The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes - 1984/07/09CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW July 9, 1984 7:30 p.m. A G E N D A 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call Blanchard, Doty, Hankner, Linke, McCarty 4. Approval of Minutes: June 25, 1984 (Regular Meeting) (previously received in 07/02/84 packet) 5. Public Hearings 7:50 p.m. Rezoning of Red Oak Estates No. 3, Subject to Easements: Lots 1 -74, Block 1 from R1 to R3 6. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor Consideration of Resolution 1765 of Petition for Public Improvements of the Gale /Yost Edition Consideration „If Resolution 1766 of Petition for Public Improvements for the Pinecrest Property CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES First Reading of Ordinance No. 380 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41 Entitled, "Specific Rezonings" 8:30 p.m. Consideration of Petition for Public Improvements of the Gale /Yost Edition including street, sewer, water, storm sewer, curb and gutter and street lighting 8:35 p.m. Consideration of Petition for Public Improvements for the Pinecrest Property including street, sewer, storm sewer, curb and gutter, and street lighting AGENDA July 9, 1984 Page Two 7. Approval of Consent Agenda ITEM A. Approve Resolution No. 1756 Establishing a General Fund Cash Flow Reserve. ITEM B. Approve Resolution No. 1757 Establishing a General Fund Reserve for Compensated Absences Payable. ITEM C. Approve Resolution No. 1758 Establishing a General Fund Reserve for Contingency. ITEM D. Approve Resolution No. 1759 Authorizing a Transfer of Funds from the Park Improvement Fund to the Silver Lake Park Fund and Authorizing Closing of the Silver View Park Fund. ITEM E. Approve Resolution No. 1760 Establishing a Reserve for Debt Service in the 1981 Improvement Bonds Fund. ITEM F. Authorize Placement of Streetlight at the Intersection of Silver Lake Road and County Road I per staff recommendation dated June 20, 1984. ITEM G. Approve Resolution No. 1762 Rescinding Resolution 1464 Establishing Performance Guidelines for Clerk- Administrator. ITEM H. Approve Resolution 1763 Requesting Placement of 4 way stop Intersections on Long Lake Road by Ramsey County. ITEM I. Consideration of Application for Transfer of Povlitzki's Off10 Liquor License from Richard and Marline Povlitzki to Patrick Conroy, Sr. (material was distributed in 06/18/84 packet). ITEM J. Quarterly Department Head Reports: Donald Prager Finance Director Bruce Anderson Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director Tim Ramacher Police Chief Steve Thatcher Public Works /Community Development Director ITEM K. First Reading of Ordinance No. 379 An Ordinance Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 100, Entitled "Intoxicating Liquors ITEM L. Approve Resolution No. 1764 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds ITEM M. Licenses for Approval General Renewal \dvance Construction Company B L Home Improvement W. F. Bauer Construction Company Crowley Company, Inc. Hagar Construction, Inc. Dailey Homes, Inc. Milton Johnson Roofing Sheet Metal Co. AGENDA July 9, 1984 Page Three ITEM M. Licenses for Approval (continued) GENERAL Renewal (continued) P. E. Johnson Sons, Inc. Kraus Anderson Construction Company Lindman Builders Max's Construction Company Sunnyside Builders Sussel Corporation Richard Tkaczik Construction, Inc. Twin City Insulation Twin City Storm Sash Co., Inc. New Bastion Blessing Leier Custom Homes, Inc. Panelcraft, Inc. HEATING AIR CONDITIONING Renewal Air Comfort, Inc. American Burner Service Blaine Heating, Air Cond. Electric Dependable Heating Air Cond., Inc. Englund Heating, Inc. Frank's Heating Air Conditioning Heating Cooling Two J J Heating Sheet Metal, Inc. More's Burner Service Northeast Sheet Metal Pierce Refrigeration Geo. Sedgwick Heating Air Cond. Co. Standard Heating Air Conditioning Suburban Air Conditioning Ray N. Welter Heating Company Yale, Inc. ASPHALT Renewal Darrell's Contracting Asphalt Driveway Company Buck Blacktop, Inc. C S Blacktopping J R Blacktop Lino Lakes Blacktop, Inc. Northern Asphalt Const., Inc. AGENDA July 9, 1984 Page Four M. Licenses for Approval (continued) SEWER WATER Renewal Midwestern Mechanical United Water Sewer Co. Welter Blaylock, Inc. New Burkhardt Plumbing EXCAVATING Renewal Brighton Excavating D. W. Harstad Co., Inc. Waalen Sabby, Inc. Hank Weidema SIGN BILLBOARD Renewal Lawrence Signs, Inc. Naegele Outdoor Advertising of the Twin Cities, Inc. National Advertisin Co. Nordquist Sign Co., Inc. Royal Crown Beverage Co. Suburban Lighting, Inc. Western Outdoor Advertising MASONRY Renewal Buzzell Masonry, Inc. Ed Lutz Const., Inc. Norsk Concrete Const. OTHER Renewal Century Fence Co. Olsen Fire Protection, Inc. Rite Way Waterproofing New The Delory Co. Fence Specialists Gcpher State Fence Co. Wacker Stucco AGENDA July 9, 1984 Page Five 8. Second Reading and Adoption of Municipal Code of Mounds View "Specific Rezonings" 9. Second Reading and Adoption of Municipal Code of Mounds View "Specific Rezoning" 10. Second Reading and Adoption of Municipal Code of Mounds View "Specific Rezonings" 11. Second Reading and Adoption of Municipal Code of Mounds View "Intoxicating Liquors" 15. Report of Administrator 16. Adjournment Ordinance No. 374 Amending the By Amending Chapter 41 Entitled, Ordinance No. 376 Amending the By Amending Chapter 41 Entitled, Ordinance No. 377 Amending the By Amending Chapter 41 Entitled, Ordinance No. 379 Amending the by Amending Chapter 100, Entitled 12. Report of Director of Public Works /Community Development 13. Report of Attorney 14. Report of Councilmembers Blanchard, Doty, Hankner, Linke, and McCarty CONSENT AGENDA July 9, 1984 The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council. The entire agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, an item can be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for debate. ITEM A. Adopt Resolution No. 1756 Establishing a General Fund Cash Flow Reserve ITEM E. Adopt Resolution No. 1757 Establishing a General Fund Reserve for Compensated Absences Payable ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No. 1758 Establishing a General Fund Reserve for Contingency ITEM D. Adopt Resolution No. 1759 Authorizing a Transfer of Funds from the Park Improvement Fund to the Silver Lake Park Fund and Authorizing Closing of the Silver View Park Fund ITEM E. Adopt Resolution No. 1760 Establishing a Reserve for Debt Service in the 1981 Improvement Bonds Fund ITEM