Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 1997/02/24• Page 1 February 24, 1997 .Mounds View City Council APPROVE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting February 24,1997 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ********************************************************************************** The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:00 p.m. on February 24, 1997. • PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor McCarty, Council members Trude, Quick, Koopmeiners and Stigney ALSO PRESENT: Bruce Kesel, Finance Director/Acting Clerk Administrator Pam Sheldon, Community Development Director Jim Ericson, Planning Associate Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works Bob Long, City Attorney ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA: Mr. Kesel noted that a revised Agenda had been distributed to the Council members. One item had been added to the Consent Agenda. APPROVAL OF NIINUTES• February 10,1997 -City Council Meeting: MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Trude to approve the Minutes of the City Council Meeting on February 10, 1997, as presented. • VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to accept the Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of November 7, 1996 and the Cable TV Committee Meeting Minutes of January 8, 1997. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: There was no Special Order of Business. CONSENT AGENDA• Mr. Kessel read the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Adopt Resolution No. 5089, Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds. B. Adopt Resolution No. 65092, Amending Resolution No. 5065, Re-scheduling City Council Meetings • Falling on Legal Holidays. C. LICENSES FOR APPROVAL: Roofin¢.: Expires June 30.1997: Berwaid Roofing Co. -New MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Quick to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried RESIDENTS REOUEST5 AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: Ms. Barbara Haake, 3024 County Road I, who is also on the Rice Creek Watershed Board of Directors was present to provide information about a clean up project and dam construction project at Locke Lake in Fridley. The project was finally completed on Friday, February 21st. All of the taxpayers in the 30 cities around will now be responsible to maintain the sediment basin for Fridley which will be a considerable cost. The project came in lower than anticipated and to date $129,000 remains in project funds. At this time, the Rice Creek Board is determining what can or will be done with the remaining funds. She provided several options which she feels should be considered, including 1) returning the funds to the taxpayers; 2) reducing next years tax levy, 3) leaving the money in a special fund to be used to maintain the sediment basin, or 4) to debate with the other cities as to what they would like to do -including the possibility of dividing the funds to be used for their own Water Management Plan. She asked that the Council consider this and make a recommendation to Ramsey County and the Rice Creek Watershed Board. She would also recommend that all cities agree to pay only for the maintenance of the sediment basin as originally agreed upon. . Mayor McCarty thanked Ms. Haake for bringing this matter to the Council's attention. He further stated he would suggest that Mounds View notify Ramsey County and the Rice Creek Watershed Board . Page 3 February 24, 1997 Mounds View City Council of the City Council's displeasure with the overage of the project and ask that next year's levy be reduced by the $129,000 which he feels would be the most direct way of handling it. MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Trude to direct staff to prepare appropriate correspondence for forwarding to the Rice Creek Watershed District and the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Don Heresu, 2260 Buckingham Lane, asked that the Council consider providing a sound barrier between the trucking company and the south edge of Townsedge Terrace to help with noise in their park from the trucks. He would also ask the City Council to work with Ramsey County and the City of New Brighton for a fence on the West end of Townsedge Terrace. He also wished to commend the Mounds View Police Department for their response to a recent problem at their park. Mayor McCarty stated he would look at Mr. Heresu's requests along with city staff and will respond as soon as possible. Cameron Obert, 8315 Greenwood Drive, asked for a brief update on the Anoka County Airport and MAC's response to the city's correspondence. • Bob Long, City Attorney, provided an update, stating that the City Council drafted and sent a letter to MAC, objecting to their updated Comprehensive Plan. To date, they have not responded to the letter and he would suggest that the City Council request that MAC be present at one of the next City Council meetings and provide a response to the Council's concerns. Mayor McCarty asked that the Clerk Administrator send a letter to MAC requesting their presence at an upcoming City Council meeting. Ed LeTendre, 2088 Rustad Lane, introduced the Council to some young