Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000027_pg622 MSP (Hodges /Blanchard) To approve the following checks Check #5429 consecutive through 5478, Payroll check #'s 2262 consecutive through 2282, bond check #599. Total disbursements $197,504.20. In addition, to approve general check #5477 for $165,859.00 transferring money from the water utility, sewer utility and project account to the bond redemption account to reimburse the bond account for the levy reduction per Resolution #504 dated October 12th, 1970. Also to approve check #600 totalling $925.00 transferring money from the 68 -3 bond fund to the general account project fund to pay a portion of check number #5475. Acting Mayor Blanchard called the assessment hearing for Sanitary Sewer, Water and Drainage Project 1971 -1 and 1971 -la to order at 8:33 P.M. Clerk - Administrator Zylla read the legal notice and attested to its publication in the New Brighton Bulletin on August 26th and September 2nd, 1971. An error was noted in the legal notice in the statement "every lot, piece and parcel abutting on Spring View Lane ". It is noted in the minutes that the following persons received legal notice in which the estimated costs per foot were included: Random, Inc., White Oak Builders, Keith Harstad, Anthony Holschuh, Spring Lake Park Lutheran Church, Vern Sinierson, Gordon Aspenson, David Mueller, Charles Charrier and Howard Thorson. Engineer Boehm made the presentation on behalf of the Village. He stated that the rate per front foot on sanitary sewer lateral was $7.75, water main lateral $4.65, drainage lateral $6.95. He also stated that sanitary sewer services were $157.50 each and water services were $145.50 each. He said that this compared with an estimated cost at the improvement hearing of $9.00 per front foot for sanitary sewer, $6.10 per front foot for water lateral, $230.00 each for sanitary sewer and $210.00 each for water services. He stated that the drainage installation was originally planned to be put in with the street project but that since so much excavating had to be done it was decided to include it with the sewer and water project. He did feel, however, that the $12.40 estimate for street surfacing would be reduced by an aiaount as yet undetermined because of a fact that the drainage was constructed in this project. Ed Dropps of White Oak Builders questioned whether credit was given for the previous sanitary sewer and water street assessment on Woodcrest Drive and on Woodale Drive. Engineer Boehm explained that yes, they we and in addition, abatements were granted because of the creation of the north -south streets. Mr. Dropps inquired as to whether only the north side of Woodcrest and Woodale was assessed for drainage? Mr. Boehm explained that yes under this assessment only the north side is. He stated that this assessment is not a storm sewer, it is only a drainage assessment which is necessary because of the construction of blacktop streets in the area. He felt that the people on the south side in effect had paid this assessment when they were assessed for sanitary sewer when their street was constructed. Acting Mayor Blanchard asked if the drainage would have been built if the project had not been started. Engineer Boehm stated that in his opinion no it would not have been.