HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000008_pg118-2-
010118
The Engineer again took the floor and explained who the
contractors were and gave the full costs of the projects as
follows:
1961 -e1 Total Cost
Front Footage
Service Connection
1962•"1 Total Cost
Front Footage
Service Connection
$49,441.48
3.11
91.18
2,538.49
2.66
58,80
Mr. Knutson then explained the reasons for the difference
in the costs per home,
1. Lower bid per foot of pipe.
2. Lessappurtenances to the line.
3. Amount of front footage to be assessed.
Several questions from citizens were answered and the hearing
was then recessed to give those pre sent an opportunity to check their
personal assessment,
The hearing on the matter of rezoning of Lot #58, Auditor's
Sub - Division #89 was opened by the Mayor.
There were no obj ectore present, and the Council agreed .
that the actual rezoning of the property would take place after
a building permit was issued.
The Mayor then closed this hearing.
Motion by Hodges to accept minutes of August 13, 1962
as presented, Seconded by Malvin, 3 Ayes,
Blanchald abstained because of absence from said meeting,
A Memo from the Attorney was read and placed on file,
Memo is in regards to possible assessment of corner -lot after lot
is split.
The Police Commission report was read and placed on file.
The matter of extermination of squirrels by shooting was
brought up and discussed at some length.
Motion by Malvin to concur with the Police Commissions
recommendation and to immediately revoke all permits for
pest shooting in the Village The only shooting to be allowed
hereafter will be under the direct supervision of the Police Dept.
Seconded by Crane. 4Ayes.
The Police will notify the County game warden of this
action by letter& pure cr personal contact.
Mr. Joseph Jirovec, 7768 Groveland Road requested information
regarding possible rezoning of some of his property. He was
referred to the Planning Commission.
The Mayor reopened the Water Assessment Hearing and
asked for objections:
1. Mr. V. L. Grande, 5165 Long Lake Road,feels that the
assessment is unfair, and fears getting re- assessed for the same
property when land is fully developed.