HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000039_pg051Councilman Pickar: I can see no big reasons why not. Probably
would have preferred a consensus of the neighborhood but I realize
you are pressed for time and recall from before there was no
objection. I am for the plan and this would have delayed it so I am
in favor of the mobile home.
Councilman Shelquist: We are in essence telling the Planning
Commission what to do. I would rather have their input since they
will be granting the variance. The Planning Commission normally
recommends to us. Once someone else sees this they may want the
same thing.
Mr. Richardson stated that the placement of a mobile home on school
grounds is approved according to the State Bldg. Code Department.
Attorney Meyers stated that in Chp. 43 it states temporary special
permits may be issued by the Council when said home is outside of
the mobile home park. However, it can be issued for only 90 days
and must be renewed each time.
Councilman Hodges: I dread seeing a mobile home on it. But as it is
temporary and if the Planning Commission goes along with it I will
go along with it.
Mayor Johnson asked how many schools in our district have temporary
facilities like this? Mr. Richardson replied that no other has a
mobile home, but Edgewood Jr. High School has a temporary structure.
Mayor Johnson: Regardless of what the Planning Commission would say,
my feeling would be against it. I think the Council has to be
consistent. I understand your position, and it is unfortunate, but
I don't want to have Mounds View used as a test spot for a mobile home.
He further suggested to Mr. Richardson that he consider using the
facilities here at the city hall in Mounds View.
ENGINEER BEARDEN'S REPORT: On November 8, 1975, regarding Improvement
Project 1973 -75, you approved the amendment to #4 for an extension
of time and I need your signatures now. That is all I have at th e
present. Mr. Bearden then left., after obtaining the necessary signa-
tures.
Ad. Achen discussed the proposed Community Development Block Grant
application, explaining that the handout is the substance of the narra-
tive for the City's Community Development Block Grant application.
It would be appropriate for the Council, if they so desire, to
formally accept this narrative. Under II, #2, there is a typographical
error, the number "11,000" should read "$41,000 ".
MSP (Johnson- Hodges) to accept the program narrative for the
Community Development Block Grant application. 5 ayes
MSP (Johnson - Hodges) to approve the transfer of $9022 from water
fund and $9021 from sewer fund to 1969 water revenue bond redemption
fund. 5 ayes
MSP (Pickar - Hodges) to approve the applications for licenses
as presented. 5 ayes
They are: Builders & Remodeler's Inc.
2630 Hennepin Ave. So.
Minneapolis, MN. 55408
D.W. Construction, Inc.
8804 Lexington Ave.
New Brighton, MN. 55112