residents who were in attendance and wished to address the Council about a Community Center. Mikandra Ristow, 2103 Cornell Drive, stated a group of youth have accumulated over fourteen pages of community service hours that they have put in at the Bel Rae. She provided a petition containing approximately 60 signatures of people who would like to see the Bel Rae used as a Community Center. She stated they would all appreciate the Council's consideration in this matter. Megan Ristow, 2103 Cornell Drive, stated the Community Center provides youth with an alternative to being out on the streets and she would like to see the Bel Rae used as a community center. Mike Ristow, on behalf of many other residents, thanked Ed LeTendre for all that he has done for Mounds View. Public Hearing and )<ntroduction for brat reading of Ordinance No. 596, Amending Section 1106.02, Subd 2 and 3 of the Mounda View ZoninE Code to Allow Eight Children in Family Foater Homea: Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:36 p.m. • Page 4 February 24, 1997 Mounds View City Council APf°'~~fl~;`rD Ms. Pam Sheldon explained that this amendment would allow homes that are governed under the Department of Human Services and under the Department of Corrections could have up to eight children. A second reading and action on this Ordinance amendment would be scheduled for March 10, ] 997. Don Heresu, 2260 Buckingham Lane, wondered if this ordinance would affect the number of children allowed at the Homer House property. Mayor McCarty explained that this would not apply to professionally staffed facilities, but rather to foster homes where parents reside in a home atmosphere. Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 7:44 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Approve the Introduction of Ordinance No. 596, Amending Section 1106.02, Subd. 2 and 3 of the Mounds View Zoning code to Allow Eight Children in Family Foster Homes, and to waive the reading thereof. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Public Hearing and Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for Cinder's Greenhouse at Mounds View Shopping Center, 2535-2585 Highway 10. Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7.45 p.m. Jim Ericson, Planning Associate, explained that this would allow for the operation of an outdoor flower martin the parking lot of Mounds View Square. Cinder's was issued CUPS for the 1995 and 1996 growing season and no changes are pr1oposed to the location, layout and operation from previous years. Mr. Ericson explained the agreed upon deposits and charges for water service. He noted that the following conditions would be a part of the Conditional Use Permit: 1) the facility shall be allowed to operate from March 15,1997 to July 15, 1997; 2) the hours of operation shall not exceed 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.; 3) only the sigrage shown on the Greenhouse Design Plan shall be allowed; and 4) all lighting for the use shall be supplied by existing parking lot lighting and supplemental interior lighting, if needed. David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, asked how the $1.00 per day water charge was derived. Mr. Ericson explained that this figure was established by the Public Works Department, based upon the amount used in past years. Lynn Gustafson, (no address given), asked if Cinder's would be doing any fertilization in the greenhouse. She noted that the State Agricultural Department requires back flow prevention devices so that the fertilizer doesn't go back into the water system. Jim Ericson agreed to check on this matter. Bob Long, City Attorney, suggested that a "hold harmless agreement" be entered into as well with Cinder's for the use of the city's water system. Ma or McC closed the Public Hearin at 7:50 .m. Y ~3' 8 P c,u • Februge 5 24, 1997 ' m3' Mounds View City Council MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Koopmeiners to Approve Resolution No. 5090, Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Cinder's Greenhouse to Operate an Outdoor Flower Mart at Mounds View Square Shopping Center, 2535-2585 Highway 10, AS AMENDED TO INCLUDE CONDITIONS REQUIItING A BACK FLOW CHECK VALVE AND A HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Public Hearing of Old Highway 8 Reconstruction Project Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:51 p.m. Mike Ulrich, Director of Public Works, provided the Council and public with a brief background of the Old Highway 8 project. He noted that the total project cost is approximately $1.4 million, with Mounds View's contribution being proposed at approximately $330,000. He provided a diagram showing the new alignment of Old Highway 8. Pam Darsie, 2268 Buckingham Lane, asked how close the new roadway will be to the park office. She stated her concern about traffic and their children's safety when the office is being used as a recreational center for them. Mr. Ulrich indicated on the diagram the location of the new roadway. It was estimated that it will be . moved 35 feet to the west, but will be within the curb right-of--way. Mr. Larry (inaudible) of the Ramsey County Public Works Department was present and noted that stakes could be