HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr000990_000040_pg120-3-
Mayor Johnson recessed the regular meeting and called to order
the public hearing on Roger Baumgartner's (7585 Knollwood)
request for trained dog permit. Adm. Achen stated the four -year
old Labrador for which the permit is requested had been examined
by Doris Dechene, training instructor, who had found the dog
overall acceptably trained. Mayor Johnson asked if anyone wished
to speak for or against the permit.
Robert Waste, 2345 County Rd. H -2, asked what exactly the permit
is for. Is it a kennel? Is it to train dogs?
Mayor Johnson explained the dog leash law -- dog cannot be
off leash unless trained and you have a special permit. To
receive special permit, dog has to be examined by person schooled
in dog obedience. Councilman Shelquist added that off leash
is only when it is exercised, not running loose. Mayor Johnson
also added that the dog cannot be loose on public propery,
such as parks.
MSP (Pickar- Hodges) to approve the trained dog permit request
of Roger Baumgartner, 7585 Knollwood. 4 ayes
Baumgartner - 1 abstain
Mayor Johnson adjourned the public hearing and called
the regular Council meeting back to order.
WHITE OAK ESTATES THIRD ADDITION. Adm. Achen stated that prior
to approval of the resolution approving the final plat of
White Oak Estates Third Addition, Council should take action
on the development contract, copy of which the developer has
received.
Attorney Meyers stated that one of the developers had questioned
him about paragraph 3 of the development contract which states
that all improvements required shall be constructed and paid for
by the subdivider, and the Attorney explained that all public
utilities have been installed. The developer had also questioned
him about paragraph 15 of the contract regarding the necessity
of a $5,500 cash bond. The Attorney explained that there is
some drainage work that has to be done with the installation of
culvert and swale and cost of this is covered by the bond. If
the developer, for some reason, doesn't complete the project,
the City can use the monies for finishing the project. The developer
had indicated to Atty. Meyers that he would use a letter of credit,
which the Atty. said was satisfactory.
Atty. Meyers also stated the developer's objection to paragraph
16 of the contract, the terms "in the City Council's opinion ".
Atty. explained the purpose of the contract is to have a control
over the development, to be sure it is carried out in conformance
with Council's approval.
Atty. Meyers also stated the developer's question of whether or
not the costs (engineering, legal, etc.) in paragraph 20 of
the contract had not been included when he was assessed for
the cul -de -sac. Administrator Achen stated he had examined