HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000010_pg132-009things progressed. He stated their interest, of course, is in
keeping the county roads in proper shape for the people who use
them.
OBJECTIJNS were voiced by the following persons:
Don Voge
Hwy, 8, Co. Road J
Objected to paying for such a large undeveloped area
---120 acres.
George Jackson
8300 Hwy. 8
Same objection as Mr. Voge. Cost too large for
80 acres.
John Echo
5420 Jackson St.
He felt prices out of proportion to value of house.
"Exactly what troubles are you having with sewage?"
"Do we need both sewer and water?"
Wm. Frits
8072 Long Lake Road
Questioned boundary limits as shown by notice.
Felt Village should have approached Dept. of Agriculture
and State of Minnesota Farm School for plans. Felt we
are commited to a tremendous expenditure without authority
of the people of the community. Felt people commited
to take the system whether they wanted it or not Cost
too high.
F. J. Nahurski in behalf of Mrs. Stella Skiba
5205 Hwy. 8
Questioned the necessity for sewer at this time.
When water was put in, it was done as a necessity
for health conditions. Fears over-extension beyond
potential of the Village to catch up with this improve-
ment so as to reduce cost within reasonable range of all.
Suggested posting referendum so people can voice opinion.
Mr. D. D. Wendt
7474 Spring Lake Rd.
Those who need improvements the least are going to pay
the most. In his area most lots are one acre, which
makes cost about $1,800 per lot---too high. Object to
taking service when not needed. Thinks debt too large
for assessed valuation.
--6--