F. Authorize Placement of Streetlight at the Intersection of Silver Lake Road and County Road I per staff recommendation dated June 20, 1984 ITEM G. Adopt Resolution No. 1762 Rescinding Resolution 1464 Establishing .Performance Guidelines for Clerk Administrator ITEM H. Adopt Resolution No. 1763 Requesting Placement of 4 way stop Intersections on Long Lake Road by Ramsey County ITEM I. Consideration of Application, for Transfer of Povlitzki's Off 10 Liquor License from Richard and Marline Povlitzki to Patrick Conroy, Sr. ITEM K. First Reading of Ordinance No. 379 An Ordinance Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 100, Entitled "Intoxicating Liquors" ITEM L. Approve Resolution No. 1764 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds ITEM M. Licenses for Approval General \dvance Construction Company B L Home Improvement W. F. Bauer Construction Company Crowley Company, Inc. Hogar Construction, Inc. Dailey Homes, Inc. Milton Johnson Roofing Sheet Metal Co. CONSENT AGENDA •July 9, 1984 Page Two ITEM M. Licenses for Approval (continued) GENERAL Renewal (continued) P. E. Johnson Sons, Inc. Kraus Anderson Construction Company Lindman Builders Max's Construction Company Sunnyside Builders Sussel Corporation Richard Tkaczik Construction, Inc. Twin City Insulation Twin City Storm Sash Co., Inc. New Bastion Blessing Leier Custom Homes, Inc. Panelcraft, Inc. HEATING AIR CONDITIONING Renewal Air Comfort, Inc. American Burner Service Blaine Heating, Air Cond. Electric Dependable Heating Air Cond., Inc. Englund Heating, Inc. Frank's H Air Conditioning Heating Cooling Two J J Heating Sheet Metal, Inc. More's Burner Service Northeast Sheet Metal Pierce Refrigeration Geo. Sedgwick Heating Air Cond. Co. Standard Heating Air Conditioning Suburban Air Conditioning Ray N. Welter Heating Company Yale, Inc. ASPHALT Renewal Darrell's Contracting Asphalt Driveway Company Buck Blacktop, Inc. C S Blacktopping J R Blacktop Lino Lakes Blacktop, Inc. Northern Asphalt Const., Inc. CONSENT AGENDA July 9, 1984 Page Three M. Licenses for Approval (continued) SEWER WATER Renewal Midwestern Mechanical United Water Sewer Co. Welter Blaylock, Inc. New Burkhardt Plumbing EXCAVATING Renewal Brighton Excavating D. W. Harstad Co., Inc. Waalen Sabby, Inc. Hank Weidema SIGN BILLBOARD Renewal Lawrence Signs, Inc. Naegele Outdoor Advertising of the Twin Cities, Inc. National Advertising Co. Nordquist Sign Co., Inc. Royal Crown Beverage Co. Suburban Lighting, Inc. Western Outdoor Advertising MASONRY Renewal Buzzell Masonry, Inc. Ed Lutz Const., Inc. Norsk Concrete Const. OTHER Renewal Century Fence Co. Olsen Fire Protection, Inc. Rite Way Waterproofing New The Delory Co. Fence Specialists Gopher State Fence Co. Wacker Stucco 5 ayes 0 nays PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Blanchard, Doty, Hanker, Linke and Mayor McCarty. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers and Clerk/ Administrator Pauley. Motion /Second: Doty /Blanchard to approve the June 25, 1984 minutes as corrected. Jim Miller requested the Council grant a 90 day extension for the time limit for submitting the final plat on his property. He explained they have been working continuously on the project, but in meeting with Staff and the Council on several items, there are still some unresolved issued, such as the wetlands issue. He stated they were given a 90 day extension on April 9, and are requesting this second extension to get everything together. He also noted that Staff has advised him they are looking at proposed revisions to the wetlands ordinance. Approved: 07 -23 -84 Mayor McCarty questioned what granting another extension would do to the integrity of the ordinance if they extend the time frame. Attorney Meyers advised it is not so much a legal question as it is a political one. He stated the Council could grant an extension if they feel there_ is a good reason for one, or if the applicant can prove the delay was caused by circumstances beyond his control. Regular Meeting July 9, 1984 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order Mayor McCarty at 7:37 PM on July 9, 1984. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Approval of Minutes: June 25, 1984 Motion Carried 5. Residents Re- quests and Comments from the Floor Mounds View City Council July 9, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Two Motion /Second: McCarty /Blanchard to grant a 90 day extension to the Miller Industrial Plat, for sub- mission of the final plat, based upon pending proposed changes to the wetlands ordinance. 5 ayes 0 nays Susan Snoke, 5272 Sunnyside Road, asked if the City would consider putting up signs on property that is up for rezoning, as Fridley and New Brighton do, to help make the residents aware that something is being considered for rezoning. Motion /Second: McCarty /Blanchard to direct Staff to post proposed rezoning notices on City property in the future. 5 ayes 0 nays There was discussion on the motion before the vote was taken. Attorney Meyers advised that the City had done that at one time, many years ago. Councilmember Linke questioned where the funds would come from to pay for the signs. Councilmember Hankner stated she felt the issue should be researched first, and then a motion made, once the cost was known, and the source of the funds. Councilmember Doty stated the funds could come from the contingency fund. Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened the first public hearing at 7:50 PM. Clerk /Administra :or Pauley advised this was a continued hearing from the one that was held in May. He reported the Planning Commission had held an informational meeting with the residents, and has made the recommendation to the Council that the area in question not be rezoned but left as is. He added that Harstad and Todd had appeared at City Hall and applied for a building permit for 6 unit townhouses, but they were advised that building permits would not be issued at this time, as fees could not be calculated, and they must go through a development review with the Planning Commission and City Council, as well as the land in question being involved with the wetland ordinance and floodplain ordinance. Staff also advised Mr. Harstad that he would have to file an application with the City for a conditional use permit, as well as wetlands and floodplain permits. Motion Carried Motion Carried 6A. Public Hearing Rezoning of Red Oak Estates No. 3 Mounds View City Council July 9, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Three ,Mike Barner, 2609 