Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 1982/10/11CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW October 11, 1982 7:30 p.m. A G E N D A 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call Forslund, Blanchard, Doty, Hodges, McCarty 3. Approval of Minutes: September 27, 1982 (Regular Meeting) October 4, 1982 (Special Meeting) 4. Public Hearing 7 :40 p.m. Ordinance No. 318 Creating Municipal Code Chapter 48, "Wetlar3 Zoning Ordinance" 5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 6. Approval of Consent Agenda ITEM A. Approval of Release of $4,165.51 in Final Payment of $52,390.42 to Allied Blacktop for Sealcoating Project 82 -4 ITEM B. Approval of Staff Recommendation of October 4, 1982 Regarding Status of S.E.H. Projects and Authorize Staff to Instruct S.E.H. to Continue or Close Out Projects ITEM C. Approve Resolution No. 1503 Amending Resolution Numbers 1472 and 1497 ITEM D. Approve Resolution No. 1505 Approval of the Completion of Development Agreement No. 80 -39 for Arlin A. Wolf and the Release of the Contract Bond in the Amount of $53,550 ITEM E. Set Bid Opening on November 10, 1982 at 1:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers for the Purchase of New or Used One Ton Dump Truck ITEM F. Licenses for Approval ITEM G. Approve Resolution No. 1504 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds continued- AGENDA October 11, 1982 Page Two 7. Approval of Second Reading of Ordinance No. 318 Amending the Municipal Code of the City of Mounds View by Creating Chapter 48, "Wetland Zoning Ordinance" 8. Third Quarter 1982 Department Head Reports Finance Director Brager Park, Recreation, Forestry Director Anderson Police Chief Grabowski Public Works /Community Development Director Johnson 9. Approval of First Reading of Ordinance No. 321 Amending the Municipal Code of the City of Mounds View by Creating Chapter 49, "Flood Plain Zoning Ordinance" 10. Review of Letter to Past Due Utility and Tree Removal Accounts 11. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Park Shelter Buildings 12. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Golden Gloves Boxing Program 13. Consideration of Park, Recreation, and Forestry Director Anderson's Request for Time Off With Pay to Attend the 1982 National Recreation and Park Association Congress 14. Report of Director of Public Works /Community Development A) Status of Meter Study (Info will be handed out at rn.eeting.) B) Report on County Road H Storm Sewer Repair (Info will be handed out at meeting.) 15. Report of Attorney 16. Report of Councilmembers 17. Report of Administrator 18. Adjournment CONSENT AGENDA October 11, 1982 The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council. The entire Agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any item can be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for debate. ITEM A. Approval of Release of $4,165.51 in Final Payment of $52,390.42 to Allied Blacktop for Sealcoating Project 82 -4 ITEM B. Approval of Staff Recommendation of October 4, 1982 Regarding Status of S.E.H. Projects and Authorize Staff to Instruct S.E.H. to Continue or Close Out Projects ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No. 1503 Amending Resolution Numbers 1472 and 1497 ITEM D. Adopt Resolution No. 1505 'pproval of the Completion of Development Agreement No. 8G -39 for Arlin A. Wolf and the Release of the Contract Bond in the Amount of $53,550 ITEM E. Set Bid Opening on November 10, 1982 at 1:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers for the Purchase of New or Used One Ton Dump Truck ITEM F. Licenses for Approval General Expire 6/30/82 Builders Remodelers, Inc. New Michael Campion Co. New C. S. Cook Builders, Inc. New Robert Dierkhising New Kraus Anderson ;Building Co. New Wayne Roger Homes, Inc. Renewal ITEM G. Adopt Resolution No. 1504 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:37 PM. Mayor McCarty clarified his position, and the feel ings of the Council, regarding the delinquent tax bills as discussed at the September 27 meeting, and misrepresented in the New Brighton Bulletin. He emphasized that the Council was not angry with Staff. Motion /Second: McCarty /Hodges to express a complete and total vote of confidence in favor of the Staff members. 5 ayes 0 nays It was also noted that while the bids came in higher than projected for the Oak Park project, the cost is to be paid by the developer, and not the City. Motion /Second: Doty /Hodges to approve the September 27, 1982 minutes as corrected. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion /Second: McCarty /Forslund to approve the October 4, 1982 minutes as presented. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion /Second: McCarty /Doty to recind the motion made by McCarty, seconded by :Doty, on October 4, 1982, directing Staff to send a second letter in reference to unpaid utility bills. i ayes 0 nays Motion /Second: Forslund /Doty to take Resolution No. 1502 from the table. 