erected or the area painted to indicate the new alignment for residents to assess the impact it could have. He stated he would see that this is completed within the next week. John Holmes, 5012 Londonary Avenue, stated his home will runs adjacent to the property where the roadway will be and wondered if any type of sound barrier will be constructed. Mr. Ulrich stated that no sound barrier has been proposed for this project at this time. Mayor McCarty asked that Mr. Uhrch schedule a time when he could get together with some of the residents of Townedge Terrace to answer in more detail questions that they may have in regard to the proposed project. ff anything is left unresolved, time will be set aside at the next Council work session to discuss this matter. Henry Ruggles, 2629 Lake Court Drive, stated he feels it is very difficult for cars and trucks to navigate onto Highway 10. He wondered how and what traffic controls will be used at the new intersection to help improve the problem. Mr. Ulrich noted that the county will be putting aright-hand turn lane in on Old Highway 8 to access Highway 10. Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 8:05 p.m. Mayor McCarty asked if adoption of Resolution No. 5091 will in any way change or hinder resident's opportunity for input and impact on this project. Mr. Ulrich noted that it would not, and that residents would still have an opportunity, per the charter, to petition the improvements. The bid award is expected to come before the City Council for approval at the Apri128th meeting. Ma or McC noted a minor char a to Resolution No. 5091. The tenth ara h should be chars ed to y ~3' 8 P Brae g read, " ...specifications HAS BEEN advertised for the project. Page 6 February 24, 1997 Mounds View City Council APPP~'!!ED MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Koopmeiners to Approve Resolution No. 5091, Considering Old Highway 8 Reconstruction, AS AMENDED. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Public Hearing and Introduction for Fiat Reading of Ordinance No. 594, An Ordinance Amending Chapter 606, 607 and 1005 of the Mounds View Municipal Code related to the requirement to mow tall greases and creating an exemption for wetland and native vegetatbn. Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 8:07 p.m. Mr. Jim Ericson noted that approval of Ordinance No. 594 would allow for exemptions to the Mounds View Code. Presently, the City Code specifies that tall grass (over 8" in height) must be cut, without exemptions. This ordinance would allow for certain areas to be exempted from this provision. Mr. Ericson proceeded to go through these exemptions. Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 8:13 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Koopmeiners to Approve the Introduction of Ordinance No. 594, An Ordinance amending Chapter 606, 607 and 1005 of the Mounds View Municipal Code related to the requirement to mow tall grasses and creating an exemption for wetland and native vegetation, and to waive the reading thereof. Mayor McCarty noted that he cannot support this Ordinance. He feels this could cause problems in neighborhoods where one homeowner chooses to have natural plantings and windblown seeds from their yards invade other carefully manicured properties. He feels this "broad brush approach" will only create problems. Ms. Trude noted that a landscape plan such as this would require the approval of the Community Development Director. Mayor McCarty stated he thinks the ordinance allows for the development and cultivation of natural areas and that the approval of the Director is only to assure that it is done properly. Jerry Linke noted that this situation is only new to Mounds View. In New Brighton experienced a situation very similar several years ago and when the city required the homeowner to mow the grasses, the homeowner fought and won the case. Council member Stigney felt perhaps the staff could make some modification to the Ordinance requiring approval fi-om adjacent property owners. Mayor McCarty noted that when a property is sold, the new homeowner may not be in agreement. Council member Trude asked staff to check with the City of New Brighton and have the Planning Commission revisit the issue to see if a proposed change should be made. She felt perhaps the Introduction of Ordinance No. 594 should be tabled until the next council meeting. MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Koopmeiners to table the Introduction of Ordinance No. 594. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Mohan Camed Page 7 February 24, 1997 Mounds View City Council AP~i~~'~CD Public Hearing and Introduction for First Readin= of Ordinance No. 595, An Ordinance adding day care centers and group nurseries as a Conditbnal Use in the B-1, B-2, B~, B-4 and I-1 zoning districts. Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 8:20 p.m. Ms. Sheldon explained that Ordinance was prompted in part by a request by the Children's Home Society to go into the Bel Rae if it is converted to a Community Center. The property where the Bel Rae is located is currently zoned B-3, which does not allow Day Care Centers as a permitted use. Additionally, it was felt that this change would also allow for the possibility of on-site daycare for some of the employers in the community. Julie Olson, 2663 Lake Court Circle, felt this may allow for a Kinder Care to locate in an industrial park. She feels perhaps the Ordinance may be too broad. Ms. Sheldon noted a that conditional uses would require special review by the Planning Commission and the City Council therefore the suitability of the site could be addressed in that process. A discussion followed in regard to concerns about the possibility of a child care facility locating within a close proximity of adult establishments or liquor stores. Ms. Trude stated she would like to see some distance requirements established to prevent potential problems such as this. There was also discussion as to the • possibility of re-zoning the Bel Rae property, however Ms. Sheldon noted that this could place other restrictions on the property. Council member Stigney noted that he would like to obtain information in regard to the safety level for a child's exposure to exhaust fumes. Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 8:33 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Trude to Table the Introduction of Ordinance No. 595, to allow stafftime to obtain additional information. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried COUNCIL BUSIlVESS• A. Statue Report on Pedestrian Bridge over Highway 10. Ms. Sheldon provided a summary as to the status of the proposed pedestrian bridge project. She noted that at the last City Council meeting, several issues were raised and the council wished to continue the discussion at the February 24th meeting. Ms. Sheldon proceeded to address each of the issues -the extent of public notice and participation, the projected costs and sources of firnding for the bridge, and the impact or usefiilness of the bridge. She also went through the estimated budget for the project, detailing three different financing scenarios for the local costs. She noted that there is sufficient funds available in Tax Increment Financing funds to pay part or all of the local costs. Additionally, MSA funds could be used, however timing for future road projects would need to be adjusted. Mayor McCarty thanked Ms. Sheldon for all the work she has done on this project and the long hours she has worked. However, he still has concerns that he feels need to be addressed. If the city intends to keep faith with . the spirit and intent of Chapter 8 of the City Charter, it would not go forth with projects which get out of hand in cost ovemms. In regard to his concerns about the sources of funding, in particular the street lighting funds, he stated he feels taxpayers expected the funds to be used for streetlights in their own neighborhoods, not for Page 8 February 24, 1997 Mounds View City Council the bridge project. He stated there has been no evidence by expert testimony or scientific study and demographics, traffic analysis or a needs asses~nent to support any claim that a pedestrian bridge on Long Lake Road will offer a broad benefit to the majority of Mounds View citizens. Furthermore he sees a safety issue with regard to the design of the ramp and where the spiral ramp empties, the compatibility of skateboards/bicycles/rollerblading and foot traffic on the bridge deck. Longterm maintenance estimates are limited to best guesses, and no provisions have been made for future replacement costs. The cost of the project has escalated from the original $120,000 estimate to approximately $246,500, representing a 105% cost ovemin. He feels all of this makes this project unfeasible for the city at this time. MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Koopmeiners that the City Council stop all fimrther action on the pedestrian bridge over Highway 10, settle aU accounts owed to date, abandon the bridge project and notify appropriate government agencies of this action. Jerry Linke, 2319 Knoll Drive, stated as Mayor he found the financing options while working with the city auditors and temporary finance department head. At that time, he had been informed that tax increment financing was not a financing option, as would have been his first choice. He noted that the city does have letters of support from both the Police Chief and the Minnesota State Patrol. Without doubt, and in his opinion, the $200,000 is worth saving a life and he still feels he made the right choice in voting approval of the pedestrian bridge. Jill (last name inaudible), a resident of Mounds View and a employee at Pinewood Elementary School, stated on a daily basis she witnesses cars that blatantly disregard children on the streets and walkways. She feels it is unsafe to cross Highway 10. Furthermore, she feels it is very disrespectfui to citizens who served on the Task Force to now vote down the project. She, as a taxpayer, is willing to pay for the bridge to allow citizens access to the other side. Russ Nordstrom, 2536 W. County Road H2, stated he is opposed to the project and feels kids need to use common sense. There are plenty of opportunities to cross the highway with the stoplight walk signs. He feels kids are not going to take the time to walk the extra distance just to use the bridge, and he feels