Clearview, stated he is in agree- ment with the Planning Commission's recommendation to leave the zoning as is. He stated his property is across the street from the property in question, and he did not receive a notice of the hearing, and many of his neighbors did not receive one either. He explained he has lived in his home since 1976, and purchased it because it was in a single family area, with very light traffic. Mr. Barner stated there are a substantial number of children in the neighborhood now, and he would not want to see an increase in traffic. He also questioned how the 6 plex was allowed in the first place. Mayor McCarty explained the existing 6 piex was built in 1974, on the basis that no further permits would be issued until the drainage issue was taken care of. Attorney Meyers explained the history of the property, and how the City had been taken to court, and the court's decision on the property. He stated that the proposal this evening is to bring the zoning into conformance with the comprehensive plan, and if the Council does not rezone the property, they should amend the comprehensive plan to go back to low density. Elaine Sherhard, 2658 County Road H2, stated she lives in one of the townhouse units, and questioned if the zoning were approved, if she would then become an R -3. She added she does not want to be R -3, and has had many problems since she purchased her townhome. Mayor McCarty explained the comprehensive plan for that area for District 9 is low density, which would be R -1 or R -2. Mayor McCarty also explained a memo from Staff from February 1984 had laid out the criteria that would be used in rezoning property and bringing into con- formance with the comprehensive plan. Ken Briggs stated he was a representative of Mr. Harstad and Mr. Todd, and asked why they were never notified in advance that the property was being discussed for rezoning. He stated they have not had time to prepare themselves to address the Council or residents about the proposed re- zoning, and asked that it be referred back to the Planning Commission so they would have a chance to meet with them and discuss it. Clerk /Administrator Pauley explained that notice was published in the New Brighton Bulletin, and they followed the letter of the law in providing notification. Mounds View City Council July 9, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Four Councilmember Doty stated that Lhe issue of the rezoning appears to be an error on the part of the Planning Commission, in bringing it forward at all, and it should be left R -1. Attorney Meyers advised that under R -3, a conditional use permit could allow townhouses up to 6 units, which is the issue the Planning Commission is addressing. He also explained that for a comprehensive rezoning, official notification is by the newspaper. Councilmember Hankner asked that Staff research the problem of notices not being received by everyone for hey.. sgs such as this, as the problem has occurrea before. Mayor McCarty stated the Council is sensitive to the issue now, and will address it further. The following residents stated their desire to have the property remain R -1: Julian Sprunck, 2649 Louisa; Bruce Ewing, 2613 Clearview; Jerry Hildebrant, 2528 Ridge Lane; Elaine Shephard, 2658 County Road H2; Tom Rowley, 2562 Ridge Lane; Judy Rowley, 2562 Ridge Lane; Denise Seeman, 2606 Clearview; Arlene Perkins, 2559 Wooddale; Donna Wickland, 5206 Long Lake Road; Charlie Franzen, 5279 Sunnyside Road; Mildred Sprunck, 2649 Louisa; David McGinn, 2646 Clearview; Robert Ford, 2641 Clearview; Carole Ford, 2641 Clearview; Frank Sweeney,5267 Sunnyside Road; Pam Sweeney, 5267 Sunnyside Road; Gail Martinez, 5144 Long Lake Road; Gary Cox, 5249 Sunnyside Road; Joe Weaver, 2613 Louisa; Tonya Cox, 5249 Sunnyside Road; Steve Miller, 2614 Clearview Avenue; Frank Lehner, 2650 Clearview; Sally Peters, 2629 Clearview; LaMona Weaver, 2613 Louisa; Ron Velander, 5231 Skiba Drive; Susan Snoke, 5272 Sunnyside;Dick Snoke, 5272 Sunnyside; Linda Jessen, 5278 Sunnyside; Barb Watkins, 2609 Louisa; Barb Pitzel, 2617 Louisa; Dave Pitzel, 2617 Louisa; Ken Kiefer, 5224 Sunnyside; Dennis Peterson, 2621 Louisa; Ron Nessett, 5115 Long Lake Road. Ms. Snoke presented the Council with a petition of 153 signatures, requesting the property not be rezoned. Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:19 PM. Motion /Second: Doty /Linke to deny the rezoning of Red Oak Estates No. 3, from R -1 to R -3. 5 ayes 0 nays Cuuncilmember Doty stated that considering all the information that has been received from the residents, Motion Carried Mounds View City Council July 9, 1984 Regular Meeting Page ri and the past circumstances involing the development of the property, and feeling that the street is a sufficient buffer for that area, it is more suitable for R -1 or R -2. Attorney Meyers noted the residents had relied on the fact that the development was R -1 to the north of them, and there could be a depreciation in the value of their homes if the property was rezoned, and health, safety and welfare must be considered, along with the drainage concerns. Steve Miller stated he had spoken with two realtors, and was told he could expect a 10 -15% loss in the value of his home if the land was rezoned. Dave Thisle stated there is a water problem already, which R -3 development would compound. Gary Cox stated he was concerned with the appearance of the neighborhood, as he lives directly next to the existing townhouse units, and he did not want to be sandwiched in between: multiple units. Mayor McCarty noted that if the property were rezoned to R -3, a conditional use permit would be needed for a townhouse development, and this particular develop- ment did not meet all the criteria necessary. Motion /Second: Blanchard /Linke to call for the question. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty asked that consent agenda Item I be- come regular agenda item 7A, and Item J become regular agenda item 7B, and Item K be removed, and restate Item 11 of the regular agenda as the first reading of Ordinance No. 379, and reletter Item L to Item I, and reletter Item M to Item J. Councilmember Blanchard asked that Item H be removed. Motion /Second: Doty /Hankner to approve the con- sent agenda, as amended, and waive the reading of the resolutions. