Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000006_pg132000132 Sept. 6, 1961 Special Meeting (con't) A resident asked the reason f;or the $106.50 hook -up and it was again explained that the total number of hookups or services were divided into the total cost and this amount then became the service connection- charge. The Mayor then called on Mr Z i Mann to explain the financing of this project. Mr. Mann stated that on the following Monday at the regular Council neeting the Council would consider the objections rendered at this hearing and then act to either adopt the assessment role as presented or corrected. He further stated that those assessed would have thirty (30) days from that time to pay their assessment with out interest. After thirty(30) days this role would go to the County and be spread on the taxes. Following this thirty(30) day period interest would be added at the rate of 6% per year over a fifteen (15) year period on a decl ir&ng _ba1a,nce. He then cited examples of how an assessment could be paid off. The Clerk stated that there would be no individual notice of assessment amounts sent out, but that this information could be readily obtained at the Village office. The acting Mayor then called for objections to the assessment. #1. Mr. Jesse Varnes of 7350 Fairchild Ave. objected to the amount of the assessment as a large portion of one of his lots was not usable because of a swampy area in back of one of his lots. He feels that this assessment will cause a hardship on him and that he will not benefit in proportion to his assessment. The Attorney stated that the Council would make a determination of benefits and then decide whether of ..n•ot ...a _ :correc.tion should .be made, and on that basis either adopt or correct the assessment role. #2. Mr. Gerald Blanski, 1881 Woodale Drive, objected to the assessment because his lot has a 256 ft. frontage while it is only 100ft. deep, therby making his frontage assessment $1 ,024. He stated that in his opinion the assessment is too high for the amount of benefits received. #3. Mr. Alvin Hillsdale, 7850 Spring Lake Park Rd., objected to the assessment on the grounds that he does not have the front footage stated in the assessment book. Rather than the 563 ft. stated, he has approximately 265 ft. and therefore should have a lower front footage assessment. There being no further objections Mr. Hodges adjouned the meeting at 9:15 P.M. After the meeting, an open question and answer period was held. Questions regarding the cost of previous projects, other Villages procedures, hookup fees, future projects, Council policy regarding installation cf water, etc. These were discussed at some length by those present. The question and answer period ended at 9:45 P.M. Respectfully submitted by Lloyd J. Blanchard Village Clerk