Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000032_pg100PROCEEDINGS OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA November 26, 1973 A Regular Meeting of the Mounds View Village Council was called to order by Mayor Neisen at 8:00 P.M. on November 26, 1973 at the Mounds View Village Hall, 2401 Highway #10, St. Paul, Minnesota 55112. Present: Mayor Neisen Councilman Hodges Councilman Baumgartner Councilman Johnson Councilman Pickar Also Present: Clerk - Administrator Zylla Attorney Meyers MSP (Hodges - Pickar) To approve the minutes of November 12, 1973. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor Robert Waste, owner of the B & R Liquor Store and Grocery Store appeared before the Council to request permission to enlarge his liquor store into the area presently used as his grocery store. He stated he was going out of the grocery store business. 5 Ayes Attorney Meyers stated that according to Mounds View Code 100.08, (5) "no license shall be effective beyond the compact and contiguous space named in the license for which it is granted ". The Council suggested that Mr. Waste be referred to the Planning Commission. Mr. Waste saw no need to go to the Planning Commission because his proposed use of the building would generate less traffic, would be 23 less hours of operation, and have no Sunday traffic or no additional lighting. MSP (Baumgartner - Pickar) To refer Robert Waste to the November 28th Planning Commission meeting for their review and comment of his proposed remodeling and expansion of his liquor store. MSP (Neisen- Baumgartner) To call a special meeting of the Council for December 3, 1973 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the Planning Commission recommendation relative to Mr. Waste's proposal. 5 Ayes 5 Ayes Since several persons were in the audience relative to a contraversy about proposed street lights on Ridge Lane between Long Lake Road and Rainbow Lane, the Mayor turned the meeting over to Clerk- Administrator Zylla for an explanation. Clerk- Administrator Zylla stated that in October of 1972 the Council ordered two mid - block lights on Ridge Lane. NSP inadvertently omitted installing the lights. After a new request was initiated and the light stakes were stationed, a property owner in the area named Peter Hanslip objected to the lights because they would devalue his property and the light would shine into his bedroom. Based on his objection, a survey was made of the residents on Ridge Lane and it was found that 11 favored the lights as proposed, 2 were opposed, and 1 had no response. Shortly after a petition was received requesting that only one light be installed. Yet, another petition was circulated requesting that some lighting be installed.