HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 1978/02/21PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A special meeting of the Mounds View City Council to receive public
input regarding Project 1978 -1, Storm Sewer Improvements, was
called to order by Mayor Pickar at 7:30 PM on February 21, 1978, at
the Bel Rae Ballroom, 5394 Edgewood Drive, Mounds View, MN 55112.
Members present: Also present:
Mayor Pickar
Councilmember Baumgartner
Councilmember Rowley
Councilmember Ziebarth
Mayor Pickar introduced representatives of the city's consulting
engineer firm for the storm sewer project, Short, Elliott, Hendrickson
and Associates: Roger Short, Jerry Sunde, Don Christopherson, and Dick
Moore; and Seegar Swanson, representing Ehlers and Associates, the
city's financial consultant.
Mayor Pickar stated that any written comments received would become
part of the public hearing record and stated that comments had been
received already from:
Mr. and Mrs. Emmett Welter
Emily Thomas
Juris and Virginia Pogainis
Thomas M. Willmus
Arthur and Blanche Abbott
Edmond and Helen Voltin
Donald R. Miegel
W. D. Barth, Jr.
Mrs. John E. Whipple
Richard H. Comben
Howard Neisen
Harry and Alice Johnson
Clerk Administrator Achen
Engineer Hubbard
2102 Oakwood Drive
7025 Pleasant View Drive
8290 Spring Lake Road
T. M. Willmus Construction
8270 Spring Lake Road
7337 Spring Lake Road
2621 Clearview Avenue
2948 Springview Lane
2757 Sherwood Road
2832 Woodcrest Drive
5150 Irondale Road
7900 Red Oak Drive
Mayor Pickar stated that written comments would be accepted at City
Hall up to 4:30 PM on March 15, 1978, and would also become part
of the public hearing record. Mayor Pickar stated that sore letters
would be referred on to the engineers for answers to technical questions.
Administrator Achen presented background of the proposed project. He
stated that during the spring of 1975 Mounds View experienced heavy
rains which resulted in flooding problems throughout the city. The
City Council held two emergency meetings on the problems, which many
residents attended and described their drainage problems. In response
the Council ordered an engineering study to determine the solutions
to these drainage problems.
In November, 1974, Short, Elliott, Hendrickson Assoc., a consulting
engineer firm, was selected to perform the study. Short, Elliott,
Hendrickson submitted a plan to the Council in draft form in August,
1976. Two City Council work sessions were devoted to reviewing the
firm's methodology, data and recommendations, and on November 15,
1976, the Council formally accepted the plah. The plan was approved
by the Rice Creek Watershed District in May, 1977.
February 21, 1978 Page 2
Administrator Achen reported that again in June, 1977, heavy rains
caused flooding problems in Mounds View. As a result, on August 8,
1977, the City Council ordered a feasibility study on implementation
of the drainage plan for the entire city. Several meetings with the
City Council, consulting engineers, financial advisors, city attorney
and staff followed in October and November, 1977. On November 28,
1977, the City Council formally received the feasibility study for a
city -wide storm sewer improvement project and set a public hearing for
February. 21, 1978. Administrator Achen made a slide presentation of
water problems that had occurred after the heavy rains, showing
locations around the city that were under water.
Roger Short, of Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, introduced Don Christopherson,
the project engineers, Jerry Sunde, the consulting hydrologisg, and
Dick Moore, an engineer, and stated that they had begun working on the
project in November, 1975, and that part of the contract had stated
that the study was to be one of ground water control, as well as a
study of surface water drainage.
Mr. Short stated that the plan his 4irm has presented to the city uses
a five year storm design, which means that the storm sewers will be
constructed to handle a storm of the size that is likely to occur
once every five years. Existing drainage facilities in Mounds View
are of inadequate capacity to carry storm water runoff from even a
three year frequency storm. The proposed drainage project would accommo-
date full residential, commercial and industrial development of the
city, and would provide a trunk system that could be expanded as
needed when new homes or businesses were constructed on presently vacant lands.