5 ayes 0 nays DATE APPROVED: 10/25/82 Regular Meeting October 11, 1982 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Forslund, Blanchard, 2. Roll Call Doty, Hodges and Mayor McCarty. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk /Admini- strator Pauley and Public Works /Community Development Director Johnson. 3. Approval of Minutes: September 27, 1982 and October 4. 1982 Motion Carried Motion Carried Motion Carried Motion Carried Motion Carried Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Two 'Motion/Second: Forslund /Doty to deny Resolution No. 1502. 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened the public hearing at 7:40 PM. James Celt, 7751 Greenwood Drive, stated he owns a lot south of County Road I, whi he has been trying to develop for the past five years, and he feels the proposed ordinance will make the land undevelopable. He stated he has had many meetings in the past, and an engineering study has shown it to be buildable, and in meetings with representatives from FEMA, the flood plain organization, they have stated it was buildable. He added, however, if the ordinance is approved, he cannot build on the property. Mr. Celt asked wh.lt the implications of the ordinance would be for him, and asked whether the City would purchase his land in the flood plain. He also pointed out that his lot has value, and it falls within 100' of the flood plain, and asked if he would be allowed to build. City Attorney Meyers replied that the ordinance will authorize the acquisition of property, if needed to preserve wetlands, but the City would not be purchasing the property by adopting the ordinance. He stated Mr. Celt would have to apply to have his lot considered for development after the ordinance becomes effective and should make application for a building permit. He also advised Mr. Celt to point. out to the Council how the ordinance impacts his property. Mr. Celt stated he is not interested in building on the lot but would like to sell it. Paul Videen, of Midland- Videen, Inc. 2887 No. Wheeler, Roseville, presented a letter to the Council, and read the letter, stating he is in favor of the ordinance but has two problem areas, those being 48.05 Subd. 2, and Subd. 5 -C. Mr. Videen explained he has people who have the ability and are interested in building a commercial building on his property. Perry Langer, 1743 Florence St., White Bear Lake, and '3i11 Langer, 1005 South Circle, Fridley, stated they agreed with Mr. Videen's statements, and asked when the ordinance would take effect. Mayor McCarty replied the ordinance, if adopted this Motion Carried 4. Public Hearing: Ordinance No. 318; Creating Muni- cipal Code Chap- ter 48, "Wetland Zoning Ordinance" Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Three r* m would take approximately 45 days to go into effect. Bruce Malkerson, of Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman Doty, Ltd., 4344 IDS Center, Minneapolis, stated he is representing Messrs. John and Jim Miller, Fred O. Watson Co., and Keith Harstad, all of whom own property within the City. He presented the Council with a lengthy letter regarding the proposed ordinance, and explained he has several unanswered questions, and reviewed many of them. Mr. Malkerson stated he has reviewed the proposed flood plain ordinance, and feels it is important for the City to do the flood plain and wetlands ordinance together. He stated his clients have objections to the ordinance in its present form, and have several unanswered questions, and that without the information they are requesting to answer these questions, they cannot judge the total impact of the ordinance on them. Mr. Malkerson asked that the Council appoint some- one, whether it be a Staff person, Councilmember, or whoever, to sit down with him and his clients and go over their many areas of question, and explain how this ordinance would work. He added that his clients do not want to come in and apply after the ordinance is adopted, and then discover problems. Mr. Malkerson stated he feels the proposed ordinance is a concientious taking, and a violation of rights, and he is putting the City on notice, as he believes the City will be liable for damages if the ordinance is adopted as is. He also asked to be informed of she procedure to be followed for the flood plain ordinance. Mr. Malkerson also suggested several items he feels should be included in the ordinance, as listed on page four of his letter to the Council. He explained that millions of dollars of tax base would be taken off the tax rolls if the ordinance is adopted as is. He also read a Court statement, from 283 N.W.2d 538 at 544, regarding the Court's feelings on taking of property and awarding damages. Mr. Malkerson