HomeMy WebLinkAboutgr00090_000041_pg200July 12, 1976. Page 2
MSP (Hodges - Pickar) to approve the licenses as presented excluding
the B. Glommen Sno-Kones and to waive the fee for Mrs. Marilyn
Gum, 7805 Greenwood Drive. 4 ayes
REPLACEMENT OF MAYOR JOHNSON
The administrator stated that they are asking for people to submit
by noon July 26, 1976, names of those interested in the Mayor's job
or the Council job. Interviews will be conducted July 29, 1976,
at 7:00 pm.
MSP (Hodges - Baumgartner) that John Pickar's name be added to the list
to sign the checks for the City. 4 ayes
PUBLIC HEARING ON ROSENQUIST ADDITION
The regular Council meeting was recessed and the Public Hearing
called to order at 8:10 pm. The administrator stated that the
Rosenquist Addition extends from Spring Lake Rd to the West City
boundary. They have asked for a subdivision into 3 lots; 2 on the
East side of Pleasant View Drive and one on the West side of Pleasant
View Drive, and to create two outlots. The Planning Commission has
recommended approval and the staff recommends that the outlots not
be allowed to be created because they are substandard.
Mrs. Bonin, 8360 Pleasant View Drive, stated that it would not be an
outlot;it would be transferred onto her property.
Ad. Achen stated that once that is created it is still a separate
piece of parcel and would have to be taken off the county records as a
separate parcel.
Atty Meyers stated that they could add it on to the lot instead of
calling it an outlot. The plat would include Mrs. Bonin's lot also
but it would be expanded to include the outlot.
Ad. Achen stated that the staff recommended that Outlot B be made
a part of Block 1. The problem is they would pick up 80 feet more of
assessments. It would be an economic advantage to having it go to back
taxes.
Ken Sjodin said that he had talked to the man who owns the land directly
to the East and there is no chance of buying it. From the citizen's
point of view this is obviously the only way of platting it.
Ad. Achen said that there is no simple solution. We either protect
the City or reduce the cost to the property owner. Is there any way
that that assessment could be deferred?
Atty Meyers replied that that is legal in certain circumstances
Mr. Sjodin stated that if the outlot is left on you still have the
assessments that have to be paid some time. If you do it that way they
have lost the potential of buying that 80 feet from the other owner
where they could have realized a sale. From the City's point of view
he did not feel it would go back to back taxes.