Mr. Short reported that virtually all of the city drains to Rice Creek
with most of the drainage entering the Creek upstream of Long Lake.
Project 1978 -1 would redistribute the drainage so that a major portion
enters Rice Creek via Spring Creek, which is downstream from Long Lake.
This feature would reduce runoff pollution of the lake and is an impor-
tant element in the Rice Creek Watershed District's attempt to improve
the quality of Long Lake.
The three existing outflow points to Rice Creek are all to be expanded,
with a second 54 inch pipe to be installed at the existing Hillview
I -35W outlet. On Co. Rd. H east of Edgewood Dr. a 48 inch line
will serve as the primary outlet, and at Spring Creek the existing
36 inch pipe under Co. Rd. H will be paralleled with a 48 inch line.
Detention basins are planned in several areas to limit ponding during
heavy runoff periods to specially designed sites. The largest basin is
to be located north of the Scotland Green Apartments on Co. Rd. H -2,
which will detain up to 93 acre feet of storm water and is designed to
be part of Silver View Community Park. The second largest basin with
85 acre feet capacity is planned north of. New T.H.10 on Judicial Ditch No. 1
Mr. Short reported that the project is proposed to be constructed in
three phases during the 1978, 1979 and 1980 construction seasons. Phase
would include the detention basin north of Scotland Green Apartments,
which will drain southward via a pipe along Silver Lake Road to
Woodcrest Drive and then westward to Spring Creek at Knollwood Drive.
Spring Creek will be cleaned to handle increased capacity and its outlet
to Rice Creek improved. A 60 inch pipe will extend north of the Scotland
Green detention basin, cross existing Highway 10 at County Road I, and
T
February 21, 1978 Page 3
continue north to Hillview Road along Eastwood Road. Phase I would
also include construction of a small detention basin south of Hillview
Road at Greenfield Avenue, with its outlet to be a 24 inch pipe
installed on Oakwood Drive to flow eastward to the Rice Creek outlet at
Quincy Street. Lateral storm sewers from County Road I and Jackson
Drive would connect to this.
Phase II would provide storm sewer laterals to connect the area generally
north of Hillview Road and west of Long Lake Road to the Spring Creek
trunk system built in Phase I. It would also include a 60 inch trunk
system running from east of the Launching Pad Supper Club south across
Highway 10 and County Road H to Rice Creek. To this system would be
connected lateral lines draining the area generally north of existing
Highway 10, south of County Road I, and west of Quincy Street. Phase II
would also include lateral improvements to drain the area generally
north of Hillview Road and east of Long Lake Road to the Rice Creek
outlet at Quincy Street.
Phase III would provide lateral extensions in several areas of the city
to connect them with the three trunk systes established in Phases I
and II.
Mr. Short presented a slide presentation, showing how the proposed
system would go through the City and the phases of the project.
Mr. Sunde gave a geological background of Mounds View. He stated that
between April 1975 and July 1975, the water level rose approximately
51/2 feet, and that in checking into other data available for the area,
he found that the water levels that were experienced in 1975 were
also experienced at other times, and had determined that rather than
the 1975 instances being an extremely rare case, they were more the
norm. He stated that the problem seemed more severe, however, because
of the increase in housing.
Mr. Sunde also stated that the proposed storm sewer system would not be
a cure -all but would certainly help alleviate much of the problem.
Mr. Short presented a graph prepared by Engineer Hubbard, showing the
required capacity of the system versus the present capacity.
Seegar Swanson, of Swanson, Ehlers and Associates stated that the project
would be constructed in three phases and financed in three phases. He
also stated that the cost estimates have taken inflation into account,
and that all cost estimates were'mad6 on the high side.
Mr. Swanson reported that the City had applied for Federal Assistance
but was rejected by the Department of Housing and Urban Development
but that outside assistance might still come through.