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion /Second: Blanchard /Linke to table Item H. 5 ayes 0 nays Bill Fritz, 3072 Long Lake Road, stated he was in 7. Approval of Consent Agenda Motion Carried Motion Carried Mounds View City Council July 9, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Six favor of tabling the item, as he does not feel the stop signs are needed. Councilmember Blanchard stated she would like a traffic count done of the area. Mayor McCarty stated he would rather deny the placement of the stop -sign, and have the Police Department take action against the speeders. Councilmember }iankner stated she was in favor of tabling, as there are still a number of things to be checked out. Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened the next public hearing at 8:44 PM. Clerk /Administrator Pauley reviewed the changes to proposed Resolution No. 1766. Mayor McCarty asked if the City would be liable if an error was made in designing the project. Clerk/ Administrator Pauley replied the City does have insurance coverage. The Council discussed the merits of getting involved in something of this nature. Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing at 8:48 PM and reopened the regular meeting. Motion /Second: Linke /Doty to approve Resolution No. 1766 and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened the next public hearing at 8 :50 PM. Motion /Second: McCarty /Doty to approve Resolution No. 1765 and waive the reading, with the following amendment, that in the final be it further resolved. that the security approved by the City be in an amount equal to five years payment of the assess- ments, rather than 3 years, and add another be it further resolved, with the City having the option to reduce the security by 20% for the taxes and assessments, as the work is completed. 5 ayes 0 nays The representative for Mr. Beim stated he would discuss the motion with Mr. Beim, and they would be meeting with Mr. Rose and Mr. Thatcher on July 11. 6B. Consideration o Petition for Public Improve- ments for Gale/ Yost Addn. Motion Carried 6C. Public Hearing Consideration of Improvements for Pinecrest Pro- perties Motion Carried Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:55 PM. Councilntember Doty stated that in the past, the City has had references available for the Council to review in a liquor license transfer. Mayor McCarty asked if an official application has been received on the proper form. Clerk /Administrator Pauley replied one had, but references are not re- quired on the form. He added that once in the past has the Council requested references. Motion: Doty to table until references are received concerning all involved in the request for the liquor license transfer. The motion failed for lack of a second. Clerk /Administrator Pauley stated that based on information received from Police Chief Ramacher, he feels a check would be favorable. Motion /Second: McCarty /Doty to deny the liquor license transfer request on the basis of the report from the Police Chief, dated June 18, 1984 and subsequent reports from the St. Paul Police Dept. 2 ayes 3 nays Councilmembers Linke, Blanchard and Hankner voted against the motion. Motion /Second: Hankner /Linke to approve the transfer of the liquor license for Povlitzki's Off 10 from Richard and Marline Povlitzki to Patrick Conroy, Sr. 3 ayes 2 nays Mayor McCarty and Coincilmember Doty voted against the motion. Finance Director Brager reviewed the previous quarter for the Finance Department, reporting they had finish- ed work on the City audit, and got the financial statements out, and have begun work on the 1985 budget, and should have the preliminary draft to the Council at the next agenda ses,ion. He reported all depart- ments are within budget so far for the year, and the expected revenues '.ave been realized. He also report- ed the Finance Department will be assisting in the elections in the Fall. July 9, 1984 Page Seven 7A, Consideration p,f Application for Povlitzki's Off 10 Liquor License Failed Motion Failed Motion Carried 7B. Quarterly Department Head Reports Mounds View City Council July 9, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Eight Park Director Anderson reported they have experienced the largest summer recreation program in the past six years, as well as the Festival in the Park being very successful, with preliminary indications being that they will come in under budget, as well as generate income. Park Director Anderson reported he will be presenting an in -depth report on the aquatics program within the next few weeks, and he stated it is going very well. He also reported the healthy people program is going very well, and they have had two health fairs, attended by approximately 800 people. Park Director Anderson reported they have submitted a preliminary grant for Greenfield Park, and he will keep the Council up to date on that progress. He reported the new tot lot equipment has arrived and will be installed within the next two weeks. Park Director Anderson reported they have had juris- diction over the park maintenance people for the past ten weeks, and have gone to double shifts, which has worked well. The winter injury has claimed about 160 trees in just the past three weeks. Park Director Anderson also reported they have been talking with the School Board regarding the Red Oak School property, and will keep the Council advised. Police Chief Ramacher reviewed the training sessions he and the officers have attended, and reviewed the illness problems they have experienced in the past few months. He reported the Community Services Officer is out on a leave of absense until the first of the year. Police Chief Ramacher reported the system of rotating investigators is nearly complete. In comparing the first six months of 1984 to 1983, the crime rate has dropped slightly, and 20% more traffic citations have been issued, and 30% more arrests have been made, with a 10% increase in calls, while having one less officer than last year. Councilmember Hankner commented she liked the report the Council had received earlier from Police Chief Ramacher. She also asked that Staff look into publishing police calls in the newspaper. Councilmember Doty asked that Long Lake Road and County Road J be checked for speeders. Police Chief Ramacher replied Long Lake Road has always been a problem, and he feels the solution is a 'i -way stop sign, and radar would not solve the problem. Mounds View City Council July 9, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Nine Clerk /Administrator Pauley advised that Police Chief Ramacher has recommended the squad car that is presently going out of service be made an unmarked squad car, which could be used by City Staff during the day, and the Police Department at night, which would be good utilization of the vehicle. Motion /Second: McCarty /Hankner to have the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 374, amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 41, and waive the reading. Ccuncilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Mayor McCarty Blanchard aye Doty aye Hankner aye Linke aye aye Motion /Second: Doty /Blanchard to have the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 376, amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 41, and waive the reading. Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Mayor McCarty Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Mayor McCarty Blanchard aye Doty aye Hankner aye Linke aye aye Motion /Second: Blanchard /Linke to have the second 10. Second Reading reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 377, amending and Adoption of the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Ordinance No. 377 Chapter 41, and waive the reading. Blanchard aye Doty aye Hankner aye Linke aye aye 8. 2nd Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 374 Motion Carried 9. 2nd Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 376 Carried Motion Carried Motion /Second: Hankner /Blanchard to have the first 11. 1st Reading of reading of Ordinance No. 379, amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 100, and waive the reading. 5 dyes s 0 nays �S Motion Carried Ordinance No. 379 Attorney Meyers advised the Council they will ulti- 12. Report of mately have to make a decision on the townhouses Attorney in the R -1 zoning in the Red Oak Estates. The Council directed Attorney Meyers to research what Mounds View City Council July 9, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Ton action the Council and Planning Commission could take. Attorney Meyers reported he had been in communication with Transplan, Inc., and expects a brief from them soon. Councilmember Blanchard noted the Festival in the 13. Reports of Park was a great success this year. Councilmembers Councilmember Doty reported he had been unable to attend the Park and Rec Commission meeting last week. He added he was also very impressed with the Festival in the Park. Councilmember Doty asked that the Grant Merritt bill be on the agenda for the next meeting. Councilmember Hankner stated she felt an amendment to the intoxicating liquor ordinance would be very beneficial to the City. Councilmember Hankner reported she had spoken with Jan Quick, and the preliminary figures from the Festival in the Park look like they did make some money. The Commission will be meeting July 10 to review the figures. Councilmember Hanker stated she felt the Festival Commission members should be recognized individually for the hard work they did. Motion /Second: Hankner /Blanchard to have a resolu- tion of appreciation given to each Festivities Commission member. 5 ayes 0 nays Councilmember Linke had no report. Mayor McCarty asked when the Povlitzki license issue was last discussed, and asked that the Council have some type of review if it is going to be awhile between discussions. Motion Carried Clerk /Administrator Pauley reported that effective 14. Report of July 1, City Staff implemented a new call -out Clerk/Administra- policy, which eliminates having to carry the for beeper. Clerk /Administrator Pauley reported there is a new copy machine at City Hall from Savin, while he has attempted to negotiate an opt -out with chem. Motion/Second: Linke/Doty to adjourn the meeting 15. Adjournment at 9:40 PM. Mounds View City Council July 9, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Eleven 5 ayes 0 nays tfully su "tted, Donald/F. aule Clerk/Administr Motion Carried ck 'an iWLL 75ku 5co c E rc EAL 51 laun 26( -3 7 5,26 k, 3 o?5- ,26 Ca?e #"g e_.// h e t3-272 1 (ad alcro-0(6..,J 41-c &m Rac2,066ekti ffikg cfr el /tt We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to b changed from R-1 to R-3 on the property along the south side of County Road H between Sunnyside Road and Long Lake Road, as well as the prop9rty bounded by Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and County Road H (Red Oak Estates "No. 3, Subi to esMt; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Block 1, attributable to the following: 1-521 and 59-721) and (Red Oak Estates, Lot.]., Block 1) We believe the building of multiple housing would change the charactor of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the k.Comprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in non-compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. NAME (Sign and Print) ADDRESS PHONE 1. 4. ,/.3--ee./-1-..-.--- -.5 ;7 -3c.' -51,..,-), d,.... /2.-C 78V-- 51 sr .5T z ■.)(4_0( .2 Z L zt_c,___. 7KC C-/ /5C 2 674'7 C4- 1); f 7R L- 511si 7 1 4( Cc-3 7 -APJ; I W.F. cLi .4-2. 'Lt 7 P 7. (-,/,2 k 60. Pft inta:Ita/ti C v-k_ 7(q/--J,41?7,2_ We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to b9 changed from R-1 to R-3 on the property along the south side of County Road 1F between Sunnyside Road and Long Lake Road, as well as the propgrty bounded by Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and County Road H (Red Oak Estates 'No. 3, Subj to east; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Block 1, attributable to the following: 1-521 and 59 and (Red Oak Estates, Lotll, Block 1). We believe the building of multiple housin w ould change the character of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the uComprehensive pl The existing townhouse is out of place and in non-compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wiOh to compound that error. Ail NAME (Si:..411! Print) ,7f- 10. )-5—e—d; 3. 3 rre?' (1/ 1 0 ADDRESS h 15,Z (3 6 c I 6. 5 7 7 7,- C.. 7 7./ ...--/.41-4...-,______. -6 -C 9. d ir 07 C V 0 We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to b changed from R-1 to R-3 on the property along the south aide of County Road H' between Sunnyside Road and Long Lake Road, as well as the propgrty bounded by Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane Greenwood Drivel and County Road Ir Red O a ea No. 3, Subj to eset; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Block 1, attributable to the following: 1-521 and 59-721) and (Red Oak Estates, Block 1). We believe the building of multiple housing would change the charactor of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the apirit and intent of the Comprehensive Flan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in non-compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. NAME (Sign and Print) ADDRESS 1,77 1: 4 d//2 kd 7fo 030? /4„4.