Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000039_pg043-2- There is no question that the liquor establishments are such as to require regulation and certainly a reasonable license fee is justified, and my clients certainly do not object to paying a license fee, or for that matter, doing whatever else is necessary as responsible business establishments within the City, and to that end, engage in self regulating at their own expense. Considering the population of the City of Mounds View, that is approximately 16,000 people, and a police department having 11 men including the chief, it would certainly appear that no extra policemen are on the police department because of the presence of a hospitals ty industry in the City, thus the police department is probably at a minimum man power level to, provide adaquate services to the people of Mounds View, even if there were no liquor or caberet establishments at all. In sum and substance, there has been no showing that regulating the liquor and caberet business in Mounds View, justifies an increase in cost in license fees as proposed. It is obvious that there is a need of the City for raising revenues, that can't be obtained by property taxation. It would thus appear that the substantial increase in the license fees is due to the financial pinch of the City looking for additional revenue from a source where existing license fees are adaquate to cover the cost of regulation. Increased police salaries in and of itself does not justify raising present liquor and caberet licensing fees. The answer probably lies in new licenses where there are needs for regulation greater than homes or other general businesses. An example of such businesses that could very well need additional regulation or call upon the City for additional services over and above the norm, is such businesses as shopping centers or apartments. If there are some areas where the fees under consideration are low, commensurate with the cost of regulating, this would probably be on restaura.rts and possibley on the caberet fees, but then, if there is to be an increase fee on restaurants or caberets then this should not be a duplicated license fee, in other words, such as an on sale liquor establishment and restaurant together, or a liquor establishment and a caberet, or an establishment having all three. If restaurant and caberet fees are found to be low, then some means of ir apportionment should be used such as size or seating capacity or hours of operation. It should also be pointed out that the on sale liquor establishments pay substantial real estate taxes, and contribute a substantial payroll within the City of Mounds View for some 240 employees. The council should also bear in mind that the on sale liquor establishments do have com- petitors in neighboring cities, so that a licensing fee should not be such as to put Mounds View Business establishments in an unfavorable competitive position as to its competitors in neighboring cities. The purposed increase would have the liquor and caberet license fees for Mounds View the highest per capitoeicense fees in this area. On sale liquor establish- ments are entitled as tax paying citizens within the City to have the council consider the economic effect of the licensing fee on its business citizens while the City also considers a means for acquiring the necessary increase in revenues to provide the services which the citizens expect the City to provide. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, JGB :mmp