Mr. Swanson stated that the Council has taken into consideration the fact
that the northwest corner of Mounds View was recently assessed for storm
sewer laterals under Project 1973 -4, and that property owners in that
area would not be specially assessed for the new project. Other areas in
the City would be assessed at a rate equivalent to that paid by the
property owners included in Project 1973 -4, and that these special
February 21, 1978 Page 4
assessments would pay 52 percent of the project cost, with the balance
to be financed by an annual increase in the general property tax levy
of not more than 3.76 mills.
Mr. Swanson reported that the property assessed for storm sewers in
Project 1973 -4 were assessed at an average rate of 3.97 cents per
square foot, which is the same rate that will be used in Project 1978 -1.
Non residential properties would be assessed double the residential
rate, or 7.97 cents per square foot. The assessments would be spread
over 20 years at 8 percent interest, with the first installments due in
1981.
Mr. Swanson presented assessments on three hypothetical residential
lots, to show what the residents could expect to be assessed. An
11,000 square foot lot would be assessed approximately $437.02, with
the first payment in 1981 to be $65.55, and the last payment in 2001
to be $23.60, with the average annual payment to be $44.58.
A 13,000 square foot lot would be assessed $516.48, with the first
payment in 1981 to be $77.47, the last payment in 2001 to be $27.89,
and the average annual payment to be $52.74.
A 20,000 square foot lot would be assessed $794.59, with the first pay-
ment to be $119.19, the last payment to be $42.91, and the average
annual payment to be $81.05.
Mr. Swanson reported that approximately 34 percent of the single family
homes in Mounds View have a limited market value of $20,000 or less,
36 percent with a $30,000 limited market value or less, and 27 percent
with a $30,000 to $40,000 limited market value, and only 3 percent above
the $40,000 level. The annual tax impact on a levy of 3.76 mills would
be $21.62 on the $20,000 home, $36.66 on the $30,000 home, $51.70 on
the $40,000 home, and $66.74 on the $50,000 home. A business property
with a market value of $50,000 would be taxed $80.84, a $100,000 business
would be taxed $161.64, and a $150,000 business would be assessed
$242.52.
Mayor Pickar stated that a decision on the project would be announced
by the Council at the March 27, 1978 meeting at City Hall. Mayor Pickar
then opened the floor for citizen questions on the project.
Mark Berube, 2118 Oakwood Drive stated that he had lived in Mounds View
for 24 years and had never had water problems and that he felt the pro-
blems being experienced now were due to building houses on swampy areas,
and asked where that water was to go.
Mayor Pickar replied that the intent of the project was to give that
water somewhere to go. Mr. Short added that the lower the grade of the
land, the more the City would be subject to flooding and stated that
according to the contour map, only one -third of the City should actually
have been built upon if they did not want to face the issue of drainage
problems.
Mr. Berube asked why 100 percent of the people were being asked to pay
for the project when only 10 percent of the people had water problems.
February 21, 1978 Page 5
Mr. Short replied that every person who owned a house had water running
off it, which contributed to the problem for everyone else.
Phil Johnson, 7474 Groveland Road questioned how the $437.02 assessment
figure was arrived at, if interest was paid at 8 percent a year for 20
years.
Mr. Swanson replied that the $437.02 was the amount of assessment, and
that if it were paid in full when first assessed, there would be no
additional cost, but if the property owner chose to spread it out over
the 20 years, the interest would be added in.
Duane McCarthy, 8060 Long Lake Road stated that he was interested in the
square footage assessment and asked how much of a tax increase could be
expected.
Mr. Swanson replied that the year 2000 is the final payment year for the
project and that the tax rate was based on what is presently used, and
that no changes were taken into consideration in assessment formulas,
and thus, if the State did change the formula, the rate would change
accordingly.
Mr. McCarthy questioned how much importance was placed on Well 25, which
Mr. Sunde had used during the slide presentation.