- „:24.06 -h/ ev f`ft 7044 ALZadLLLszt= '7 V 1 ?U) r r 7 7 PHONE (71 7 We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to b changed from R -1 to R -3 on the property along the south aide of County Road H` between Sunnyside Road and Long Lake Road, as well as the propPegrty bounded by Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and County Road H (Red Oak Estates C �D 'No. 3, Subj to esat; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Block 1, attributable to the following: 1 -521 and 59 -721) and (Red Oak Estates, Lotil, Block 1). We believe the building of multiple housing would change the charactor of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ;.Comprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in non- compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. NAME :r Sian and Print) ADDRESS PHONE 4 0 .1i v'E 'l 5 2 -6 SCJA- (7:11F-1( 756 57 7 WWI mar rJ cart 4. 3. 7 7 h 1 2 4, •r:ra iy! 8. n l {,i44t. CCI.. PC i t 7, (c 9s39 1 g(: -.cit 73 .v G/ 7 5 f S'q /y We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to b changed from R -1 to R -3 on the property along the south aide of County Road H` between Sunnyside Road and Long Lake Road, as well as the proppegrty bounded by \Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and County Road H' (Red Oak Estates »No. 3, Subj to eset; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Block 1, attributable to the following: 1 -521 and 59 -721) and (Red Oak Estates, Lotil, Block 1). We believe the building of multiple housing would change the charactor of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse 1s out of place and in son compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. NAME n an i ADDRESS A 141/ 6 1 S,axlp,ct S..i 1.1\1 Sled 1 A sa S(111 fl ys« V e 52:7 s�.;� <_7 s., KO. 5.273 :,,,w�,. net 7� 4 1303 7st e, L S v-10 kC yc �.2 �.7LG� r_ 7 U jj 7e d ;?.g D O v 2.. L .5noKc_ V .J PHONE 764 7)3 6 lo. 44 1)&424 Sell. 7 rs l� 2 7S Pa i/ Xr ,sir f0Zr We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to b changed from R-1 to R-3 on the property along the eouth side of County Road r between Sannyside Road and Long Lake Road, as well as the propgrty bounded by 0 ")Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and County Road r (Red Oak Estates Alo. 3, Subj to es; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Block 1, attributable to the following: 1-521 and 59 and (Red Oak Estates, Lotil, Block 1). We believe the building of multiple housing would change the charactor of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the (Comprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in non-compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. 3. la 65 c-c 8. )W) k,e7'4: P/ 37:1-q/qf ADDRESS a 7/7 714 3 7' y-4f' ze6 7),Y-7nc -602/ We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to bs changed from R-1 to R-3 on the property along the south aide of County Road H' between Sunnyside Road and-Long Lake Road, as well as the propsrty bounded by )Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and County Road H (Red Oak Estates No. 3, Subj to emit; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Block 1, attributable to the following: 1-521 and 59-721) and (Red Oak Estates, LotIl Block 1). We believe the building of multiple housing would change the charactor of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the atomprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in non-compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. NAMt (Sign and Print) 1. X2.-e; 6 >usan j .k cr A-eiz_ 4. (..4 5. /U'l-Ar:.4 kieN.4 6. 77..;:re I" /2. 8. N& Pt., N Cf /1 ,le•f9 A +6 t L xo- ADDRESS /1" PRONE LoaLs& Avc•• ito—c23s T cc,1•41 A19(.11 it 4v. 7 YO c' 0 L c.A.A e_ 7E'D k.k (t .7 1 2 e. 4 9. ;ece .,4,90/5.A .fivz 9sY- t.-t We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to b changed from R-1 to R-3 on the property along the south side of County Road H' between Sunnyside Road_and Long Lake Road, as well as the propsrty bounded by e \Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and County Road H (Red Oak Estates 'No. 3, Subj to esst; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Block 1, attributable to the following: 1-521 and 59-721) and (Red Oak Estates, Lotal, Block 1). We believe the building of Multiple housing would change the charactor of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Momprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in non-compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. NAME (Sign and Print) ADDRESS 1. /0;le „Lce,t,46,- v., C. 5 cVOIC T A9/1/1C'S Li' 0 4k A) L I. ha ir‘r fS 1)1 L tv Lt' 1-1, A/c' 1 o Q v4.4I 4.4.-ct.L.0_,,, (L.A. S 5/..i /7/ .t 1,4 ((L( f U 6 J 1) Y,Vt 6267 krx c: 7./ /c A__NJA6,44 A;c:71/ 74 4 1 —PAU P, 9. 7 It-et ,0 .1 /EL 2 PHONE 736-3679 7X- 31 10 -0 •‘-kz) SX t We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to b changed from R -1 to R -3 on the property along the south side of County Road H between Sunnyside Road and Long Lake Road, as well as the propPegrty bounded by y.Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and County Road H` (Red Oak Estates ,'No. 3, Subj to esmt; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Block 1, attributable to the following: 1 -521 and 59 -721) and (Red Oak Estates, Lot11, Block 1). We believe the building of multiple housing would change the charactor of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the iDomprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse -is out of place and in non compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. NAME (Sign and Print) f., ADDRESS PHONE l TIC ,us A 7` 10. 1. .k-ak C R 2. /27-0 ,a Q c '/l ie 4 A.2, 4.1.-c 9.(i _,,,mil 1 j JC” /i 1� 11^ 71'1 1 V` 6.. /14.6_,.._, A 8 r h G >v 1%1 -5 1 1 v<< ,4,t a r't, o f i• P I Kt) lit. 1 7. -1/l�"2r- s.