
Councilman Baumgartner asked about serving alcohol during
the match? Mr. Gunn stated that the Boxing Commission
prohibits it being served in glasses, only paper cups.
Councilman Baumgartner stated he didn't like the procedures,
setting up the bout and then coming to the Council and asking
consent. He suggested granting this one bout and in the mean-
time draft an ordinance regulating this activity. Councilman
Baumgartner also asked if the Bel Rae would have extra police
on duty? Mr. Gunn explained that there would be two Mounds
View policemen on duty and 6 or 9 security guards=
Councilman Picker stated he had talked earlier in the day to
the Mounds View Police Chief and the Chief had indicated he
would like to see the match come and give it a try.
Amendment carried.
Motion failed.
Admin. Achen stated that the Police Dept. had done considerable
background check on all persons involved and found no problems
with the organization itself or the persons involved with it.
July 26, 1976 Page 12
Admin. had also talked to the Minneapolis Police Dept. and they
indicated no problems. Staff's basic recommendation is that
if Council is inclined to allow it, that Council should consider
limiting the activity the first time to one initial contest
to find out if it would be successful and after that event,
develop more specific regulations. Chief Grabowski had recom-
mended two law enforcement officers be present and limit the
hours to midnight and that the applicant provide evidence of
State licensing.
Mr. Gunn stated they have held bouts in Golden Valley and there
they didn't need consent of Council; Falcon Heights and didn't
need Council approval. He indicated Upper Midwest Promotions
is new and have only promoted three fIhts.
Mr. Gunn indicated that the main event has to start before
10:00 p.m., so normal closing hours are before 11:00 p.m. Mr.
Gunn also stated that the promoter pays the police officers.
Admin. Achen pointed out that as we have more and more of these
type of events necessi the presence of police officers,
City officers are spending more and more time on off -duty hours,
possibly affecting their performance on -duty. Eventually,
the demand for these type of events becomes so great that the
officers would rather work solely for these events. Admin.
indicated he would like to Aicrnurage specifying Mounds View
policemen must be is attendance. Acting Mayor Hodges suggested
adding a patrolman, and Admin. indicated that perhaps in the
future it would be possible.
Councilman Shelquist stated he was opposed to having even one
trial match because he feels Mounds View doesn't have the proper
facilities; however, if it's possible that boxing matches will
be allowed we must begin drawing up regulations governing it.
Atty Meyers indicated the resolution authorizing the boxing
matches to be held at the Bel Rae Ballroom on August 4, 1976,
should specify the following conditions: premises to be closed
at midnight, promoter to furnish City copy of State license, set-
ups and beer to be dispensed in paper cups only, two sworn uniformed
police officers approved by Mounds View Police Chief to be in
attendance, and six other security /crowd control personnel also
to be approved by Mounds View Police Chief to be in attendance,
officers and security personnel to be reimbursed by promoter,
city to be reimbursed $300 for administrative overhead to
process original application. All of these restrictions to be
included as Resolution No. 748.
MSP (Baumgartner Pickar) to approve Resolution No. 748.
Council recessed for five minutes.
3 ayes
1 nay
July 26, 1976 Page 13
Animal Pound Contract with Brighton Veterinary Clinic. Atty.
Meyers stated that in paragraph 14 where the contract states
the poundkeeper shall hold the City harmless from
add "improper disposition Council held over this item until
the next meeting.
The "Diseased Trees" ordinance was held over from the last
meeting for purposes of clarifying the "5 day" requirement
for removing trees. Explanation was given that 5 days was
the minimum time for removal of trees.
MSP (Baumgartner- Hodges) to approve Ordinance No. 251 amending
Chapter 92 of the Municipal Code concerning "Diseased Trees 4 ayes
Admin. Achen explained that the proposed Resolution No. 749 and
Ordinance No. 251 are to incorporate a reduced fence permit
fee and to extend the expiration period of permits to 120 days.
Atty. Meyers explained the City began charging the high permit
fee for a fence ($21 minimum) when the City was spending time
determining boundaries. The inspection department will only
be concerned about structural quality of fence and meeting
zoning requirements. Being sure the fence is on the owner's
property is entirely up to the owner with adoption of this
ordinance and resolution. The fence permit fee will be a flat
$10 fee.
The amendment on days for expiration of permits and completion
of work (120 days) brings the City into conformity with other
cities and allows the City to purchase the standard permit
form which states these time limits.
Admin. Achen that this ordinance also establishes a plan
check fee for single family residential permits in the amount
of 20% of the amount of the permit fee. Admin. explained
that staff is spending more time in plan checks basically
because of the new energy regulations and our increased
attention to zoning matters. Steve Rose of the Inspection
Dept. figures he spent four hours with Chief Fagerstrom alone
on the fire conditions for Perkins.
