HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr000990_000040_pg121-4-
the bills and administrative costs for Project 1975 -4 were not
included. We have reapportionment of assessments cost of $675
plus other administrative costs not included in the Project
assessment; and that is why we would like to consider increasing
the fee schedule.
Bob Carlson, Brentwood Development Co., stated that he and
Ed Dropps, the other developer, were satisfied with the conditions
and prepared to go along with the wording. But he stated the
bank doesn't want to issue an open ended letter of credit. He
asked regarding putting up a cashier's check in lieu of the bond
in order that they might apply for a building permit this week.
They would want to trade the cashier's check for a bond next week.
Atty. Meyers indicated bond suits are hard to deal with, would
rather see something more negotiable; however, he gave his approval.
Mayor Johnson indicated he would be available to sign the agreement
when the cashier's check is delivered.
MSP (Shelquist- Hodges) to adopt Resolution No. 728 authorizing mayor
and administrator to enter into contract putting into force
the Mounds View Development Agreement No. 76 -2 with White Oak
Estates subject to receipt of a negotiable bond or similar posting
and after the Attorney's review and approval of the bond. 5 ayes
MSP (Hodges - Pickar) to adopt Resolution No. 729 approving the
final plat of White Oak Estates Third Addition. 5 ayes
Administrator Achen inquired as to the dates for commencement
and completion of the improvements per paragraph 12 of the
contract. Bob Carlson agreed to commencing work no later than
May 20, 1976, and completion of construction no later than
June 15, 1976. Mayor Johnson pointed out that this is a tight
schedule, and Carlson indicated that is what he wanted.
Mayor Johnson indicated to John Bearden that Comstock & Davis
would have to inspect this project.
MAJOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST OF SELMER SAKARIASON FOR CHAPMAN 2nd
SECOND ADDITION. Adm. Achen summarzied what had taken place
on this request since the last Council meeting. Council had,
in essence, approved the preliminary plat as designed; the problem
was that two structures were existing on land astride property
lines which would be in violation of City zoning code. The
structureshave to be removed before the final plat is approved.
The property owner has arranged sale and construction of new
home on northernmost lot. Staff recommends the owner present
to the City a recordable deed for Lot 1 (the northernmost lot)
so that if for some reason the final plat is not approved and
recorded, the City may record the deed for Lot 1. The developer