HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000011_pg06-011and the cost figures are good through the year 1966.
Mr. Meyers made several more comments on questions which
came up at previous hearings such as, "Why is this matter
(sewer proposal) not put to election ?" He explained, as in
previous hearings, that State law now placed the responsibility
with the Village Council for making the decision whether or not
to go ahead with this project. The law requires certain hearings
be held. The hearings are for explanation and airing objections.
Written objections are also acceptable and will be recorded.
He explained that verbal statements would be taken later in
the meeting and those not wishing to express themselves orally
would have the opportunity of signing their names to sheets
designated "For" or "Against" the proposal.
He explained the matter of easement requirements--approxi-
mately 100 are needed to complete the system. Appointments were
scheduled at previously appointed times for those wishing to
confer with the Village Attorney on the matter. Some persons
have donated them, which is very helpful since the Village does
not have a budget for the acquisition of easements at this time.
They have tried to conform easements with future road plans and
future needs of the Village.
In reply to the questions asking how this improvement
will be paid for and when will assessments begin, he stated
if the Council approves the project, the assessment hearings
-10-