Mr. Sunde replied that he had chosen Well 25 just as a visual example
to present, but that the study had included all wells.
Bob Glazer, 2625 Hillview Read questioned why the project was brought
up at a public hearing rather than a referendum.
Administrator Achen replied that as written in Chapter 429 of Minnesota
Statutes, a City Council decision is required and a public vote or
referendum is not necessary. He added that a referendum has no
legal bearing or weight and could only advise the Council of the public
feeling, which is what the public hearing was intended for.
Mr. Glazer asked what the criteria was for assessing benefit to property
since many would be paying for the project but few would be directly
benefitted by it.
Mayor Pickar replied that not everyone would be getting assessed for the
project, as anyone who had been assessed during 1973 -4 would not be
assessed again.
Mr. Glazer read the definition from the State Attorney General for deter
ming benefit to property and stated that he did not believe all the homes
would increase in property value.
Mr. Swanson stated that the burden of proof is to show that the property
in question increased in value and stated that the figures he had pre-
sented earlier were not legal or valid until an assessment hearing is
held. He added that at that time the City will obtain an estimate of
increased market values but that if the increases could not be shown,
the assessments could not be levied. He stated that the time frame for
February 21, 1978 Page 6
the assessment hearing would be 1980.
Mr. Glazer questioned how undeveloped property would be assessed. Mr.
Swanson replied that assessments for unplatted land would be made based
upon zoning classification of that land. In single family zones it
would be assessed 3.97 cents per square foot and in commercial /industrial
zones, 7.94 cents per square foot.
Mr. Glazer asked what land would have to be acquired during the land
acquisition.
Mr. Short replied that private land for the impounding basis would have
to be acquired, and construction easements across private lands.
Fred Baty, 2316 Hillview Road questioned why there was such a difference
between the dollar estimate in the legal notice, of $6,500,00 and that
which was in the bulletin in March 1977 of $1,500,000.
Administrator Achen replied that the the estimate in the bulletin had
referred to the HUD application for just the east half of the City,
east of Long Lake Road. He added that the west half of the City con-
tained most of the difficult areas. Administrator Achen stated that
HUD ranks the applications by order of priority, with priority being
given to the poor and low income.
Jerry Fahrmann, 7448 Spring Lake Road asked if a building moritorium
would be a better answer to the drainage problem.
Mayor Pickar replied that the Council had discussed a building mori-
torium but that the land owers are presently paying taxes and have
a right to build on their property.
Mr. Short added that there have been flooding problems in the past,
with water ponding problems and that while development has taken
place since then, problems still would have occurred without the
development.
Mr. Fahrmann asked what the material taken while digging the holding
ponds will be replaced with.
Mr. Sunde replied that the ponds are filled with organic soils, 10
to 20 feet deep, so that they would not be penetrating the soils when
excavating.
Dennis Pietrek, 2280 Pinewood Drive asked what portion of the water
problems could be attributed to poor maintenance.
Mayor Pickar replied that the problems have been experienced because
there was no place for the water to go, not because of maintenance
problems.
Dick Lind, 2244 Terrace asked how people on set incomes were going to
be able to pay for the project, such as senior citizenF handicapped,
and poor people.
Mayor Pickar replied that there are regulations regard ig assessing
February 21, 1978 Page 7
senior citizens and that they would be discussed at the time of an
assessment hearing.
Mr. Lind added that he felt anyone who built in an area with water
problems should be responsible for putting in their own drain tile
and sealing their basements at their own expense.
Cathy Roth, 5108 Sunnyside Road stated that she felt there definitely
were areas of Mounds View that needed a drainage system and asked what
would happen if the project was not approved by the Council.
Mr. Short replied that there were a number of different approaches
open to the City but stated that the main problem was that most of
the problem areas are a long way from an outlet, and that each
area a reasonable distance from the outlet should be put in first,
which would involve more expense than the other sections. He added
that the critical development amounted to 80 percent of the total
cost'.of the project. Mr. Short stated that the Council could decide
to build just partial sections, which would be a partial solution.