summarized his stand on the ordinance and asked again for someone to be appointed to work with him and his clients, as only then would they have a better understanding of what the City is trying to accomplish. Fred Watson, of the Fred Watson Co., 252 S. Plaza Building, Minneapolis, stated he has been waiting for the past two years for something to come to a Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Four .head. He questioned how the elevation was deter mined, and stated the wetlands seem to have been determined very arbitrarily and asked who the engineer was. Attorney Meyers replied that the City has been involved with water and wetlands control for a number of years and that it has been working on a wetland ordinance for quite some time, with both City Staff and other profes- sionals working on it. He explained that one of the first priorities was to take an inventory of the wetlands in the City, which was daze with county assistance. He stated that the City had professional, technical help in determining what wetlands were within the City limits and what restrictions should apply. He added the definition of wetlands has been developed through the use of technical data. Mr. Watson asked if there were areas that were definitely shown in the flood plain but left out of the wetlands area, and asked specifically who the engineering people were. Attorney Meyers replied the Cif-y has retained various professionals over the years to aid in the development of the inventory and drafting of the proposed amendment. He added this ordinance will regulate the use of wetlands in the City. Mayor McCarty added that the wetlands inventory was done mainly by the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District. Tom Peterson identified himself as a conservation specialist with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District, and explained the process that was used. He stated the maps were done in the summer of 1980, with air photos taken, and aquatic specialists hired to identify the wetland areas, and the area was then field checked, and the water resources map provided to the City. John Miller stated he has a specific objection to identifying parcel 22 in the northwest corner of his property, Wetland #1 -22, as a wetland, as it is designated as 1.1 acres of wetlands, and he feels it is not. He also stated he has a general objection to the ordinance. Jim Cepress, of Dynamic Designers, 2233 West ounty Road B, Roseville, stated his property ,aas been put in the wetland area, and that he has been in the process for the past two years of trying to develop this property. He stated he was given permission to bring in fill, which Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Five brought it well above the specified level, and 4 iould like to speak to someone about this, as he oes not feel it should be classified a wetland. He was directed to sneak to Director of Public Works/ Community Development Johnson. Keith Harstad stated his objections have been noted through Mr. Malkerson, and that he personally vehemently objects to the ordinance. He stated he owns three parcels which are substantially affected by this ordinance. Mr. Harstad asked that the ordinance be tabled to allow time for them to discuss it further and have their questions answered. Joseph Goebel, 8121 Long Lake Road, identified him- self as a professional soil scientist and geologist, and stated he was very pleased to see the City has finally come forward with a very responsible ordi- nance on the wetlands. He added the issue came out of the City's total water problem, and he feels that wetlands can contribute to the overall quality of life in the City of Mounds View. After asking for any additional comments and receiving none, Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:22 PM. There were no residents requests or comments from the floor. Motion /Second: Blanchard /Hodges to approve the consent agenda as presented, and waive the reading of the resolutions. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion /Second: Forslund /Doty to approve the second reading of Ordinance No. 318 amending the municipal code of the City of Mounds View by creating Chapter 48, "Wetland Zoning Ordinance Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Mayor McCarty Forslund aye Blanchard aye Doty aye Hodges aye aye Mayor McCarty read the suggested language amendments to the ordinance. 5. Residents Re- quests and Comments from the Floor 6. Approval of Consent Agenda Motion Carried 7. Approval of Second Reading of Ord. No. 318 Amending the Municipal Code of the City of Mounds View by Creating Chapter 48, "Wetland Zoning Ordinance" Motion Carried Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Six Iotion /Second: Doty /Blanchard to amend Chapter 48.07 (c) as proposed. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion /Second: Forslund /Hodges to approve the amendment of the language to Chapter 48.08, Subdi- visions 1 and 2. 5 ayes 0 nays Attorney Meyers gave an explanation of the changes in language and how they applied to the ordinance. Director of Public Works /Community Development Johnson presented two items that should be considered with the ordinance, Resolution No. 1389 which requires drai: tile, and Chapter 48.06, Subd. 4, A, 3, which does not include building permits, but clarifies it as subdivi:.ions and condi- tional use permits. He added he did not feel these two items would conflict with the ordinance. Motion /Second: Doty /Forslund to adopt Ordinance No. 318, as amended, amending the municipal code of the City of Mounds View by creating Chapter 48, "Wetland Zoning Ordinance Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Mayor McCarty Forslund aye Blanchard aye Doty aye Hodges aye aye Mr. Malkerson pointed out that some major amendments were adopted that were not part of the prior pub- lications. He stated he has not had an opportunity to determine how these will work. He stated he had asked earlier, and is asking again, for an opportunity to discuss the ordinance and have questions answered. He added it is a matter of procedural due process to delay it for at least two weeks to allow time to have these questions answered. Attorney Meyers responded in his opinion the ordinance and amendments were legal. He added that he has seen few major pieces of legislation that have received the approval of ev-xyone, and that quite a bit of time and deliberation have gone into fulfilling everything that is required. He added that they followed Chapter 462 of the State Statutes, and that due process has been given. He also stated that all suggestions received by the City have been given consideration. .mayor McCarty stated he would like to recognize all the many people who have been very important in this process, such as Dr. Joseph Goebel, Robert Glazer, the Planning Commissioners Gene Anderson, Sharon Motion Carried Motion Carried Motion Carried Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Seven -,McCarthy, Josey Warren, Jean Miller, Ken Breske, Jerry Linke and Chairman Peg Mountin, as well as all the people who worked long hours and attended many meetings. Mayor McCarty gave a special thanks to Neil Loeding, and presented him with a certificate of thanks, declaring him the official "Keeper of the Cattails Mayor McCarty, on behalf of the City Council, again thanked everyone involved for their hard work on the ordinance. Finance Director Brager reported that, in addition 8. Third Quarter to normal duties, the Finance Department had been Department Head very busy working with the Council on the 1983 Reports budget, and he felt a good job had been done, with the property tax increase being kept to 3.9 while the City is maintaining their central services. Finance Director Brager reported they had assisted the Clerk /Administrator at the counting center for the primary election, and the ballot counter that malfunctioned has been sent out for repair and is due back in time for the general election. Finance Director Brager reported the special assess- ment for Silver Lake Woods has been certified with the County, and two pre- payments have been received. He reported also that they expect to continue work- ing on the budget and elections in the next quarter, and that they have received three proposals for the audit of the 1982 records. Mie Sported also that the word processor will serve as a remote terminal at City Hall to hook up to the Ramsey County computer, and they hope to have the utility programs up by the first of the year, and hope to end 1983 with all systems operational at City Hall. He explained this should reduce some operating costs in data processing, and should make it a much more marketable system. He added they hope to develop a marketing plan to recruit other cities, which would lower the cost for Mounds View. Finance Director Brager reported the City is pretty much on target with the 1982 budget to date. Park Director Anderson reported the third quarter had been very busy for the Rec programs, with the Festival in the Park being a greet success and the opening of the Edgewood Community Resource .:enter on September 15. Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Eight Park Director Anderson reporte the joint powers agree ment with the City of New Brighton had been completed for the puppet wagon program, with a third staff person being added. He also reported that a childrens theater program had been started, with 30 children participating. Park Director Anderson reported the softball program was a huge success, with over 100 teams participating, and they plan on the two additional fields at Silver View Park to help with the crowded schedule, but with the possibility of losing the two fields at Red Oak School. Park Director Anderson reported that Phase I at Silver View Park is almost complete, with the project being approximately $7,000 under budget to date. He also reported they hope the reseeding will take off soon. Park Director Anderson four park shelter buildings were removed, and a new one built at Lambert Park, with three new buildings having been purchased recently. He also reported that the City had saved approxi- mately $16,000 through the use of CETA employees, and they are feeling the benefit of having Larry Decheine working on the park maintenance. He also reported over 900 trees had been planted to date, with 22 being stolen, and 230 trees being removed as of 9/1/82 due to diesease. He added that some trees had been transplanted, and seem to be doing well. Director Johnson reported the street department made three major repairs during the third quarter, and attempted to repair the storm sewer problem, and completed the seal coating. He added that Lift Station #3 had a burned out motor whiLh was repaired, as well as the root treatment control program being completed. Director Johnson reported the I &I field study work was completed, with the report due shortly. He also reported a stolen fire hydrant had been replaced, and the flushing of water mains was completed, with the water being very dark and rusty. He added they had started the servicing and painting program for the fire hydrants, and are 25% complete. Director Johnson reported they are preparing bids for the complete servicing of Well #5, and have completed 192 me. r services and inspections. Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Nine -He also gave a summary of applications processed by the Community Development Department, and reported that they have completed the implementation of the wetlands ordinance and are now working on the flood plain ordinance. Motion /Second: Doty /Blanchard to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 321, amending the municipal code of the City of Mounds View by creating Chapter 49, "Flood Plain Zoning Ordinance and waive the reading of the ordinance, making it available at City Hall for review by residents. 5 ayes 0 nays Attorney Meyers rF ?orted he has read the proposed ordinance and finds there may be some overlap between the flood plain ordinance and wetland ordinance, and gave an example from page 6. Director Johnson responded that the two ordinances were worked in tandem, and while he feels they are consistent, he cannot guarantee it. Motion /Second: McCarty /Doty to authorize Attorney Meyers and Staff to compare Chapters 49 and 48 and report back any inconsistencies. 5 ayes 0 nays Director Johnson was directed to foiward the pro- posed ordinance to the DNR for their review, since their comments must be received before the second reading. It was noted that this item was discussed earlier in the meeting and will be placed on the agenda for discussion at a future agenda session. Park Director Anderson reported they had received the purchase agreement from Ernst Movers, and they are ready to go. He reported the most difficult issue has been trying to locate the buildings at each park, with the final decision of the Park ':ommission being to go with the Master Plan, even ,chough that may not be the most convenient location at each park presently. He reviewed the proposed locations for the Council and stated they would put up maps in each building, showing the Master 9. Approval of First Reading of Ord. No. 321 Amending the Municipal Code of the City of Mounds View by Creating Chapter 49, "Flood Plain Ordinance" Motion Carried Motion Carried 10. Review of Letter to Past Due Utility and Tree Removal Accounts 11. Consideration of Staff Memo Regard- ing Park Shelter Buildings Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Ten Plan so the residents would understand why the build ings were located where they were. He added they will be coming in under budget, and all three build- ings will be ready no later than December 1. There was discussion regarding payment of fees for building permits, and the question was raised who would pay the highway permit fees for moving the buildings. Park Director Anderson was directed to check into those fees, and it was pointed out the Council had not signed the purchase agreement yet, in which those fees are assigned. Motion /Second: Blanchard /Hodges to rescind the fees for the building permits for the three park shelter buildings, but they must still retain the requirements. 