Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000037_pg143-2- July 28, 1975 Mr. Glazer said that because of the minimal set back at the Shopping Center without a buffering the R -1 property to the north would be subject to rezoning. Councilman Shelquist said this situation required a variance if not corrected. He asked Administrator Achen to contact Mr. Paster about the buffering. Mr. Ole Bacon, 2625 Highway 10, asked if the City would give permission for a produce truck to park on his property for the purpose of selling corn and potatoes. He stated that in the past the truck parked on the shopping center property and he has no objection to the truck parking on his land which is located on the corner of Eastwood and Highway 10. Administrator Achen reported that he has received calls from businessmen in the area that were quite displeased with these produce trucks competing with their business. Mayor Johnson said he received a call from a person objecting to the environment created around the truck. Namely the unsightly appearance of the truck and congregation of children by the truck. Councilman Baumgartner said the vendor should come to the city for a permit and discuss the situation at that time. He is not in favor of the unsightly vehicle such as the one parked on the shopping center property last year. Councilman Shelquist is opposed to the truck. He said last year it was like a mini -flea market with people selling oriental rugs and statues. If it is allowed to park and sell produce it should be allowed to park only for the day and be taken away at night. Mr. McCarthy, 7760 Long Lake Road, explained a problem he and two of his neighbors have with surface water ponding in their backyards. He said he has discussed this situation with the city administrator and has decided that the most expedient way to correct the situation was for them to dig a drainage ditch system to carry water to the storm sewer easement on his property and wants to dictate how and when it will be constructed. If he can't he said he will fill the ditch in. Mr. McCarthy wanted to know the correct procedure to follow for a situation such as this. Attorney Meyers said that a petition could be presented to the city with signatures of surrounding property owners asking for the improve- ment. This would allow the city to assess the cost of the improvement back to the property owners. Mr. McCarthy said he has a letter from the contractor stating this would be taken care of by May 1971. For this reason he would rather do the work himself and charge the contractor for it. He said he felt the city, particularly the building inspection department, should see to it that contractors provide adequate drainage to homes they construct.