Phil Carlson, 8148 Red Oak Drive questioned why the issue was being
handled differently that a school bond and why the citizens could not
vote on it.
Mayor Pickar replied that the law was written that way and that the
best way for the Council to handle it was to get as much input from
the citizens as possible.
Mr. Carlson asked if municipal bonds would pay for the project and
questioned why 8 percent interest would be charged if the bonds are
tax free.
Mr. Swanson replied that there is a cost to the City to provide install-
ment payments but that each citizen has the right to pay his assessment
in full when first assessed, and thus avoid any interest payment.
Mr. Carlson questioned how he could be benefited by the project when
he had never had water in his basement in twelve years.
Mayor Pickar replied that benefit would have to be determined at an
assessment hearing.
Mr. Sunde added that the storm sewer project does not claim to solve
everyones problems but attempts to reduce them as much as possible.
David Perry, 2466 Clearview Avenue questioned how the cost effectiveness
was planned if the project was not going to help people with water in
their basements.
Mr. Short replied that if everyone who had water problems calculated
the gallons of water that went down the sewer at 36 cents per thousand
gallons, cost effectiveness could be determined.
February 21, 1978
Page 8
Glen Dawson, 2201 Lambert Drive stated that he had already paid for
drainage problems once and should not be assessed again.
Mayor Pickar replied that anyone who had not been assessed for the
1973 -4 project would be assessed with the 1978 -1 project.
Mr. Swanson added that a good share of the benefit of a storm sewer
system for a City is reduced street upkeep costs, and that a good
portion of this project would be a benefit to the community as a whole
and thus should be assessed to the whole community.
Gary Appleby, 2308 LaPort Drive asked if bids had been received from
other firms for the project.
Mayor Pickar replied that nine firms submitted bids to the City for
conducting the study, and that three were then selected to make a
presentation, at which time Short, Elliott and Hendrickson was selected.
Mr. Short added that a contract was signed with the City for a firm
amount of money and that the study was completed for that same amount
of money.
Mayor Pickar added that the City has extreme confidence in the firm
of Short, Elliott and Hendrickson.
Lorraine Bonin, 8380 Pleasant View Drive stated that she lives in the
northeast area that was already assessed for project 1973 -4 and stated
that the residents of the area were assessed 100 percent of the project
and wondered why the assessments for 1978 -1 would only be 52 percent,
while the rest of the City would be required to pick up the remaining
48 percent.
Mr. Swanson replied that 100 percent of the cost of the project were
assessed earlier for a local system only, but that 1978 -1 includes
major structures and installations that will include all parts of the
City, and thus, water from all parts of the City will be travelling
through the structure.
Mayor Pickar added that the local system must tie into the major system
and cannot be isolated.
Mrs. Bonin stated that she felt it was the responsibility of each home
owner not to build on a wet lot.
Gerald Field, 2255 Lambert Avenue questioned if all the proposed lines
were really necessary and questioned how large the hole would be between
Lambert and Jackson.
Mr. Short replied that all the lines were necessary and that the particu-
lar one at Lambert and Jackson would be a 15 inch and 24 inch pipe and
that the size of the hole would depend upon conditions at the time it
was being dug. He added that easments would be required for the work.
February 21, 1978 Page 8
Glen Dawson, 2201 Lambert Drive stated that he had already paid for
drainage problems once and should not be assessed again.
Mayor Pickar replied that anyone who had not been assessed for the
1973 -4 project would be assessed with the 1978 -1 project.
Mr. Swanson added that a good share of the benefit of a storm sewer
system for a City is reduced street upkeep costs, and that a good
portion of this project would be a benefit to the community as a whole
and thus should be assessed to the whole community.