-n_c C L> 13a r ra. J. F C 1021 rn'+ (1 8 ,/teilk 1 i RED 'Aft Jn/` 1 t 7 8 J 1 0 3 1 6 `fJ T We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to b changed from R -1 to R -3 on the property along the south side of County Road H` between Sunnyside Road and Long Lake Road, as well as the property bounded by Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and County Road it (Red Oak Estates 3, Subj to esmt; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Block 1, attributable to the following: 1 -521 and 59 -721) and (Red Oak Estates, Lotll, Block 1). We believe the building of multiple housing would change the charactor of our „neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the .Comprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in non compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. NAME (S' n and Print) ADDRESS PHONE 1. a ilt �2 G Ci Qa c i o/ e $3 9.4 ;,1 F hi c-6 2. p wifrm .)a sketh) J .114 J 3. On/,,/ 7,6-/I04 rin I ti s/ e- to lJ Sf Cf t...r M iA fsr9i t 5 /64/6 /ri i'd Z9' 7q 7/ 2 (1;tip L 7 �25tp ;TA .may/ 7 L t v 4</31 We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to bs changed from R-1 to R-3 on the property along the south side of County Road H' between Sunnyside Road and Long_Lake Road, as well as the propsrty bounded 1 Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and County Road H (Red Oak Estates No. 3, Subj to east; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Block 1, attributable to the following: 1-521 and 59-721) and (Red Oak Estates, Lotll, Block 1). We believe the building of multiple housing would change the charactor of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the apirit.and intent of the Geomprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in non-compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. NAME (Si and Print ADDRESS PHONE -4 0firIMINOLIP s E. S c EP1S1 S4. OZ.59 Lo 6Q wz_sck Le ,2 6,0c cA)expcOde_ c L. 7N-6,Q 5 C A 4 6 3. (C' 9 e2s c L25. CL I 1 INN WOZ i s Lli 4=7 /9 ii 8 L 1 0., 67% 174 dehi/n 9. RevseTA' 7 (7 -Li -"C /2 dsc( c-ogAL a1. 5(03 Dv, ,do615 JdtJ NAM (Si :n` and Pr t) We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to bs changed from R -1 to R -3 on the property along the south side of County Road H7 between Sunnyside Road and Long Lake Road, ae well as the ProP9rtY bounded by Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and County Road H (Red Oak Estates 'No. 3, Gobi to east; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Block ,1, attributable to the following: 1 -521 and 59 -721) and (Red Oak Estates, Lot1,'' Block ,1). We believe the building of multiple housing would change the of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the CEomprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in non compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. i _57.9,)-664",444( ,OP9 49.717(` 4)k, y'r 5j 1z/ ,-1;5 /g l )5a. 7gl -9Syy el/ 5. fa SIGs ,Ya.4 1 7 "36gc FRick NS6 ('A/ /z D /7 7 74.5 4 8. /p-fA 9.� i f l �wfr /J7F C 1 ,A1,?1. t IT'S 10 1 ADDRESS PHONE 5 /3d? ?e'6 We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to b changed from R-1 to R-3 ou the property along the south side of County Road B between Sunnyside Road and Long Lake Read, as well as the propgrty bounded by Long Lake Road e Ridg Lane, Greenwood Drive and C Road H (Red Oak Estates 41410 3, Subj tossmt;coason area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Bionic 1, attributabl to thffll the 1- and 59-721) and, (Red Oak Estates, Lotll Block 1) believe e building of multiple housing would change the characto; vale of o c e neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and. intent of the prehensire Plan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in non-compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wiSh to compound that error. NAME (Sign and Print) 1 L f\o f\C—Al s, e 7. 8. 9. 10. ADDRESS PHONE nef- g-5 C6a,ft-1 44- 7,9ePri7 „Vet/Li C „(0,a/7,711 Cox- WV 93.0 (Awr.,, at je_p_ruie,,A) ,10 We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to b changed from R -1 to R on the property along the south side of County Road R between Sunnyside Road and Long Lake Road, as well as the propPegrty bounded by L ong L Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and_. County Road H` "(Red'Oak' Estat No. 3i SubJto east; common 'area' interest in Lot: 73 and 74' ,Block 1, attributable to the following: 1 -521 and 59 -721) and (Red Oak, Estates, Lot'l, Block 1) We believe the building of multiple housing would change the charactor of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the .Comprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in non compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. n 'a Print l c /,f 7 NAME 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ADDRESS 0 S r v u /s FAG:.. 26.o PHONE 7 c )9 Al eCe Av-e 3,e -5-777 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City Council will meet on Monday, July 9, 1984 at 7 p.m. at Mounds View City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112 to consider the rezoning from R -1, Single Family Residential to R -3, Medium Density Residen tial, for the property located at the southwest corner of Long Lake Road and County Road H -2, legally known as: RED OAK ESTATES NO. 3,SUBJ TO ESMT; LOTS 1 THRU 74, BLOCK 1 Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter may be heard at this meeting. (Bulletin: June 27, 1984) CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Donald F. Pauley Clerk- Administrator 1 3 J-1 niyvv 0, P dak I 4 P R-1 to le--3 R t 1 c 1* n -,h, doL„. J 0 1 5 3 P v.) 7 S /7 5' We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to 1 changed from R-1 p! to R-3 on the property along the south aide of County Road 1 between Sunnyside Road and Long Lake Road, as well as the Pror bounded by 001116'Long Lake Road Ridge Lane Greenwood Drive and County Road (Red Oak Estates 3", Subj to eselt; common area interest in Lot 73 and 7 Block 1 ip attributable to the following: 1- and 59-7 and (Red Oak Estates, LotIlli Block 1). We b e l ieve t he bui mu I F' e h ousing would change the oharactor of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the aComprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in coo -comPliance with the zoning code; and we don't wiah to compound that error. NAME (Si :n and Prin 3. /A 789- .==r 57 2 .4.16- d ifitkat 4ta2106 Z6( 1.ti /44- (7.) 5. co- 8. 9. 1 0. ADDRESS Cteao, rf 63,a PHONE c7Z0 fdr—r i i 'F'1= 1 72 7es6-945—& /Oct —7_5‹V 7t 4 We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to bg changed from R-1 to R-3 on the property along the south side of County Road H` between Sunnyside Road and Long Lake Road, as well as the propgrty bounded by Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and County Road H" (Red Oak Estates No. 3, Subj to eat; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74, Block 1, attributable to the following: 1-521 and 59-721) and (Red Oak Estates, Lot11, Block 1). We believe the building of multiple housing would change the charactor of our neighborhood, and is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the aomprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in non-compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. NAME (Sign and Print) ADDRESS /971/y/ r-Vr 1. 