this would just be a waste of taxpayer funds. Karen Arciero, 7501 Spring Lake Road, stated she feels the bridge is needed. She stated as an adult she is often scared to cross Highway 10. She feels the city needs to provide a safe opportunity for kids to cross the highway. Henry Ruggles, 2629 Lake Court Drive, stated he has been opposed to the bridge since the beginning. He too feels that skateboarders will be using the bridge and cause seniors to be afraid to do so. Additionally, he is concerned about how the costs have increased. He does not feel that the cost will justify the amount it will be used. David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, stated he agrees it would be nice to have a safe option for kids to cross the highway, but the city needs to consider what it can really afford. Sherry Gunn, 8120 Red Oak Court, stated Mounds View represents pride, partnership and progress. She feels the bridge is a sign of progress for the city, and the community residents working with the council and stag' represents parnership. The bridge was a topic of the Focus 2000 group as a means of connecting the community and she asked that the council let the work continue. Page 9 February 24, 1997 Mounds View City Council APP~~~JED Joanne (inaudible), 8493 Spring Lake Road, stated she is against the bridge because she does not feel the location is appropriate. She feels it would be better to build it on County Road I. She also feels right now the money would be better spent on making improvements to the roads in Mounds View. Bruce Brasaemle, 5127 Long Lake Road, stated he is in support of the bridge. He feels the council needs to respect the citizen input of Focus 2000 and move forward. With the projected increase in traffic volume on Highway 10, he feels there will be more potential for mishaps at the intersection. He has seen many cars go through red lights there. He would like to see the bridge as an opportunity for the future residents. Susan Do, 2274 Oakwood Drive, thinks kids would use the bridge to get the library, as well as many adults and families. The bridge would like many kids to the proposed community center. The city needs to move forward. The life of even one child is worth much more than the cost that the city will incur. Julie Olson, 2b63 Lake Court Circle, stated many of her neighbors are concerned about the effects of having a bridge ramp coming right out into their back yards. Marry residents of the townhome complex have experienced damage and vandalism of their properties by kids and there is concerns that potential hangouts could occur near the bridge and increase the occurrences. Bruce Howard, President of the Ramsey County Library Board, stated he is present, on behalf of the Library Board, to speak in favor of the bridge. They approved an easement with the city for the construction of the bridge and did so because they felt the bridge would provide greater access for residents to the library services. He urged the Council to consider this and move forward. Ernie Gustafson, 2525 County Road I, stated he is opposed to the bridge. He feels grants such as the one awarded to the city are the reason the federal government is in debt. He uses the Long Lake Road/Highway 10 intersection regularly and he never sees anyone using the crosswalk on the signals and he doesn't feel the bridge will be used. Ed Gerner, 2103 Pinewood Drive, stated he is in support of the bridge. He lives next to 35 W and he can easily access Shoreview's parks to walk in. He cannot do that in Mounds View, nor can he use the library as he does not feel safe crossing Highway 10 on foot. Bill Fritz, 8072 Long Lake Road, stated he is opposed to the bridge. He feels using the franchise fees to help fund the bridge is dishonest. He feels the city would be spending a lot of money without much benefit. He has rarely seen anyone use the pedestrian bridges in Columbia Heights and doesn't feel it would be used in Mounds View either. Cam Obert, 8315 Greenwood Drive, feels the proposed bridge and community center are merely a moral test for government to determine how they will take care of the residents. The government needs to move with the times, and progress. Tom Ernstor, 2504 County Road H2, stated he is a bicyclist and would likely use the bridge. However, he is not comfortable with the council making a decision on the bridge with the three different financing scenarios in front of them. He stated he feels a film financial statement needs to be developed to show exactly where the funds to construct the bridge will come from. Page 10 February 24, 1997 Mounds View City Council Af~F b`~';rED Mike Coon, 7851 Eastwood Road, stated he is opposed to the bridge because he feels the proposed location is not appropriate. He feels if the city were to build a bridge, it should be located at County Road UHighway 10/Silver Lake Road, where there would be access to restaurants, convenience store, ballfields, etc. Chuck Miller, Lake Court Dr., stated he also feels the location is wrong for the proposed bridge. The funds that are being proposed for the local costs are still taxpayer's money. He feels that money maybe able to be used for other projects. Furthermore, he feels providing