Gary Appleby, 2308 LaPort Drive asked if bids had been received from
other firms for the project.
Mayor Pickar replied that nine firms submitted bids to the City for
conducting the study, and that three were then selected to make a
presentation, at which time Short, Elliott and Hendrickson was selected.
Mr. Short added that a contract was signed with the city for a firm
amount of money and that the study was completed for that same amount
of money.
Mayor Pickar added that the City has extreme confidence in the firm
of Short, Elliott and Hendrickson.
Lorraine Bonin, 8380 Pleasant View Drive stated that she lives in the
northeast area that was already assessed for project 1973 -4 and stated
that the residents of the area were assessed 100 percent of the project
and wondered why the assessments for 1978 -1 would only be 52 percent,
while the rest of the City would be required to pick up the remaining
48 percent.
Mr: Swanson replied that 100 percent of the cost of the project were
assessed earlier for a local system only, but that 1978 -1 includes
major structures and installations that will include all parts of the
City, and thus, water from all parts of the City will be travelling
through the structure.
Mayor Pickar added that the local system must tie into the major system
and cannot be isolated.
Mrs. Bonin stated that she felt it was the responsibility of each home
owner not to build on a wet lot.
Gerald Field, 2255 Lambert Avenue questioned if all the proposed lines
were really necessary and questioned how large the hole would be between
Lambert and Jackson.
Mr. Short replied that all the lines were necessary and that the particu-
lar one at Lambert and Jackson would be a 15 inch and 24 inch pipe and
that the size of the hole would depend upon conditions at the time it
was being dug. He added that easments would be required for the work.
February 21, 1978 Page 9
David Notaro, 2749 Ardan Avenue
View as a good place to live and
bought his home that there was a
spent $500 to raise the level of
a sump pump system.
Mr. Notaro stated that with the
out of the sewers into his yard
of water in their basement. Mr.
cerned with drainage runoff and
neighborhood after the rain last
City Council had been responsive
NE stated that he had chosen Mounds
that he realized at the time he
water problem. He stated that he
his yard, and put in drain tile and
storm last June he had water coming
and that his neighbors had 14 inches
Notaro added that he was most con
showed a film of the water in his
June. He stated that he felt the
to the issue.
Bill Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road questioned how many people were affected
by the flood.
Mayor Pickar replied that approximately 70 homes reported that they
had water problems in some way or another.
Mr. Werner asked when the assessment hearing would be held.
Mayor Pickar replied that a date had not been set yet as the Council
must first make a decision on whether to do the project or not.
Mr. Swanson added that he expected to be able to prove benefit at the
assessment hearing and that assessments had to be made in a uniform
manner, and that if the project is ordered, the assessment hearing would
be tentatively set for 1980 after construction is completed.
Mr. Werner asked who would be responsible for paying for the project
if benefit could not be determined.
Mr. Swanson replied that the City would have to change the assessment
pattern, as the law provides.
Mr. Werner asked what would be done with the input received from the
public during the hearing.
Mayor Pickar replied that everything would be taken into consideration
and an answer would be forthcoming at the March 27 Council meeting,
and added that the minutes were being officially recorded.
Neil Loeding, 5046 Longview Drive asked how often the City could expect
storms such as the ones in 1975 and 1977.
Mr. Short replied that the 1975 storm was considered a ten year storm,
and the 1977 storm a one year storm, and that the impounding basins
would be set up for a 50 year storm.
Mayor Pickar added that in assessing what the City's requirements were,
Short, Elliott and Hendrickson took into consideration what the City
could afford and what would do the job.
Mr. Short added that his firm had been responsible for carrying out
the design of the storm sewer system in his own neighborhood, and had
February 21, 1978 Page 10
designed it on a five year basis. Mr. Short stated that his house
sits low and he has a pond in back but has never had any water pro-
blems in the six years the system has been in.
Mr. Short also stated that it would be more expensive to evaluate each
problem area individually and put in separate systems then it would
to do the whole project at once.