5 ayes 0 nays Attorney Meyers stated he would meet with Park Director Anderson and Mr. Ernst on October 13 and work out an understanding on the fees. Park Director Anderson reviewed the recommendation from the Park and Rec Commission, endorsing the progr:.tn in the City. Mayor McCarty stated he was concerned with the City being held liable for any injuries. Park Director Anderson replied that the Golden Gloves sponsors are willing to enter into an agreement with the City to hold them harmless for any liability. Attorney Meyers recommended they should also file a certificate of insurance. Motion /Second: McCarty /Doty to endorse the Golden Gloves boxing program at the Edgewood Community Resources Center, contingent upon receipt of the hold harmless agreement in favor of the City and endorsement upon any insurance Golden Gloves may have in the case of a lawsuit, referring to liability. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion /Second: Blanchard /Forslund to amend the previous motion to include that there will be a six month trial period. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 12. Consideration of Staff Memo Regard- ing Golden Gloves Boxing Program Motion Carried Motion Carried Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Eleven Park Director Anderson explained he would like to take time off, with pay, to attend the National Recreation and Park Association Congress, at his own personal expense, and would require 3 days. Mayor McCarty replied that Staff members are to be granted compensation in time off for the extra hours they put in, and recommended Mr. Anderson use his comp time, and stated no action was required since it was an administrative matter. Motion /Second: McCarty /Blanchard to authorize the City to receive the free fill from the property at 5071 Bona Road. 5 ayes 0 nays Director Johnson reported they have serviced 192 meters and found a high percentage of unaccurate readings. He added a more detailed report would be prepared at the end of the study, but explained the problem area has been identified as a batch of 300 meters, and asked approval to install 50 Rock- well meters from the supply to replace 50 of the erroneous meters, at a cost of approximately $2,250. Motion /Second: McCarty /Blanchard to authorize the reassignment of $2,250 in the Water 700, Material and Supply account, to purchase water meters. 5 ayes 0 nays Director Johnson reported a second bid had been received for the sewer break on County Road H, and the problem appears to be much more expensive than was originally estimated. He noted the low bidder is ready to start immediately upon award of the contract. Motion /Second: McCarty /Forslund to authorize Staff to draw from the SWM fund a maximum of $7,700, of which $6,840 will be paid to Dawson Construction, Inc. for repair of the storm sewer system on County Road 1, east of Bona Road. 5 ayes 0 nays Director Johnson reported that the motor from Lift Station #3 had failed and is being repaire:i, and ,-it was brought to his attention that the equipment may be needing servicing in the future. He added he would have more information for them later. 13. Consideration of Park, Recreation and Forestry, Director. Anderson Request Time Off with Pay to Attend the 1982 National Recrea- l ion and Park Association Cong Motion Carried 14. Report of Direc- tor of Public Works /Community Development Motion Carried Motion Carried Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Twelve ,Director Johnson reported the Long Lake Road ditch repair contract has not been completed yet, with the contractor being very overdue on his completion date, and after speaking with Attorney Meyers, was planning to send a letter to the contractor advising him he is responsible for all costs. Director Johnson reported he had received a letter from Pat Allen at Gunnar Isberg and Associates, clarifying her letter of October 1. He added Ms. Allen would like to attend the October 18 agenda meeting and address the Council. It was agreed that Ms. Allen could meet with the Council on the 18th, but would be limited to 30 minutes, do to the lengthy agenda, and could set an alternate date if she desired more than 30 minutes. Attorney Meyers reported he had received a copy of a memo regarding the airport operators meeting, and he has been asked for his opinion regarding the VASI which is proposed. He explained he is research- ing it with Mr. Kerney, and it does not appear to be allowable, but is checking further with the FAA. Councilmember Forslund reported the Planning Commis- 16. Reports of sion has finished their review on the home occu- Councilmembers pations ordinance and will be forwarding P to the Council shortly, as well. as Chapter 42. Councilmember Blanchard had no report. Councilmember Doty had no report. Councilmember Hodges had no report. Mayor McCarty had no report. Clerk /Administrator Pauley had no report. 17. Report of Administrator Motion /Second: Doty /Blanchard to adjourn the 18. Adjournment meeting at 10:23 PM. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Res_pectfully submifte2i. .,,,i_: Donal. F`. Pauey Clerk /Administrator 15. Report of Attorney