MSP (Hodges Pickar) to adopt Ordinance No. 252 amending Chapter
59 of the Municipal Code regarding permit fees. 4 ayes
Councilman Baumgartner questioned what a resident has to do
to get a permit for a fence? Admin. Achen replied pay $10
and present plans showing location, overall construction, heights,and
lot lines as point of reference although the City will not be
actually concerned with the lot line placement. Atty Meyers
stated that in this way if neighbors complain about placement
of fence, it is a civil matter and the City will not be involved.
Councilman Pickar stated that actually the City has been getting
itself involved where it had no business as far as fences were
concerned.
MSP (Baumgartner Shelquist) to adopt Resolution No. 649 revising
permit fees. 4 ayes
July 26, 1976 Page 14
Admin. Achen explained Resolution No. 750 requesting Metropolitan
Council HRA to apply for Rehabilitation Grant Funds for imple-
mentation within the City of Mounds View. He stated this resolu-
tion is to request participation in the program; the City will
know at a later date what the City's responsibilities in terms
of monies will be. This is to encourage and facilitate the
rehabilitation of homes through grants, loans, etc. basically
to meet the minimum Code standards, not luxury items.
MSP (Hodges Pickar) to adopt Resolution No. 750. 4 ayes
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Admin. Achen indicated that the City
expects to receive HUD authorization to commence Community
Development Block Grant housing inspection program on July 27th.
He also stated the the Mounds View School District will be
dedicating the lighted A11- District Athletic Field at Irondale,
September 17, at the Irondale vs. Mounds View football game.
The District would like the Councilmen to attend and will be
sending letters at a later date. Also, the 1975 financial
statement will be reviewed at Council's next agenda session.
Admin. Achen stated that Steven Rose, Building Inspector,
will be offered a job with another City at the end of the week.
The other City had phoned the Admin. basically out of courtesy to
inform Mounds View of the offer. Admin. Achen stated he would
like to recommend a salary increase commensurate with the
responsibilites of the Building Inspectors position. Should
Mr. Rose accept the offered position with the other City, the
Admin. would like to see the increased salary so that he can
fill the position with a capable person. Recommended increase
is from $1,150 /mo. to $1,300 /mo. and the title to be established
as Building and Zoning Official. Then, beginning, January 1,
1977, increase the salary 6 bringing the position's salary
to 85% of the Metropolitan average for the position. Admin.
Achen stated the current salary rate would recruit only a
building inspector with no supervisory capabilities. Our
present inspector is capable and merits the raise. However, the
major concern is to be able to recruit a capable person should
Mr. Rose decide to accept the other City's offer.
Councilman Baumgartner asked where the additional financing for
the raise would come from? Admin. Achen responded from the
excess indicated at the last Council meeting. The balance
for this year would be $1,000 increase.
MSP (Pickar Shelquist) Effective August 1, 1976, to authorize
City Administrator to make a salary adjustment for the
additional sum of $150 per month for Steve Rose, the increase
to be used to find a replacement if Mr. Rose does indeed leave. 4 ayes
Atty. Meyers presented a resolution to authorize reconveyance
of certain parcels of land to the State of MN, whereby they
could reconvey the land to certain interested parties. This
is the land near Ardan Ave. and Knollwood. When the new
street was put through, there was surplus land left and that
is what we are reconveying to the State.
July 26, 1976 Page 15
MSP (Baumgartner Shelquist) to approve Resolution No. 751
reconveying forfeited land to the State of Minnesota. 4 ayes
Atty. stated the resolution must be completed, signed, one
copy to be certified and the deed has to be signed by the
mayor and clerk and notarized. One resolution and deeds
go down to the State.
ENGINEER HUBBARD had no report.
COUNCILMAN PICKAR reported that Mr. Wakefield is leaving
as chairman of the Lakeside Park Commission. Wayne Betker
was elected vice chairman and will then serve as chairman
once Mr. Wakefield leaves. There is one vacancy which
they hope to fill come September or October. Regarding the
floating weeds in the Lake, for lack of a better solution
guards are dragging weeds out each morning and the weeds
float back each night. Budget for the Commission will probably
be ready in August.
COUNCILMAN SHELQUIST reported the Planning Commission will
meet Wednesday evening and has a lengthy agenda. He also
asked where the City stands on obtaining a vehicle and
abatement officer. Admin. Achen stated specifications were sent
out for the van and as far as he knows the Police Dept. has
only two names of people for the abatement officer job.
COUNCILMAN BAUMGARTNER had no report.
ACTING MAYOR HODGES would like a letter to be sent to the
Bicentennial Commission thanking them for a job well done.
Acting Mayor Hodges also said he had been talking to a member
of the Mobile Home Association who had said they would hand
out information at the State Fair on mobile home ordinance
once we adopted it. Admin. Achen stated that the mobile
home ordinance will be on the agenda for approval at the
August 23rd Council meeting. Acting Mayor Hodges asked that
the Admin. contact the Mobile Home Association about
the method of tying down trailers
MSP (Baumgartner Shelquist) to adjourn at 12:10 a.m. 4 ayes
Respectfully submitted,
Mark Achen
Clerk- Administrator
7YpleiC