the bridge will only be giving people a false sense of security. David Long, 7749 Knollwood Drive, stated he is in favor of the bridge. He wondered why people who were in favor of the bridge initially have not come to voice their objections. Bill Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, stated he thinks people have finally become aware of the costs and have decided to speak out against the bridge. He is opposed to the bridge. Council member Trade stated it saddens her that after a statement has been said enough time, people actually believe it to be true. She believes that is what has happened with the bridge project. The original budget was for $190,000. The ponding project was paired with tbe bridge project and funds were set aside in surface water management funds. The only cost that was not anticipated was $5,827.00 in legal fees and $5,000 for traffic signal modification neither of which are major or significant cost ovemms for the project. Ms. Sheldon explained that if the costs come in as estimated, there should be adequate funds to cover the anticipated costs. Mayor McCarty noted there are several references to the original $120,000 local share cost up to 1996. In the Fall of 1996 it escalated to $190,000 which represents a 30% increase. Ms. Trade stated that funds have been set aside for this project. If council members find it inappropriate to take moneys out of the various funds, the city could easily switch over to tax increment financing as a means of funding the project. These funds can only be used for limited things and this bridge would qualify as an approved project. Ms. Trade stated this project can be looked at from an environmental standpoint, it will be an investment in the future of the community and it will encourage kids to use amenities on the other side of the highway. She feels the bridge will be used and urged the Council to stop and think. She feels legally the city is bound to the contract that they entered. Mayor McCarty explained the tax increment financing process, and stated he feels it is more cost efficient to get rid of the tax increment financing bonds and districts and get those properly taxes back on the tax roles so that the city can help out with other things. He is more concerned about education than he is about any lack of concern for safety on the part of parents for their children. Council member Koopmeiners asked how unanticipated additional costs will be covered. Ms. Sheldon explained that the federal funding will not cover more than $480,000. Therefore, if the total project cost is $600,000 or less, there will be a 80/20 split between the federal government and the city. Mr. Koopmeiners stated he is opposed to the bridge project, noting that there is the possibility that the city will need to come up with even more funds if they run into unanticipated problems. Page 11 February 24, 1997 Mounds View City Council AFP~'fuVED Mr. Ayaz, Engineer with BRW, explained that he expects the bridge project to come in very close or lower than the 5600,000 estimate. Ms. Trade asked Bob Long, City Attonley to address the issue of the city's contractual obligations. Mr. Long stated, as he understands it, the city only has a contract with the Engineering/Design firn and that the city pays them for the work. He could not comment on the nature of the federal grant. He noted, however that there are two pieces of legislation now that are pending, which would dramatically affect the use of excess tax increment therefore, if the city is considering the use of tax increment financing on this project, they should do so as it may possibly not be available within the next several months. VOTE on Motion to stop all fittther action on the Pedestrian Bridge over Highway 10, settle all accounts owed to date and abandon the bridge project and notify the appropriate government agencies. Mayor McCarty: aye Council member Stigney aye Council member Koopmeiners aye Council member Trade nay Council member Quick nay • Motion Carried (3-2) B. Statua of TIT Plan for Bel Rae. Mr. Kesel explained that the city proposed having its public hearing on the proposed tax increment financing plan for the Bel Rae project on March 24,1997. However, final TIF plans could not be prepared due to lack of information, and therefore, they were not presented to the County and School District 30 days in advance of the proposed Public Hearing. Therefore, he recommended that the Public Hearing be changed to Apri114, 1997. REPORTS• Report of Council members: Trade: Ms. Trade stated she really lost faith in the community process and feels that very little consideration was given to the public comments by the council. ~pmeiners: No report. Stimev: No report. Quick: No report. Report of Mavor McCarty: No report. Report of Clerk Administrator: No report. Report of Staflz No report. Report of Attoraev: No report. Mayor McCarty noted that the next Council Work Session will beheld on March 3,1997 at 6:00 p.m. The next Council Meeting is on March 10, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Stigney to adjourn the meeting at 10:55 p.m. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Respectfully submitted, f Tamara D. Saefke Recording Secretary • •