Ray Lang, 7435 Spring Lake Park Road questioned how the 130 acres of
undeveloped land betwen Highway 10, County Road H2, Long Lake Road
and Silver Lake Road are zoned.
Mayor Pickar replied that part of the land was for Silverview Park.
Mr. Lang stated that he understood the owner of the property was anxious
to build but had been told by the City that he could not until the City
water problems were solved.
Mayor Pickar added that the land would be assessed the business rate of
7.9 cents per square foot, twice that of single family homes.
Mr. Lang stated that he had a problem with helping to pay for a large
company to be able to build.
Mr. Siedlecki, 2749 Sherwood Road stated that he could not agree to
paying for a system which would benefit just a few people and stated
that he could not afford the tax increase as he was retired. He
also questioned why the City Attorney was not present at the hearing.
Mayor Pickar replied that the City Attorney was out of town on
business.
Owen Hakseth, 5141 Greenwood Drive questioned how much money had been
spent already on the feasibility study.
Mayor Pickar replied that $37,000 had been spent, out of the $40,000
that had been budgeted for.
Mr. Hakseth questioned if the basement of City Hall had flooded during
1975. Mayor Pickar replied that it had and that litigation was pending.
Mr. Hakseth asked what the maintenance and on -going upkeep costs of the pro-
ject would be. Mayor Pickar replied that he was not sure of the
actual cost but that it would be moderate.
Mr. Hakseth questioned how long the system would last. Mr. Short replied
that the system would be of Portland cement, which has been available for
50 years and is holding up fine in other areas. He added that some
systems in Italy have been in existence for 500 years.
Mr. Hakseth asked why the financing would be split betwen an assessment
and taxes.
Mayor Pickar replied that that had been determined as the most equitable
way. Administrator Achen added that one factor had been keeping the
February 21, 1978 Page 11
tax levy at 3.76 mills per year.
John Blohum, 7832 Bona Road asked if the assessments were paid off if
the tax levy would be considered an assessment if he were to sell his
property. Mayor Pickar replied that it would not.
Mr. Blohum asked how the Oakdale basin would be done. Mr. Sunde replied
that the outlet would be lowered a couple of feet so that it would
operate at a lower level.
Mr. Blohum stated that he had put drain tile in his home after the 1975
flood and had not experienced any problem since then.
Glen Westerhein, 2286 Bronson Drive stated that he had lived in Mounds
View for 27 years and that his well had gone dry for the first time
this past year. He added that he felt the City should use the system
that was put in from Lambert Park, and that since he had previously paid
an assessment he should not have to pay again.
Mr. Swanson replied that if Mr. Westerhein had been assessed for 1973 -4
project, he would not be assessed again.
Mr. Westerhein stated that he felt the existing pipes in the City should
be used, rather than putting in a new system. Mr. Short replied that
a complaint was received from one of Mr. Westerhein's neighbors last
summer of water in their basement. Mr. Short also stated that he did
not feel the present system was capable of doing the job required.
Bill Doty, 3049 Bronson Drive asked if an environmental inpact statement
had been done, saying that a storm sewer system should be put in.
Mayor Pickar replied that the City had not yet been directed to do an
environmental inpact study, but that the DNR was contacted for their
approval of the project, which they did give.
Mr. Doty stated that the City Council was voted by the citizens of
Mounds View to represent the citizens of Mounds View and stated that
he would like to know the plans of the Council in advance of any
approval of the project, so that the citizens would have a chance to
take action.
Mayor Pickar replied that official action must be taken at an official
meeting, and that meeting was scheduled for March 27.
Mr. Doty asked how long it would be before work would start if the
project was approved. Mayor Pickar replied that work would not start
for several months. He also recognized that the Council represents
the people of the City and stated that the Council would take all
comments and facts into consideration before making any decision.