2. 1.140.4' Zttia ■-ts. 3 c y- 6 rrt 1 i t/Z(61A a— 6-/ 10. A r=2.- if a #p.l. ;e&,7,/ eic•c: A 77)— LL_ ay:, Cir-ey 7,S•7 05 of e-zj 7g/o CA2et LZ 7 R ex" r Rq--( 0 7 5L/ L I A N. IL- 4.r; PHONE 7 Sts 7,1 I We, the undersigned residents of Moundsview, do not wish the zoning to b; changed from R-1 to R-3 on the property along the south side of County Road H' between Sunnyside Road and Long Lake Road, as well as the prop2rty bounded by Long Lake Road, Ridge Lane, Greenwood Drive, and County Road H (Red Oak Estates No. 3, Subj to estat; common area interest in Lot 73 and 74. Block 1, attributable to the following: 1-521 and 59 and (Red Oak Estates, Lot11, Block 1). We believe the building of multiple housing would change the char e e t°r of our ne and is no t i k eep i ng w ith the spirit and intent of the .Comprehensive Plan. The existing townhouse is out of place and in non-compliance with the zoning code; and we don't wish to compound that error. NAME (Sign and Print) ADDRESS PHONE dtri /71 /4/7 1. u 7. 4 4 LC 'V. L s-7 14 Th e lfe 5 11- ri e K we 4 2C0 5'1 062/22 e 7 n. i (Crn.s.s ML1 a c rf) s e-SP: n9-1-ellte4 getn-A A4 t=t-Inar. ZAJ. BAPAick.. 261 eo4 f I 5 573 3 7 e-Ce_d 'co 3Ts 7cierPi‘g., fc7 iea it) Ale 7g( -45 2 7 7 C-62althf_ aUG 72 e/e f £24. 7f Mr. Donald Pauley Clerk Administrator City of Mounds View 2401 Hwy 10 Moundsview, Mn. 55112 Dear Mr. Pauley I am sending you a petition signed by five of the six owners of the six -unit townhouse, as suggested by Mayor Duane McCarty. One owner does not homestead and remains anonymous. This 6-unit townhouse is on Red Oak Estates No.3, Subj to Esmt; Lots 1 thru 74, Block 1 This 6 -unit townhouse was built by Harstad -Todd Construction Co. In view of the recent controversy concerning rezoning, we would like this petition kept on file with the City of Mounds View. Thank you, ElaineShephe d 2658 County Rd. H2 Mounds View, Mn. 55112 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS, RESIDING IN: RED OAK ESTATES NO. 3,SUBJ TO ESMT; LOTS 1 THRU 74, BLOCK 1 PETITION TO KEEP THE ZONING OF OUR PROPERTY AS R -1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. )27. s 0—f7.%Yci -7 t F/ Lj ftZ f 1_ /A DATED JULY 10, 1984 Mayor and City Council City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Re: Petition of Mounds View Mobile Home Park Residents Mayor and City Council: Enclosed is a Petition which has been circulated and signed by the residents of the Mounds View Mobile Home Park regarding the entrance /exit to the mobile home park at Raymond Avenue and Belle Lane. Please give this Petition your consideration and schedule this matter on your agenda at the earliest possible time. Thank you. Respectfully, THE RESIDENTS OF MOUNDS VIEW MOBILE HOME PARK April 5, 1984 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: We, the Residents of Mounds View Mobile Home Park "Residents hereby petition the City of Mounds View ("City") for the permanent opening of the access road to the Mounds View Mobile Home Park "Park at the corner of Belle Lane and Raymond Avenue "Entrance It is our understanding that the complaint which necessitated the closing of the Entrance stems from an increase in traffic on Belle Lane and Raymond Avenue. We fail to understand why we, as Minnesota taxpayers, would be denied access to a public road. Because the traffic backs up on 35W, would we also be denied access to it? Do one or more individuals living on either side of a roadway have any interest in it? We feel part of the problem involved here is the fact that we are mobile home owners not real home owners. Possibly some individuals mistakenly believe that we do not pay property taxes. Besides the property taxes we pay on our mobile homes, we also pay a proportionate share of property taxes through our rental of our lot from the Park. Indeed, those individuals living on Belle Lane and Raymond Avenue probably pay less than the combined property taxes of the 153 Residents of the Park. It is our belief that we should not be discriminated against as to the use of Belle Lane and Raymond Avenue. The Residents state the following additional reasons: 1. At present, there is one entrance /exit to the approximately 10 acre Park housing 153 mobile homes. P. Fire emergencies have a high priority to mobile home owners. The estimated 15 minutes in which a mobile home can burn makes access to the mobile home very important. Emergency vehicles often block the one exit which means the other Residents are trapped in the Park. 3. Minnesota summer storms can come up very rapidly. When these storms occur, most Residents leave their homes. In a weather emergency, there is the possibility again that the one exit would be blocked either by traffic, an overturned home, debris, etc. 4. Our elementary children are not provided bus service and utilize the Entrance to go to and from school. With backpacks and /or band instruments it is very difficult to squeeze through the Entrance. 5. Also individuals walking to bus stops, attending neighborhood functions, shopping at neighborhood stores, etc. are greatly inconvenienced by the closing of this Entrance. Please give the above your consideration. Resident /4l 44-c. Address Li ZLL t /t4 Lit? 7 A.0. -'1., .tt, 4-7, I-, r,fr" ii-ii tvcet d er4 1 s4 f IeYet 114 Address Xki Sda 7- k 19 A B1201 90 a 3 24 (23 J U /ir7. 7 cr 4 c..4 40 0 i ii L. iziLL L/0 1 1 L I' 0 6 l_c4) OAP (7-L) /JQe S t` i i-j6 ./264 ?Le /c rWiffeaf, -17/e e•.: ICC5 4,--ca---d2( A WA i t law° .4oF ,stia five_ 1 I 7 tj.ed z g /1 I I T_YA:t/t) A, 1 LO t2 j03/ 7224)a--(vi4 i'(133 ,7z'I 0 0 3 7 to r /0? fl7n2 //ec kg9 Lc. -2ke_ „Arc 3 0 4 ,--10 36 0-4 dlkr Resident /e'Ai CP1f6— Address /0/3 No wizt ct, te" ,4'6. 4 6 `;3` t-c/".? /4J-427_drto er) 3 0/ 5 0,14e.,01-4.._ i 7 (x4,-t-L A-6-e- id .44/44-lafiscs-d 3 q 7 c /7,2 26,;25 t c A s._)---(0-i=c.«.3 I 0 Lc- AI 4 1.4 Al LAl S 41.41•11 eir I/ Resident 7. 77(4. )//1 W) j pc.in L /94 '1/41 f (24 4ee (r &cril l‘rl //4 1 fi eL /Ut cA 5 Address 1271V? iruib Of Sttrc stri A no,. 40 4 1 2 0 '3 J 'e), ,2 30? Cggit.0 1 ,3 CA..4 Zc V 5-t/z444 /2//i /0 /0 /e.Y3 1 p70 rto-r0 r e- 5 7 "91 .2 k 161' /(1 J: /Ct 7 or t c7 Resident -pa,„ Lo_J- elr a r AfP 1/ Address L1 VC' t.:.l !,c. a. V S S I I a- /C2 ZO'/O -4a tad f a izf i io /(o ss er-, C L rn clAlc f'cs G C% (TZ t IV) f) eje z yv3! Z C: 2 eAe