Carl Schat, 2808 County Road H2 asked who would be most concerned with
putting a storm sewer system into the City. Mayor Pickar replied that
everyone in the City and government is concerned. He stated that when
there was water in the homes in 1975 and flooded yards, citizens were
in the Council chambers demanding that something be done to solve the
February 21, 1978 Page 12
water problems.
Mr. Schat asked what recourse a citizen would have who definitely did
not want the system. Mayor Pickar replied that the hearing was a good
example of how citizens could state their opinion. He also recommended
that letters be sent to City Hall.
Ernie Gustafson, 2525 County Road I asked if the system would guarantee
that each and every home owner would not have any water problems. Mayor
Pickar replied that that guarantee could not be made.
Mr. Gustafson stated that there were two terrible storms in 1951, one
in July and one in August, and that a system had been put in that time
behind Bel Rae and that there had not been a water problem since then.
Mr. Gustafson also stated that the older citizens must be remembered
when assessments were made, as many were on fixed incomes.
Jim Lossen, 2201 Lambert asked why a questionnaire could not be sent
out to all the citizens for their input. Mayor Pickar replied that
the legal notice of the hearing had been sent to inform everyone, and
that they could verbally give their opinion at the hearing or send
their written comments to City Hall.
Mr. Loeding, 5046 Longview Drive asked what percentage of the Council
was in favor of the project. Mayor Pickar replied that he could not
answer for the whole Council and that the Council was getting input
from the people and would be taking it into consideration before making
a decision. Mayor Pickar also pointed out that many projects have been
approved against the wishes of the majority, but were necessary, such
as city water and so forth.
Mr. Loeding asked if the City would be willing to put the issue to an
unbinding referendum. Mayor Pickar replied that each citizen in Mounds
View that was affected by the project had been notified and thus he did
not feel a referendum would serve any further purpose.
Steve Miller, 2614 Clearview questioned the market value versus the
assessments and stated that he felt it should be known that the $437.02
assessment would end up being closer to $2000 if it were spread out over
20 years. He added that the market value on the property would not
increase that much.
Mr. Swanson replied that property values would increase considerably
more than the assessment amount. Mr. Miller said he would rather live
with the water problem for $2000.
Lloyd Scott, 5100 Red Oak Drive stated that the storm sewer system which
goes by his house is more than adequate and that he did not want to be
assessed again. Mr. Swanson replied that if he was assessed for the
1973 -4 project he would not be assessed again.
Peter Sargent, 2268 Hillview read a request of 104 citizens to the
City Council, that the project not be approved.
Ted Moore, 5454 Jackson Drive stated that he had lived in Mounds View
February 21, 1978
since 1950 and had had water in his basement twice, due to his own
neglect.; Mr Moore stated that he felt it was each individuals own
responsibility to waterproof their homes.
Richard Cherub, 5446 Erickson stated that he would like to thank the
Council -for holding the public hearing and allowing citizens to express
their opinions.
Karen Weijard, 2273 Lois Drive asked what the surrounding communities
to the Rice Creek Watershed district were doing to solve their problems.
Mayor Pickar replied that each City has their own program and each are
handling their own situations in the best way possible.
Bruce Spitz,, 8400 Fairchild stated that it had not been proven that
the project would serve the majority of the people or take care of all
the problems. He also stated that he was confused on why an assessment
hearing would be held after the project was completed. He also requested
that the March 27 Council Meeting be held at the Bel Rae Ballroom again.
Henry Becker, 7350 Spring Lake Road stated that he had already been
assessed $2200 and asked if he would be assessed again. Administrator
Achen replied that each case would be looked at individually. He also
stated that many of the assessments people had mentioned may; have been
sanitary sewer and water services, and not storm sewer assessments.
Mayor Pickar thanked the citizens for their input and stated that all
comments and written letters would be taken into consideration.
Mayor Pickar closed the public hearing at 12:00 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark Achen
City Administrator
Page 13